Committee Assignments: Senate Rules Committee • Senate Appropriations Committee • Senate Health Committee • Senate Public Safety Committee • Assembly Appropriations Committee • Assembly Health Committee
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill expands eligibility for post-arrest or post-conviction vacatur and record sealing for human-trafficking, intimate-partner-violence, and sexual-violence victims by allowing vacatur of any offense except murder.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • Massachusetts • Bill
Committee Assignments: Joint Committee on Health Care Financing • House Committee on Ways and Means • Joint Committee on Financial Services
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires PBM contracts with Massachusetts pharmacies to set ingredient cost criteria and dispensing fees at least equal to State Medicaid payments and prohibits retroactive rate reductions, pharmacy steering, and brand incentives when generics are available.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • Massachusetts • Bill
Committee Assignments: House Committee on Ways and Means • Joint Committee on Health Care Financing
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires the Massachusetts Health Policy Commission’s Office of Health Resource Planning to assess statewide pharmacy supply and “pharmacy deserts” and report findings by September 1, 2026.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • New Hampshire • Bill
Committee Assignments: Senate Committee on Education • House Committee on Education Policy and Administration
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill makes home education a natural right for parents, allowing an optional declaration only to access public school programs under RSA 193:1-c or upon withdrawal from public school.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • Massachusetts • Bill
Committee Assignments: Joint Committee on Health Care Financing
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires the Health Policy Commission to hold annual public hearings by October 1 comparing actual aggregate primary care expenditures to the aggregate primary care expenditure target and examining related drivers.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • New Hampshire • Bill
Committee Assignments: Senate Committee on Health and Human Services • House Committee on Commerce and Consumer Affairs
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires New Hampshire health plans to give covered persons written, 14-point formulary-deletion notice at least 60 days before removing drugs and to maintain specified prescription-drug records for commissioner review.
This bill prohibits health plan issuers, including pharmacy benefit managers and third-party administrators, from restricting pharmacies, pharmacists, or personally furnishing prescribers from offering prescription transparency and access services.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • California • Bill
Committee Assignments: Senate Health Committee • Senate Rules Committee • Assembly Health Committee • Assembly Appropriations Committee
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires the Department of Managed Health Care to maintain a public website listing each licensed PBM’s key license details, but makes the website requirement operative only after additional appropriations.
Committee Assignments: Senate Financial Institutions Insurance and Technology Committee • House General Government Committee
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires any person soliciting pharmacy benefit plans in Ohio or providing PBM services under covered agreements to hold a PBM license by July 1, 2027.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • West Virginia • Bill
Committee Assignments: Senate Committee on Health and Human Resources • House Committee on Health and Human Resources
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires PEIA to issue a competitive pharmacy cost containment vendor solicitation by July 1, 2026, including separate contracting and itemized monthly savings reporting, while engaging prescribing providers without mandating clinical changes.
Committee Assignments: House Committee on Economic Development/Banking/Insurance and Commerce
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill limits pharmacy audits to no more than once every 12 months and requires 14-day advance notice and pharmacist-conducted judgment-based audits before on-site review of contracted pharmacies.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • Rhode Island • Bill
An Act Relating To Insurance -- Pharmacy Benefit Managers Act (Requires Pharmacy Benefit Managers To... (View full title on source site)
label_outlineRegistration/Licensure
label_outlinePBM enforcement
1st Chamber
2nd Chamber
Executive
check_circle_outline
check_circle_outline
check_circle_outline
check_circle_outline
Introduced
May 22, 2026
Passed (House)
June 10, 2026
Passed (Senate)
June 11, 2026
Signed
June 22, 2026
Last Action: June 22, 2026 - Signed by Governor
Enacted • 2026-2026 Regular Session • Introduced: May 22, 2026
Committee Assignments: House Committee on Health and Human Services
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires pharmacy benefit managers to obtain a certificate of authority from the Rhode Island health insurance commissioner to operate or hold themselves out as PBMs.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • Rhode Island • Bill
An Act Relating To Insurance -- Pharmacy Freedom Of Choice--Fair Competition And Practices (Imposes ... (View full title on source site)
label_outlineTransparency and Disclosure
label_outlineAppeal procedure
label_outlineGag clause
1st Chamber
2nd Chamber
Executive
check_circle_outline
check_circle_outline
check_circle_outline
check_circle_outline
Introduced
March 12, 2026
Passed (Senate)
May 26, 2026
Passed (House)
June 10, 2026
Signed
June 22, 2026
Last Action: June 22, 2026 - Signed by Governor
Enacted • 2026-2026 Regular Session • Introduced: March 12, 2026
Committee Assignments: Senate Committee on Health and Human Services • House Committee on Health and Human Services
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires pharmacy benefit managers to maintain and follow a reasonable appeals process for multi-source generic pricing disputes, including submitting determinations within 15 days.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • Rhode Island • Bill
An Act Relating To Insurance -- Pharmacy Benefit Managers Act (Requires Pharmacy Benefit Managers To... (View full title on source site)
label_outlineRegistration/Licensure
label_outlineTransparency and Disclosure
1st Chamber
2nd Chamber
Executive
check_circle_outline
check_circle_outline
check_circle_outline
check_circle_outline
Introduced
March 12, 2026
Passed (Senate)
May 26, 2026
Passed (House)
June 10, 2026
Signed
June 22, 2026
Last Action: June 22, 2026 - Signed by Governor
Enacted • 2026-2026 Regular Session • Introduced: March 12, 2026
Committee Assignments: Senate Committee on Health and Human Services • House Committee on Health and Human Services
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires pharmacy benefit managers to obtain a certificate of authority from Rhode Island’s Health Insurance Commissioner before acting, offering services, or holding themselves out as PBMs.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • Rhode Island • Bill
An Act Relating To Insurance -- Pharmacy Freedom Of Choice--Fair Competition And Practices (Imposes ... (View full title on source site)
label_outlineAppeal procedure
label_outlineGag clause
label_outlinePBM enforcement
1st Chamber
2nd Chamber
Executive
check_circle_outline
check_circle_outline
check_circle_outline
check_circle_outline
Introduced
May 26, 2026
Passed (House)
June 10, 2026
Passed (Senate)
June 11, 2026
Signed
June 22, 2026
Last Action: June 22, 2026 - Signed by Governor
Enacted • 2026-2026 Regular Session • Introduced: May 26, 2026
Committee Assignments: House Committee on Health and Human Services
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires insurers to demonstrate to the director their willingness and potential ability to ensure pharmacy services meet availability, accessibility, adequate personnel and facilities, and continuity requirements.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • Massachusetts • Bill
Committee Assignments: Senate Committee on Ways and Means • Joint Committee on Health Care Financing
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires the Health Policy Commission to establish and publish statewide aggregate primary care expenditure targets for 2027, 2028, and 2029, and to not reduce later targets below 12%.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • Massachusetts • Bill
Committee Assignments: Joint Committee on Health Care Financing • Joint Committee on Public Health
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires the Health Policy Commission to enforce performance improvement plans and civil penalties against health care entities that CHIA identifies as failing primary care expenditure targets.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • Massachusetts • Bill
Committee Assignments: Joint Committee on Financial Services • Joint Committee on Health Care Financing
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires pharmacy benefits managers operating in Massachusetts to obtain a license from the Commissioner of Insurance before providing pharmacy benefits management services.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • Massachusetts • Bill
Committee Assignments: Joint Committee on Financial Services • Joint Committee on Health Care Financing
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill establishes a pharmacy benefit manager duty of care to enrollees, health benefit plans, and providers, and requires the Commissioner of Insurance to regulate, enforce violations, and impose penalties.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • Massachusetts • Bill
Committee Assignments: Joint Committee on Financial Services • Joint Committee on Health Care Financing
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill establishes pharmacy benefit manager duties to perform pharmacy benefit management services in the best interests of enrollees, health benefit plans, and providers, under specified transparency and conflict-disclosure standards.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • Massachusetts • Bill
Committee Assignments: Joint Committee on Health Care Financing • Joint Committee on Financial Services
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires a pharmacy benefits manager to update its maximum allowable cost list within seven calendar days after specified cost changes and provide affected pharmacies access to the list.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • Massachusetts • Bill
Committee Assignments: Joint Committee on Health Care Financing • Joint Committee on Financial Services
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires pharmacy benefits managers and covered entities to update each maximum allowable cost list at least every three business days and use the updated MACs to calculate payments within two business days.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • Massachusetts • Bill
Committee Assignments: Joint Committee on Financial Services • Joint Committee on Health Care Financing
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill prohibits pharmacy benefit managers in Massachusetts from earning income from pharmacy benefit management services except through a stated, contract-listed pharmacy benefit management fee not tied to drug prices or savings.
This bill prohibits pharmacy benefit managers from transferring or receiving patient or prescriber-identifiable prescription records with an affiliated provider for a commercial purpose, with specified exceptions.
This bill prohibits a pharmacy benefit manager from acquiring or holding any retail pharmacy permit interest in Arizona and requires the State Board of Pharmacy to revoke or not renew violating permits.
Committee Assignments: House Committee on Insurance • Senate Committee on Finance • Senate Committee on Insurance • ods::id::14c72962-6002-5939-adb5-d2c0b4434361
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires pharmacy benefit managers to reimburse local pharmacies using a NADAC-based reimbursement formula with specified adjustment and dispensing-fee limits starting January 1, 2026.
Committee Assignments: ods::id::14c72962-6002-5939-adb5-d2c0b4434361 • Senate Committee on Insurance • House Committee on Insurance • House Committee on House and Governmental Affairs
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires pharmacy benefit managers to act solely for the benefit of health plans and enrollees and bars conduct that increases drug costs or interferes with access except as plan design requires.
Committee Assignments: House Ways and Means Committee • House Rules Committee • House Health Committee • Senate Health Committee • Senate Rules Committee • House Insurance Committee
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires PBMs to pay participating pharmacies at least the NADAC rate or, if unavailable, the pharmacy acquisition cost rate, plus minimum dispensing fees, and bars payment below acquisition cost.
Committee Assignments: House Insurance Committee • House Health Committee • House Ways and Means Committee • House Rules Committee
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires PBMs to pay participating pharmacies at least the NADAC rate or, if unavailable, the pharmacy acquisition cost rate plus a professional dispensing fee, and it applies to contracts beginning January 1, 2027.
Committee Assignments: House Finance, Ways and Means Subcommittee • House Committee on Insurance • House Committee on Finance, Ways and Means • House Health Subcommittee • House Committee on Government Operations • House Committee on Calendar and Rules • House Insurance Subcommittee
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill bars pharmacy benefit managers from acquiring, holding, or controlling any ownership or beneficial interest in a pharmacy license or holder starting January 1, 2027.
Committee Assignments: Senate Committee on Health and Welfare • Senate Committee on Finance, Ways and Means
Summary
AI Overview
This legislation introduces comprehensive regulations affecting pharmacies and pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) within Tennessee. It restricts PBMs from acquiring, holding, or exercising control over pharmacy licenses or entities through ownership, contractual, or operational arrangements starting January 1, 2027. These measures aim to reduce conflicts of interest, enhance transparency, and ensure patient access, particularly in rural and underserved areas. Pharmacies are required to disclose ownership and control information annually, and the law emphasizes maintaining independent pharmacy operations free from PBM influence.
The legislation also provides exemptions for hospital or health-system pharmacies that serve only their own patients or employees. Additionally, it establishes protections for independently owned or unaffiliated pharmacies offering mail-order, specialty, or delivery services. Impacted pharmacies affiliated with PBMs may continue operations until the end of 2026 if they demonstrate active efforts to sell to unaffiliated entities, with potential extensions upon proof of progress.
Enforcement provisions include oversight mechanisms, with the Tennessee Board of Pharmacy tasked with assessing potential violations and notifying licensees. Affected pharmacies must inform patients and healthcare providers of any changes by November 1, 2026, indicating that they may no longer dispense medications after that date. The law also introduces a limited-use pharmacy license for rare or FDA-designated drugs, which is subject to annual review and cannot be transferred to PBMs or their affiliates.
Overall, the legislation seeks to strengthen the integrity of Tennessee’s healthcare delivery system by separating financial interests from clinical decision-making, potentially reducing drug costs and improving access. It aims to promote fair competition among pharmacies and PBMs, ultimately benefiting consumers through increased transparency and reduced conflicts of interest.
Committee Assignments: Senate Committee on Commerce and Consumer Protection • House Committee on Health • House Committee on Consumer Protection and Commerce
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires written audit requests for registered pharmacists and pharmacies to include a signed receipt acknowledgment before any prescription record audit includes identifying prescription information in notices.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • Rhode Island • Bill
An Act Relating To Businesses And Professions -- Pharmacies (Strengthens Enforcement Of The State'S ... (View full title on source site)
label_outlineFair Pharmacy Audits
1st Chamber
2nd Chamber
Executive
check_circle_outline
stop_circle
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
Introduced
May 05, 2026
Failed (Senate)
May 21, 2026
Last Action: May 21, 2026 - Committee recommended measure be held for further study
Failed Sine Die • 2026-2026 Regular Session • Introduced: May 05, 2026
Committee Assignments: Senate Committee on Health and Human Services
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires audit entities to give pharmacies 14 days’ advance written notice of on-site pharmacy audits, including the prescription-number range, before starting audits under Rhode Island law.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • Rhode Island • Bill
An Act Relating To Commercial Law -- General Regulatory Provisions -- Deceptive Trade Practices (Pro... (View full title on source site)
label_outlinePBM enforcement
label_outlinePatient steering
label_outlineSpread pricing
1st Chamber
2nd Chamber
Executive
check_circle_outline
stop_circle
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
Introduced
May 05, 2026
Failed (Senate)
May 21, 2026
Last Action: May 21, 2026 - Committee recommended measure be held for further study
Failed Sine Die • 2026-2026 Regular Session • Introduced: May 05, 2026
Committee Assignments: Senate Committee on Health and Human Services
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill makes specified pharmacy benefits manager conduct unfair and deceptive and a method of unfair competition under Rhode Island law when the conduct involves spread or effective rate pricing, patient steering, or other prohibited acts.
This bill prohibits persons from simultaneously owning specified health care entity combinations in Ohio, requiring divestment within one year or cessation of Ohio services within two years for existing violators.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • New Jersey • Bill
This bill requires pharmacy benefits managers to certify annual compliance with the Commissioner by an executive officer, signed each year, and makes PBM fees administrative costs in carrier rate filings.
Committee Assignments: House Committee on Emerging Issues
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill bars pharmacy benefits managers, in contracts entered into or modified on or after August 28, 2018, from requiring a covered person at point of sale to pay more than the lesser of the copay or the cash price.
Committee Assignments: Senate Committee on Families, Seniors and Health
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires pharmacy record audits to include at least 14 days’ written notice and limits initial on-site audit cycles to two times per calendar year unless probable fraud is suspected.
Committee Assignments: Senate Committee on Finance • House Committee on Insurance • Senate Committee on Insurance
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires PBMs to use NADAC-based pharmacy reimbursement by January 1, 2026, and to provide pharmacists an appeal process with corrective payments when claims fall below acquisition cost.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • New Hampshire • Bill
Committee Assignments: House Committee on Commerce and Consumer Affairs • Senate Committee on Health and Human Services
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires a health carrier and any pharmacy benefits manager to enter and retain a written agreement, with semiannual audits, for PBMs administering New Hampshire benefits to more than 100 covered lives.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • New Jersey • Bill
Committee Assignments: Assembly Financial Institutions and Insurance Committee • Assembly State and Local Government Committee
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires pharmacy benefits managers to submit plain-language, machine-readable reports every six months to New Jersey plan sponsors and the Department for specified drug claims and related compensation.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • New Jersey • Bill
This bill prohibits pharmacy benefits managers from receiving commission-based or non–bona fide service-fee compensation for administering or managing prescription drug benefits for a carrier, requiring flat, fair-market-value itemized services.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • New Jersey • Bill
This bill requires pharmacy benefits managers to include required compliance and information-obligation clauses in PBM–plan sponsor contracts and to submit plain-language, machine-readable claims and spending reports at least every six months.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • New Jersey • Bill
The bill establishes minimum participation and contract-standard requirements for pharmacy networks under New Jersey health benefits plans administered or managed by pharmacy benefits managers (PBMs). It requires a covered health benefits plan to allow any pharmacy that meets the plan’s “standard contract terms and conditions” to participate as a network pharmacy.
It also requires that PBM plan contract terms and conditions be “reasonable and relevant,” as determined by the Commissioner of Banking and Insurance. In making that determination, the commissioner must review (among other items) the current terms and conditions in network pharmacy contracts and whether the reimbursement and dispensing fees paid by the health benefits plans are sufficient to cover ingredient and operational costs.
The Commissioner of Banking and Insurance is authorized to adopt rules and regulations under the Administrative Procedure Act as necessary to implement the bill.
The bill takes effect on the first day of the 13th month after enactment and applies to contracts between a health benefits plan and a PBM that are initiated or renewed on or after the enactment date.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • New Jersey • Bill
This bill prohibits pharmacy benefit managers from using spread pricing and bars them from entering, extending, or renewing pharmacy benefits management contracts unless they remit 100% of related remuneration to carriers or purchasers.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • New Jersey • Bill
Committee Assignments: Assembly Financial Institutions and Insurance Committee
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill prohibits PBMs from using spread pricing or entering or renewing covered PBM contracts unless the contracts require 100% remittance of related remuneration to carriers or purchasers.
Committee Assignments: House Committee on Rules - Administrative • House Committee on Health and Mental Health
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill limits pharmacy benefits managers to recoupment only from corrected, adjudicated amounts in narrowly scoped audits, and bars recoupment based on extrapolation while requiring at least 14 days’ written notice.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • New Jersey • Bill
Committee Assignments: Assembly Financial Institutions and Insurance Committee
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill bars pharmacy benefits managers from acquiring any direct or indirect interest in, or holding any direct or indirect permit to operate, a pharmacy practice site under the New Jersey Pharmacy Practice Act.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • New Jersey • Bill
Committee Assignments: Assembly Financial Institutions and Insurance Committee
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill prohibits pharmacy benefits managers and pharmacy services administrative organizations from structuring compensation as a commission or as any fee other than a bona fide service fee when administering pharmacy benefits.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • New Jersey • Bill
Committee Assignments: Assembly Financial Institutions and Insurance Committee
Summary
AI Overview
The bill establishes standards governing contracts between pharmacy benefits managers (PBMs) and health benefits plans that administer or manage prescription drug or pharmacy services.
A health benefits plan with PBM administration or management must allow any pharmacy that meets the plan’s “standard contract terms and conditions” to participate as a network pharmacy. Contract terms and conditions must be “reasonable and relevant,” as determined by the Commissioner of Banking and Insurance, with the commissioner required to review (among other items) (1) current terms and conditions in network pharmacy contracts and (2) the reimbursement and dispensing fees paid by the health benefits plan, including whether those payments are sufficient to cover ingredient and operational costs.
The Commissioner of Banking and Insurance is authorized to adopt rules and regulations under the Administrative Procedure Act as necessary to implement the bill.
The bill takes effect on the first day of the thirteenth month following enactment and applies to PBM-related contracts between a health benefits plan and a PBM that are initiated or renewed on or after the enactment date.
This bill requires each chain or community pharmacy to apply to New York’s Department for designation as either a chain or community pharmacy, renewing every three years with a $500 fee.
Committee Assignments: Senate Committee on Business and Insurance • House Committee on Public Health • House Committee on Health and Human Services Oversight
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires payors to pay providers full amounts for clean claims within 30 calendar days after receipt and mandates itemized claim-level accounting for each remittance.
Committee Assignments: Senate Committee on Business and Insurance • House Committee on Insurance • House Committee on Commerce and Economic Development Oversight
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires pharmacy benefits manager contracts with the Oklahoma Employees Insurance Plan to pass all rebates through to the Plan and make them fully audit-accessible.
Committee Assignments: Senate Committee on Business and Insurance • House Committee on Public Health • House Committee on Health and Human Services Oversight
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires pharmacy benefit managers to update MAC pricing at least every seven calendar days using specified sources and to exclude dispensing fees from MAC reimbursement calculations for contracted pharmacies.
Committee Assignments: House Committee on Health and Welfare • Senate Committee on Health and Welfare
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires PBMs and insurers to disclose pharmacy-related affiliated-entity structures and quarter-by-quarter claims data to the commissioner and attorney general.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • Massachusetts • Bill
Committee Assignments: Joint Committee on Financial Services • Joint Committee on Health Care Financing
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires pharmacy benefit managers to maintain a reasonably adequate, accessible in-state pharmacy network and bars steering by imposing a 10% surcharge on providers engaging in such conduct.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • Massachusetts • Bill
Committee Assignments: Joint Committee on Financial Services • Joint Committee on Health Care Financing
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill prohibits pharmacy benefit managers from using retroactive discount or “effective rate” methods that reduce ingredient payments and requires them to include ingredient costs and dispensing fees no less than Massachusetts Medicaid.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • South Carolina • Bill
Committee Assignments: House Committee on Labor, Commerce and Industry
Summary
AI Overview
The document outlines amendments to Section 38-71-2240 of the South Carolina Code of Laws, focusing on the pharmacy benefits management industry. The amendments mandate that pharmacy benefits managers provide unobstructed access to their Maximum Allowable Cost Lists for patients, consumers, and network pharmacy providers.
Key provisions include a requirement for pharmacy benefits managers to update their Maximum Allowable Cost Lists at least once every seven calendar days. Additionally, a process will be established for network pharmacy providers and pharmacies to access these updates.
The amendments also introduce a reasonable internal appeal procedure for pharmacies to contest reimbursement rates that fall below their acquisition costs for drugs. Furthermore, there will be an external review process for denied internal appeals conducted by an independent review organization.
These changes are expected to enhance transparency within the pharmacy benefits management system and may influence reimbursement rates for pharmacies. The act will take effect upon approval by the Governor.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • South Carolina • Bill
Committee Assignments: House Committee on Labor, Commerce and Industry
Summary
AI Overview
The document outlines amendments to the South Carolina Code of Laws that affect pharmacies and pharmacy benefits managers (PBMs). One significant change requires all pharmacies in South Carolina to cooperate with federal and state acquisition cost surveys, specifically the National Average Drug Acquisition Cost (NADAC) survey.
Additionally, the amendments establish new reimbursement guidelines for PBMs. They are required to reimburse pharmacies and pharmacists for prescription drugs and pharmacy services at or above the NADAC at the time of dispensing, along with a professional dispensing fee that must meet or exceed the current South Carolina Medicaid professional dispensing fee. In cases where NADAC is unavailable, the minimum reimbursement must be based on the Wholesale Acquisition Cost (WAC) plus the same professional dispensing fee.
Furthermore, a formal complaint process is introduced for pharmacies or pharmacists who believe they have been reimbursed below the mandated minimum. They can file a complaint with the Department of Insurance, which is obligated to review and make a determination within thirty days. If the complaint is upheld, the PBM must compensate the pharmacy or pharmacist for the underpayment and adjust reimbursements for similarly situated pharmacies.
Overall, this legislation aims to enhance financial accountability for PBMs and establish stricter reimbursement standards within the pharmacy industry.
Committee Assignments: Senate Committee on Business and Insurance • House Committee on Health and Human Services Oversight • House Committee on Public Health • Senate Committee on Health and Human Services
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill prohibits pharmacy benefit managers from steering covered persons away from qualified medically integrated pharmacies affiliated with their treating specialty providers, including by denying network participation or imposing retaliatory policies.
Committee Assignments: Senate Committee on Business and Insurance • House Committee on Public Health • House Committee on Health and Human Services Oversight
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires pharmacy benefits managers to update MAC pricing at least every seven days, provide provider-specific MAC lists, and honor reimbursement appeals within 10 days.
Committee Assignments: Senate Committee on Finance, Ways and Means
Summary
AI Overview
The bill makes changes to Tennessee’s sales tax exemption rules for certain prescription drugs and related services. It requires that (i) the existing exclusion of prescription drugs and patent medicines not otherwise exempt under Tennessee Code Annotated (TCA) § 67-4-712(g)(1) be narrowed/updated by changing the cross-reference text in TCA § 67-4-708(2)(D), and (ii) a new exemption be added to TCA § 67-4-712 for specified prescription drug receipts.
Specifically, receipts from the sale of prescription drugs or medicines are exempt from the tax imposed under TCA Title 67, Chapter 4, Part 7 when the drug’s cost for a 30-day equivalent supply exceeds the Medicare Part D specialty tier cost threshold for 2025 plan years. The threshold is determined by the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) pursuant to 42 CFR § 423.104(d)(2)(iv)(A). The exemption also covers services necessary for proper preparation, storage, handling, administration, patient education, or post-sale monitoring of drugs or medicines that qualify for the exemption under the new subsection.
Committee Assignments: Committee on Banking, Commerce and Insurance
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires pharmacy benefit managers to immediately notify the Director of material ownership or control changes and imposes $100-per-day penalties for late renewal submissions.
Department of Insurance; Pharmacy Benefits Manager Division; two exempt personnel positions authoriz... (View full title on source site)
label_outlinePBM enforcement
1st Chamber
2nd Chamber
Executive
check_circle_outline
check_circle_outline
check_circle_outline
check_circle_outline
Introduced
February 03, 2026
Passed (House)
February 26, 2026
Passed (Senate)
Enacted
April 16, 2026
Last Action: April 16, 2026 - Enacted
Enacted • 2026 Regular Session • Introduced: February 03, 2026
Committee Assignments: Senate Committee on Banking and Insurance • House Committee on Insurance
Summary
AI Overview
The bill authorizes the Alabama Commissioner of Insurance to staff the Department of Insurance’s Pharmacy Benefits Manager Division with up to two additional employees in the “exempt service,” meaning the employees are not subject to the state Merit System. It specifies that these two exempt personnel positions are in addition to any other exempt positions already authorized by law for the department, and directs that the compensation for these employees be set by the commissioner (Section 1).
It sets an effective date of June 1, 2026 (Section 2).
No other substantive provisions appear in the text provided beyond these employment-authorizing and effective-date requirements.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • Rhode Island • Bill
An Act Relating To Commercial Law -- General Regulatory Provisions -- Deceptive Trade Practices (Pro... (View full title on source site)
label_outlineSpread pricing
label_outlineEffective Rates
label_outlinePatient steering
1st Chamber
2nd Chamber
Executive
check_circle_outline
stop_circle
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
Introduced
March 27, 2026
Failed (House)
April 14, 2026
Last Action: April 14, 2026 - Committee recommended measure be held for further study
Failed Sine Die • 2026-2026 Regular Session • Introduced: March 27, 2026
Committee Assignments: House Committee on Corporations
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill makes pharmacy benefit managers’ specified conduct, including spread or effective rate pricing and patient steering tied to control or inducements, unlawful as unfair and deceptive trade practices in Rhode Island.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • Rhode Island • Bill
An Act Relating To Businesses And Professions -- Pharmacies (Strengthens Enforcement Of The State'S ... (View full title on source site)
label_outlineFair Pharmacy Audits
1st Chamber
2nd Chamber
Executive
check_circle_outline
stop_circle
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
Introduced
April 01, 2026
Failed (House)
April 14, 2026
Last Action: April 14, 2026 - Committee recommended measure be held for further study
Failed Sine Die • 2026-2026 Regular Session • Introduced: April 01, 2026
Committee Assignments: House Committee on Health and Human Services
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires auditing entities to provide pharmacies 14 days’ advance written notice before audits, including the prescription-range involved, and to establish a pharmacy appeal process for unfavorable preliminary reports.
Committee Assignments: House Labor and Commerce Committee • Senate Finance and Appropriations Committee • House Subcommittee #5 • House Compensation and Retirement Subcommittee • Senate Commerce and Labor Committee • House Appropriations Committee
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill prohibits pharmacy benefit managers and carriers from using misleading promotions, charging unreasonable claim-adjudication fees, or reimbursing pharmacies less than affiliates for the same services.
Committee Assignments: Joint Committee on Health Coverage, Insurance and Financial Services • House Engrossed Bills Committee
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires pharmacy benefit managers to allow covered persons who face mail-order delivery delays or unusable drug conditions to receive network-pharmacy dispensing capped at one copayment, coinsurance, or other out-of-pocket amount.
Committee Assignments: House Committee on Health Finance and Policy
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires pharmacy benefit managers and managed care organizations to reimburse community pharmacies at or above the new “fair pharmacy reimbursement” standard, and it prohibits fees or reductions that would cause below-standard net reimbursement.
Committee Assignments: House Committee on Health and Human Services • Senate Committee on Financial Institutions and Insurance • House Committee on Insurance
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires PBMs to file aggregated rebate and pricing reports with the Kansas Insurance Commissioner and limits their reimbursement practices to benchmarked amounts and capped patient cost shares.
Committee Assignments: Senate Health and Human Services Committee
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires PBMs and MCOs to reimburse community pharmacies at least NADAC (or WAC if NADAC is unavailable) plus a biennially adjusted professional dispensing fee.
Committee Assignments: House Committee on Insurance
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill prohibits PBMs and managed care plans from reimbursing Louisiana pharmacies below specified NADAC-based minimums and bars reimbursement calculations using spread pricing, steering, or effective rate pricing.
Committee Assignments: House Committee on Insurance • Senate Committee on Financial Institutions and Insurance
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires pharmacy benefit managers to register with the Kansas Insurance Commissioner before acting and prohibits them from collecting cost-sharing above submitted charges.
Committee Assignments: Senate Committee on Insurance
Summary
AI Overview
The bill establishes new state drug-pricing restrictions by creating R.S. 22:1867.1 (“Drug pricing”). It requires that a pharmaceutical manufacturer may not offer any drug for use in an Office of Group Benefits (OGB) insurance plan or any other state sponsored insurance plan at a price higher than the price Medicare pays for the same drug.
It also bars insurers, pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs), and any person acting on behalf of a PBM from providing reimbursement for any name brand drug, biosimilar, or generic drug for an OGB insurance plan or other state sponsored insurance plan if the reimbursement would be for an amount less than the price Medicare pays for the same drug.
The commissioner is directed to enforce the new restrictions and to promulgate any necessary rules and regulations to carry them out.
Committee Assignments: Senate Committee on Insurance
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires the commissioner to levy a $25,000 fine per pharmacy-benefits violation with no aggregate maximum, and to suspend or revoke the insurer’s certificate if the violation isn’t corrected within 30 days of notice.
Committee Assignments: Senate Committee on Commerce and Labor
Summary
AI Overview
The commissioner of commerce and insurance is required to publish, using existing resources, a report due on or before October 1, 2026 containing data on violations of Tennessee Code Annotated § 56-7-3124 reported to the commissioner as alleged to have occurred during the fiscal year ending June 30, 2026. The report must include (1) the total number of violations reported, (2) the commissioner’s findings from investigations into the alleged violations, and (3) the penalties imposed by the commissioner on pharmacy benefits managers found to have violated § 56-7-3124. A copy must be submitted to the chief clerk of the senate, the chief clerk of the house of representatives, and the legislative librarian, and the report may be published and delivered electronically.
The act takes effect upon becoming a law, with the public welfare requiring it.
Committee Assignments: House Committee on Health and Welfare • Senate Committee on Insurance
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires pharmacy benefit managers to reimburse under-reimbursed dispensing fees for Louisiana nonaffiliated pharmacies and pharmacists without charging any costs to plans, members, pharmacies, or pharmacists.
Committee Assignments: House Committee on Rules • House Committee on Health and Human Services Oversight • Senate Committee on Health and Human Services • House Committee on Public Health
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires pharmacy benefit managers to update Medicaid MAC pricing at least every seven calendar days and to allow providers to electronically appeal reimbursement within 14 days of final adjusted payment.
Last Action: March 30, 2026 - Report adopted; referred to the committee(s) on FIN as amended in HD 2 with none voting aye with reservations; none voting no (0) and Representative(s) Cochran, Lowen, Perruso, Quinlan excused (4).
Failed Sine Die • 2025-2026 Regular Session • Introduced: January 21, 2026
Committee Assignments: Senate Committee on Ways and Means • House Committee on Health • House Committee on Consumer Protection and Commerce • House Committee on Finance • Senate Committee on Commerce and Consumer Protection
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires pharmacy benefit managers to update maximum allowable cost pricing at least every seven days using specified sources and to provide updated MAC information to contracting pharmacies upon request.
This bill requires PBMs to reimburse pharmacies and pharmacists at least NADAC plus a $10.49 professional dispensing fee (or WAC plus $10.49 if NADAC is unavailable) and voids conflicting contract terms.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • Mississippi • Bill
An Act Relating To Insurance -- Pharmacy Freedom Of Choice -- Fair Competition And Practices (Provid... (View full title on source site)
label_outlineReimbursement to PBM-owned pharmacies
1st Chamber
2nd Chamber
Executive
check_circle_outline
stop_circle
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
Introduced
February 06, 2026
Failed (Senate)
March 26, 2026
Last Action: March 26, 2026 - Committee recommended measure be held for further study
Failed Sine Die • 2026-2026 Regular Session • Introduced: February 06, 2026
Committee Assignments: Senate Committee on Health and Human Services
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill prohibits pharmacy benefit managers from reimbursing non-affiliated pharmacies or pharmacists less than net effective reimbursement for the same drug or service, including all fees and incentives.
Committee Assignments: House Health Care Facilities & Systems Subcommittee • Senate Rules Committee • House Budget Committee • House Health & Human Services Committee
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires PBM-participating pharmacy contracts to include an administrative appeal procedure allowing pharmacies to file consolidated appeals within 30 business days and PBMs to respond within 30 business days.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • Rhode Island • Bill
An Act Relating To Insurance -- Pharmacy Freedom Of Choice -- Fair Competition And Practices (Provid... (View full title on source site)
label_outlineReimbursement to PBM-owned pharmacies
1st Chamber
2nd Chamber
Executive
check_circle_outline
stop_circle
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
Introduced
January 21, 2026
Failed (House)
March 24, 2026
Last Action: March 24, 2026 - Committee recommended measure be held for further study
Failed Sine Die • 2026-2026 Regular Session • Introduced: January 21, 2026
Committee Assignments: House Committee on Health and Human Services
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill prohibits pharmacy benefit managers from reimbursing non-affiliated pharmacies or pharmacists at lower net rates than affiliated providers for the same drug or service, and bars evasion of these requirements.
Committee Assignments: Senate Insurance Committee • House Insurance Committee
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill bars PSAOs, pharmacy switch companies, and rebate aggregators from operating in New York after specified deadlines unless each first registers and files required electronic disclosures with the Superintendent.
Committee Assignments: Assembly Health, Aging and Long-Term Care Committee
Summary
AI Overview
The recent legislative changes significantly impact the regulation of pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) in Wisconsin, focusing on enhancing transparency, fairness, and accessibility in pharmaceutical pricing and reimbursement practices. Key provisions require PBMs to pay pharmacies a professional dispensing fee that matches state medical assistance rates and prohibit them from imposing fees that would require remuneration from pharmacies. Additionally, PBMs must allow any licensed pharmacy to participate in their networks under the same terms and cannot charge different copayments based on network participation.
The legislation mandates that PBMs maintain and provide access to maximum allowable cost (MAC) lists, which must be updated promptly in response to price changes. Pharmacies are granted the right to appeal MAC determinations that fall below their acquisition costs, with PBMs required to resolve these appeals within a specified timeframe. Furthermore, PBMs are prohibited from discriminating against 340B covered entities and must ensure that all pharmacies in a preferred network are reimbursed at the same rates.
Auditing practices are also addressed, with requirements for uniformity in audits across similar pharmacies and restrictions on recouping reimbursements for errors that do not result in financial harm. PBMs must deliver final audit reports within a designated period and cannot retaliate against pharmacies for reporting violations or exercising their rights under the new regulations.
Health insurance policies are required to apply amounts paid for brand-name prescription drugs towards cost-sharing requirements, ensuring that patients' out-of-pocket expenses are minimized. Additionally, advanced written notice must be provided to enrollees regarding formulary changes, ensuring stability in medication options for those currently using affected drugs.
Overall, these changes aim to create a more equitable and transparent environment for pharmacies, pharmacists, and patients, significantly impacting the pharmacy and healthcare industries in Wisconsin.
Committee Assignments: Assembly Health, Aging and Long-Term Care Committee
Summary
AI Overview
The proposed legislation in Wisconsin aims to reform healthcare costs and prescription drug management, emphasizing affordability, transparency, and access to medications. Key provisions include eliminating cost-sharing for prescription drugs under the Medical Assistance program, capping insulin costs, and establishing a Prescription Drug Affordability Review Board to evaluate drug pricing and set upper payment limits for high-cost medications.
Pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) will be subject to increased transparency requirements, including the disclosure of profits and financial details related to health plan sponsors. Insulin manufacturers will be mandated to create safety net programs to provide insulin to uninsured or underinsured individuals, ensuring access to medications at reduced costs. Additionally, the legislation introduces a prescription drug importation program to allow the importation of non-brand-name drugs from Canada, aimed at generating savings for residents.
The bill also focuses on diabetes treatment by mandating that disability insurance policies cover expenses for insulin infusion pumps and related supplies, with a cap of $35 for a one-month supply of insulin. The Department of Health Services will explore the implementation of a centralized drug repository program, while the Commissioner of Insurance will report on the progress of the prescription drug importation program.
To enhance oversight of prescription drug affordability, an Office of Prescription Drug Affordability will be created within the Commissioner of Insurance, supported by increased funding. This initiative seeks to improve access to affordable medications for consumers and ensure fair compensation for covered entities in the pharmaceutical industry. Overall, the legislation aims to enhance the operational framework for pharmacies and improve access to affordable prescription drugs for Wisconsin residents.
The proposed legislation introduces comprehensive reforms to the regulation of pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) in Wisconsin, focusing on enhancing transparency, fairness, and accountability in the pharmaceutical supply chain. Key provisions require PBMs to pay pharmacies a professional dispensing fee that matches state rates and prohibit them from imposing various fees on pharmacies. Additionally, PBMs must allow any licensed pharmacy to participate in their networks under the same terms and conditions, ensuring equitable access for all pharmacies.
The legislation mandates that PBMs provide detailed maximum allowable cost lists to pharmacies, update these lists promptly, and establish an appeal process for pharmacies contesting low reimbursement rates. Furthermore, PBMs are required to notify enrollees of formulary changes well in advance and cannot remove drugs from formularies except at coverage renewal times. This aims to provide stability for patients regarding their medication options.
PBMs are also tasked with acting in the best interests of health benefit plan sponsors, including annual disclosures of profits and payments to consultants. They must remit payments for claims within 30 days and cannot discriminate against 340B covered entities in reimbursement practices. The legislation prohibits PBMs from retaliating against pharmacies for reporting violations or exercising their rights, fostering a more supportive environment for pharmacies.
Auditing practices are also addressed, requiring uniform standards for audits and prohibiting recoupments for errors that do not cause financial harm. The legislation aims to standardize reimbursement rates among pharmacies and protect pharmacies from unfair practices, ultimately benefiting consumers by improving access to pharmaceutical products.
Overall, these changes are designed to create a more transparent and equitable pharmaceutical landscape in Wisconsin, impacting the operations of PBMs, pharmacies, and health insurance providers significantly.
Committee Assignments: Senate Committee on Licensing, Regulatory Reform, State and Federal Affairs
Summary
AI Overview
The proposed legislation establishes new requirements for employee benefit plan administrators, insurers of large group health benefit plans, and pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) regarding the access and ownership of claims data by plan sponsors, such as employers. It mandates that contracts clearly state that plan sponsors own the claims data associated with their contracts, and such data cannot be sold without the consent of both the plan sponsor and the individual involved.
Plan sponsors or their designees are granted the right to request specific claims data and related information up to three times per plan year, covering periods of up to 24 months. Administrators and insurers are required to respond to these requests within seven business days. Additionally, detailed information about high-cost claims, defined as those exceeding $25,000 for non-pharmacy claims and $10,000 for pharmacy claims, must also be provided within the same timeframe.
PBMs are specifically required to furnish detailed data on prescription drug payments, rebate amounts, and claims within seven business days of a written request. They must also disclose any direct or indirect compensation paid to brokers or agents. The act prohibits PBMs from imposing excessive fees or conditions on information requests and ensures that claims data cannot be withheld if the plan sponsor attests to compliance with federal law regarding the use and disclosure of the information.
The legislation aims to enhance transparency in claims processing and costs, significantly impacting the health insurance and pharmacy benefit management industries. By improving access to critical claims data, the changes are expected to empower plan sponsors and potentially alter operational costs for PBMs and plan sponsors due to the new compliance requirements.
Committee Assignments: House Committee on Rules • House Committee on Health and Human Services • Senate Economic Development and Workforce Services Committee • Senate Rules Committee
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires pharmacy benefit managers in Utah to calculate maximum allowable cost using current comparable prices from multiple national sources and provide electronically searchable MAC lists to pharmacies.
Committee Assignments: House Committee on Health • Senate Committee on Health and Human Services
Summary
AI Overview
The bill creates a new statutory restriction on the Georgia Board of Community Health regarding pharmacy benefits manager (PBM) contracting under the state employees’ health insurance plan.
It adds a new Code section (45-18-6.2) establishing that, on or after July 1, 2026, the board may not enter into, execute, or renew any contract(s) to provide plan benefits with either: (1) any PBM that owns or has an ownership interest in any retail pharmacy; or (2) any legal entity that contracts with or uses a PBM that owns or has an ownership interest in any retail pharmacy.
The bill includes a transition/limitation provision stating that the new Code section cannot be construed to impair contracts that are in existence on June 30, 2026.
It also repeals all laws and parts of laws in conflict with the act.
Committee Assignments: Senate Rules Committee • Senate Appropriations Committee on Agriculture, Environment, and General Government • Senate Banking and Insurance Committee
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires the Office of Insurance Regulation to enforce uniform audit standards for Florida-licensed pharmacies by July 1, 2026, including cease-and-desist orders and category-based administrative fines.
Committee Assignments: Senate Rules Committee • Senate Health Policy Committee • Senate Appropriations Committee on Health and Human Services
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires the Agency for Health Care Administration to contract for an annual international reference pricing model and publish AHCA-set reference prices online within 10 days after receiving them.
Committee Assignments: House Health Care Budget Subcommittee • House Health & Human Services Committee • House Health Care Facilities & Systems Subcommittee
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires uniform pharmacy audit standards and restricts pharmacy benefit plan audits, including limits on notice, onsite timing, sampling, recoupment, and fraud-designation procedures, for licensed pharmacies.
Committee Assignments: House Health & Human Services Committee • House Health Care Facilities & Systems Subcommittee • Senate Rules Committee
Summary
AI Overview
The bill changes Florida’s consultant pharmacist statute by revising the statutory definition of “health care facility” used in the consultant pharmacist program. Specifically, it adds that a “health care clinic” qualifies as a health care facility when the clinic is owned by a hospital or by one or more physicians who are employed by or contracted with a hospital.
It also revises the scope of facilities already included in the definition by replacing the prior listing/cross-reference for clinics with the new ownership/employment/contract criteria for hospital-associated clinics. All other facility categories in the definition remain as listed (e.g., ambulatory surgical centers and hospitals under Chapter 395; certain addiction treatment facilities; hospices; nursing homes; ambulatory care centers; and nursing home components within continuing care facilities).
Committee Assignments: Senate Committee on Families, Seniors and Health
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill prohibits pharmacy benefit managers from restricting covered persons’ pharmacy choice, imposing inconsistent credentialing, or reimbursing for Missouri drug claims below the most recently published NADAC.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • South Carolina • Bill
Committee Assignments: Senate Committee on Banking and Insurance
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill generally prohibits pharmacy benefits managers from reimbursing pharmacies or pharmacists below 104% of NADAC or, if unavailable, WAC plus a floor dispensing fee, subject to its complaint process.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • New Hampshire • Bill
Committee Assignments: Senate Committee on Health and Human Services
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill delinks PBM compensation from drug prices and patient cost metrics by limiting PBM income from in-state pharmacy management services to amounts derived only from PB management fees set in PBM–insurer agreements.
Committee Assignments: House Committee on Health and Mental Health
Summary
AI Overview
The document outlines significant legislative changes regarding pharmacy benefits managers (PBMs) in Missouri, focusing on new regulations that affect the pharmacy industry and consumer rights. These changes aim to improve the relationship between PBMs, pharmacies, and patients, ensuring that individuals can choose their pharmacy without facing financial penalties or restrictions.
One of the key impacts of the legislation is the requirement for PBMs to reimburse pharmacies at rates no lower than the National Average Drug Acquisition Cost for prescription drugs. Additionally, pharmacies must receive a dispensing fee that is at least 90% of the MO HealthNet professional dispensing fee in effect on the date of service. To maintain fairness, PBMs are also mandated to update maximum allowable cost pricing at least every seven days.
Patients are granted enhanced rights under the new provisions, including the ability to receive written or electronic prescriptions that they can take to any facility of their choice. Furthermore, the legislation establishes an appeals process for pharmacies to contest reimbursement decisions related to maximum allowable cost pricing, ensuring a timely response from PBMs.
Overall, these legislative changes are designed to promote transparency and fairness within the pharmacy benefits management sector, positively impacting pharmacies, pharmacists, and consumers throughout Missouri.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • Massachusetts • Bill
Committee Assignments: Joint Committee on Financial Services
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill establishes a Massachusetts commission to study preferred pharmacy networks and submit a cost-benefit report with recommendations to specified legislative committees and clerks within 12 months after passage.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • Massachusetts • Bill
Committee Assignments: Joint Committee on Financial Services
Summary
AI Overview
The bill establishes limits on “pharmaceutical gag clauses” in pharmacy service contracts in Massachusetts. It prohibits health insurance carriers or pharmacy benefits managers (PBMs) from including any contract terms that prohibit or penalize a pharmacist’s disclosure to an insured person purchasing a covered prescription medication of: (i) the individual’s prescription cost, and (ii) the availability of equivalent medications or alternative purchasing methods (including paying a cash price that may be less expensive than the insured’s covered prescription cost).
The bill also adds a point-of-sale payment limitation: it prohibits a health insurance carrier or PBM from requiring an individual to pay more than the amount the individual would pay for the same prescription if purchased without using the health insurance plan.
Operatively, these requirements apply to contracts for pharmacy services between carriers/PBMs and pharmacies/pharmacists and constrain both contractual speech restrictions and payment practices for covered prescriptions.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • Massachusetts • Bill
Committee Assignments: Joint Committee on Financial Services • Joint Committee on Rules • House Committee on Rules
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill authorizes the Massachusetts House Committee on Financial Services to investigate and study health insurance matters and file its report, recommendations, and any draft legislation with the Clerk of the House by December 31, 2026.
Committee Assignments: House Committee on Health Finance and Policy
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires pharmacy benefit managers to reimburse covered community pharmacies at least NADAC (or WAC if unavailable) plus a 4% ingredient-cost add-on and bars post-adjudication reductions.
Committee Assignments: Senate Committee on Insurance
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires pharmacy benefit managers, after revising formularies at the start of a plan year, to provide insureds a 60-day continuity-of-care period at the same cost.
Committee Assignments: Senate Committee on Insurance
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill limits pharmacy benefit manager compensation to pharmacy benefit management fees for services to Louisiana insurers or health plans and requires annual December 31 compliance certifications.
Committee Assignments: Senate Committee on Insurance
Summary
AI Overview
The bill requires no new reporting framework but expands the scope of the Louisiana Commissioner of Insurance’s audit/examination authority over pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) under the PBM transparency reporting law.
It amends R.S. 22:1870(D)(1) to retain the existing authority for the commissioner to examine a PBM’s books or records to determine the accuracy of the PBM’s transparency report, including access to information about (1) individual amounts paid by a health insurance issuer to the PBM and (2) the individual amounts the PBM paid to a pharmacist or pharmacy for the same drug/device/service.
The key change adds that the commissioner may also examine books or records of any entity within the PBM’s corporate “vertical structure” (vertical integration). The statute gives a non-exhaustive list of entities that may be examined, including the insurer, group purchasing organization, manufacturer, wholesale distributor, special or mail order pharmacy, retail or long-term care pharmacy, and provider.
Committee Assignments: Senate Committee on Insurance
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires pharmacy benefit managers to provide enumerated enrollee, health-plan, and provider duties of care and limits PBM compensation, with the Commissioner empowered to enforce compliance through civil penalties.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • New Hampshire • Bill
Committee Assignments: Senate Committee on Health and Human Services
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires PBMs to quarterly report to the Insurance Commissioner detailed rebate and spread-pricing data on New Hampshire patient utilization, and prohibits PBMs from retaining any portion of spread pricing.
This bill requires pharmacy benefits managers to reimburse eligible pharmacies for covered prescription drugs at acquisition cost plus the Georgia Medicaid professional dispensing fee, excluding such payments from effective rate guarantees.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • New Jersey • Bill
This bill requires the Division of Purchase and Property to procure, without formal advertisement, a pharmacy benefits manager contract and related professional services for SHBP and SEHBP using expedited online reverse-auction and claims-adjudication technologies.
Committee Assignments: Senate Commerce & Human Resources Committee
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires plan sponsors, PBMs, and third-party payers to reimburse independent pharmacies for each dispensed drug at least NADAC plus a CPI-U indexed $12.35 dispensing fee.
Pharmacy Benefits Manager regulation; to substitute "unaffiliated" pharmacy for "independent" pharma... (View full title on source site)
1st Chamber
2nd Chamber
Executive
check_circle_outline
stop_circle
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
Introduced
March 05, 2026
Failed (Senate)
March 05, 2026
Last Action: March 05, 2026 - Read for the first time and referred to the Senate Committee on Banking and Insurance
Failed Sine Die • 2026 Regular Session • Introduced: March 05, 2026
Committee Assignments: Senate Committee on Banking and Insurance
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires PBMs to treat unaffiliated pharmacies as the defined class in all PBM conduct and reimbursement limits, and prohibits reimbursing them below Medicaid rates, cost-sharing recoupment, and certain claims denials.
Committee Assignments: House Insurance Subcommittee • House Committee on Insurance
Summary
AI Overview
The bill prohibits contracting with pharmacy benefits managers (PBMs) that have been disciplined by the Tennessee Department of Finance and Administration or the Tennessee Department of Commerce and Insurance.
Specifically, it directs that TennCare’s bureau may not contract with a PBM if that PBM has been disciplined by either of those two named agencies. It also bars “a committee” from contracting with a PBM under the same condition (discipline by either agency). Separately, it prohibits a PBM from contracting to provide services with any department, agency, or entity of Tennessee if the PBM has been disciplined by either the Department of Finance and Administration or the Department of Commerce and Insurance.
The prohibitions are effective July 1, 2026, and apply to contracts entered into, amended, or renewed on or after that date.
Committee Assignments: House Committee on Insurance • House Insurance Subcommittee
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill prohibits pharmacy benefit managers from reimbursing contracted pharmacies for covered drugs or services below the greatest of actual cost, 105% of NADAC, applicable WAC, or their own affiliate rate.
Committee Assignments: House Committee on Accountability, Efficiency and Transparency • Senate Committee on Government Structure
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill establishes an Occupational Licensure Boards Consolidation Study Committee that must convene within 45 days and issue consolidation recommendations to the Legislature by December 1, 2026.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • South Carolina • Bill
Committee Assignments: House Committee on Labor, Commerce and Industry
Summary
AI Overview
The document outlines amendments to the South Carolina Code of Laws that pertain to the examination of pharmacy benefits managers and pharmacy services administrative organizations. These amendments primarily impact the sectors involved in claims processing and prescription drug coverage.
The director is authorized to conduct examinations or audits of the books and records of these organizations at least once every five years to ensure compliance with the law. Both pharmacy benefits managers and pharmacy services administrative organizations are responsible for covering the costs associated with these examinations.
Information obtained during these examinations is considered proprietary and confidential, and it is exempt from the South Carolina Freedom of Information Act. The act will take effect upon approval by the Governor.
Committee Assignments: Senate Committee on Commerce and Labor
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires pharmacy benefit managers to reimburse contracted pharmacies at or above the applicable minimum reimbursement standard, applies appeal findings to remaining refills, and mandates double payment when underpayment is proven.
Committee Assignments: Senate Committee on Commerce and Labor
Summary
AI Overview
The bill establishes additional limits on contracting with pharmacy benefits managers (PBMs) by state entities. It prohibits the Bureau of TennCare from contracting with a PBM that has been disciplined by either the Tennessee Department of Finance and Administration or the Tennessee Department of Commerce and Insurance, and it creates parallel contracting restrictions for a committee (in Title 8, Chapter 27, Part 1) and for state departments, agencies, and entities.
Specifically, TennCare is barred from contracting with such a PBM regardless of existing contracting authority language, and the same “no contract” condition is applied to a committee’s PBM contracting. In Title 56, Chapter 7, Part 31, a PBM is also prohibited from contracting to provide services to any department, agency, or other entity of Tennessee if the PBM has been disciplined by the specified two state departments.
The bill sets an effective date of July 1, 2026, and applies the restrictions to contracts entered into, amended, or renewed on or after that date.
Committee Assignments: House Committee on Health Finance and Policy
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill prohibits pharmacy benefit managers from engaging in spread pricing in Minnesota and requires them to provide fiduciary and pricing transparency, reimbursement protections, and MAC and appeal procedures.
Committee Assignments: Senate State and Local Government Committee
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires the commissioner of management and budget, with an actuarial consultant, to compare actual electronically adjudicated drug costs to a projected baseline and report results by March 1, 2025.
Committee Assignments: House Committee on State Government Finance and Policy
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires the commissioner of management and budget, using an actuarial consultant, to compare specified prescription-drug-cost data and report results to the legislative auditor and committees by March 1, 2025.
This bill requires covered insurers and governmental employer plans to calculate prescription-drug cost sharing at point of sale using at least 85% of expected rebates, and to annually certify compliance to the superintendent.
Last Action: February 19, 2026 - This bill failed to pass as per the legislature website. The action date is system generated by FiscalNote and set to 1 day after the most recent action.
Failed • 2026-2027 Regular Session • Introduced: January 14, 2026
Committee Assignments: House Subcommittee #5 • House Labor and Commerce Committee
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill prohibits carriers and pharmacy benefits managers from conducting spread pricing in Virginia and imposes PBM contract, disclosure, and reporting duties to ensure compliant pharmacy network and pricing practices.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • New Jersey • Bill
Committee Assignments: Assembly State and Local Government Committee
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires the Division of Pensions and Benefits to conduct recurring pharmacy benefits manager contract and performance reviews for SHBP and SEHBP, publishing online reports 30 days after each review concludes.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • New Jersey • Bill
This bill prohibits pharmacy benefits managers and health insurance carriers from requiring covered persons to use mail-order distributors and from steering prescriptions to affiliated pharmacies, while imposing a 10% surcharge for steering practices.
Independent Pharmacy Access and Resilience Pilot Program; established, report, sunset.
label_outlinePharmacy Deserts
1st Chamber
2nd Chamber
Executive
check_circle_outline
stop_circle
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
Introduced
January 11, 2026
Failed (House)
February 19, 2026
Last Action: February 19, 2026 - This bill failed to pass as per the legislature website. The action date is system generated by FiscalNote and set to 1 day after the most recent action.
Failed • 2026-2027 Regular Session • Introduced: January 11, 2026
Committee Assignments: House Health Subcommittee • House Appropriations Committee • House Health and Human Services Committee • House Health and Human Resources Subcommittee • House Subcommittee #5
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires the Virginia Department of Health to conduct a fiscal year 2026–2027 pre-implementation phase identifying pharmacy-access limited communities using specified criteria and producing a Program planning report.
Pharmacy freedom of choice; specialty pharmacy benefits.
label_outlineSpecialty Pharmacy
label_outlineFair Pharmacy Audits
1st Chamber
2nd Chamber
Executive
check_circle_outline
stop_circle
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
Introduced
January 14, 2026
Failed (House)
February 19, 2026
Last Action: February 19, 2026 - This bill failed to pass as per the legislature website. The action date is system generated by FiscalNote and set to 1 day after the most recent action.
Failed • 2026-2027 Regular Session • Introduced: January 14, 2026
Committee Assignments: House Subcommittee #5 • House Labor and Commerce Committee
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires certain payers and pharmacy benefits managers to allow covered persons to select any pharmacy of their choice, including nonpreferred specialty pharmacies, if the pharmacy meets reimbursement-agreement requirements.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • New Jersey • Bill
This bill requires entities auditing a pharmacy’s prescription or claims records to give at least 14 days’ advance notice with a comprehensive claim list by prescription number and follow specified audit limits and reporting timelines.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • New Jersey • Bill
The bill establishes limits on how pharmacy benefits managers (PBMs) may manage prescription dispensing for covered persons. In connection with contracts or arrangements with private health insurers, prescription benefit plans, the State Health Benefits Program, or the School Employees’ Health Benefits Program, a PBM is prohibited from requiring covered persons to use a mail service pharmacy or from automatically enrolling covered persons in a mail service pharmacy program.
The bill allows PBMs to use mail service pharmacies only if the covered person is offered a choice between a mail service pharmacy and a non-mail service pharmacy, and the covered person gives written consent to the use of the mail service pharmacy.
Committee Assignments: House Committee on Insurance • House Insurance Subcommittee
Summary
AI Overview
The commissioner of commerce and insurance must publish, using existing resources, a report due on or before October 1, 2026. The report must compile and present data on violations of Tennessee Code Annotated § 56-7-3124 that were reported to the commissioner and alleged to have occurred during the fiscal year ending June 30, 2026. The report must include (1) the total number of reported violations, (2) the commissioner’s findings resulting from investigations of the alleged violations, and (3) the penalties imposed by the commissioner on pharmacy benefits managers found to have violated § 56-7-3124. The commissioner must submit a copy of the report to the chief clerk of the Senate, the chief clerk of the House of Representatives, and the legislative librarian, and the report may be published and delivered electronically.
The act takes effect upon becoming law, with the public welfare requiring it.
Committee Assignments: House Committee on Health and Human Services
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill prohibits pharmacy benefit managers and health-care consultants from knowingly making false or misleading claims about lawful prescription drug optimized sourcing programs when they advise self-insured employers.
The bill establishes a new conflict-of-interest prohibition in New York’s Education Law governing pharmacy ownership and control.
It adds a new Education Law section (Section 6808) subdivision 3 that bars any person, firm, corporation, or association from both (a) owning, operating, controlling, or directing the operation of a pharmacy (in whole or in part) and (b) owning, operating, or controlling a pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) (in whole or in part). It also requires divestment: within three years after the subdivision becomes law, any violator must divest from the ownership, operation, or control of the pharmacy if the violation is based on the prohibited combination described in paragraph (a).
The bill defines “pharmacy benefit manager” by reference to the existing definition in Public Health Law section 280-a. The bill takes effect immediately.
Committee Assignments: House Committee on Health Finance and Policy
Summary
AI Overview
The document outlines significant amendments to Minnesota Statutes 2024, specifically focusing on health care entities and their reporting obligations. Health care entities, including facilities, providers, insurers, and management organizations, are now required to report detailed information regarding ownership and control to the commissioner of health. This includes annual public reports that aim to enhance transparency within the health care sector.
The amendments introduce specific definitions related to health care entities and their operations, which may influence how these organizations manage and disclose their ownership structures. The changes are designed to improve oversight and compliance, ensuring that health care entities operate within a framework that promotes accountability.
While the document does not specify exact monetary impacts, the requirement for comprehensive financial reporting suggests potential administrative costs for compliance. The regulations are expected to affect various business industries, including health insurance, health care delivery, and investment sectors related to health care.
Overall, the amendments aim to strengthen the regulatory framework governing health care entities in Minnesota, enhancing the state's ability to monitor and manage the health care landscape effectively.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • West Virginia • Bill
Committee Assignments: House Committee on Finance • ods::id::79871
Summary
AI Overview
The bill changes provisions within West Virginia’s Public Employees Insurance Act by revising PEIA definitions, contract authority, and PEIA’s investigation/enforcement powers—specifically creating/authorizing a special PEIA investigation unit and clarifying the Insurance Commissioner’s enforcement authority over pharmacy benefit managers. It also directs PEIA to require detailed PBM reporting, cooperation, and new/updated PBM contracting requirements (including reimbursement floors and limits on certain restrictive PBM practices), and it incorporates administrative investigation tools (oaths, subpoenas) and administrative recovery authority for fraud. The operative changes occur in §§5-16-2 (definitions), 5-16-9 (PEIA contract execution and PBM contract terms), and 5-16-12a (inspections/violations/penalties and investigation powers).
Committee Assignments: House Committee on Rules • House Committee on Appropriations • House Committee on Health and Human Services
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill bars pharmacy benefit managers from reimbursing nonaffiliated pharmacists or pharmacies below their actual costs, and requires them to correct noncompliant claims within seven business days after successful appeals.
This bill requires the Maryland Insurance Administration to convene a workgroup to study Maryland’s “specialty drug” definition, and report its findings and recommendations to the Governor and General Assembly by January 1, 2027.
Committee Assignments: Senate Committee on Commerce and Consumer Protection
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill repeals Hawaii’s limits on health and pharmacy benefit plans, authorizing them to impose on community retail pharmacies only those cost-sharing and utilization terms they apply to mail-order pharmacies.
Committee Assignments: House Committee on Health and Human Services • House Committee on Rules
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill bars pharmacy benefit managers from reimbursing Arizona contracted pharmacies for covered drugs or services below acquisition cost, and it requires PBMs administering health-plan claims to follow specified reimbursement and pharmacist-appeal procedures.
This bill makes it unlawful for any person or entity to directly or indirectly own, operate, control, or direct overlapping insurance-company and pharmacy benefit manager and pharmacy interests in New York, and requires divestiture within three years.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • South Carolina • Bill
Committee Assignments: House Committee on Labor, Commerce and Industry
Summary
AI Overview
The document outlines amendments to the South Carolina Code of Laws regarding Pharmacy Benefits Managers (PBMs). The changes aim to enhance transparency and fairness in pharmacy benefit management, which could lead to cost savings for consumers and improved access to medications.
Key amendments prohibit PBMs from engaging in unfair trade practices, conducting spread pricing, and steering patients to pharmacies in which they have an ownership interest without proper disclosure. Additionally, PBMs are restricted from penalizing beneficiaries for using specific pharmacies and from retroactively denying claims after payment has been made.
The amendments also require PBMs to honor maximum allowable cost (MAC) prices and to publicly update MAC lists. Furthermore, they must not delay authorization requests for prescription drugs beyond specified timeframes.
These changes are expected to significantly impact the healthcare and pharmaceutical industries, particularly in how PBMs operate and interact with pharmacies and beneficiaries. The act will take effect upon approval by the Governor.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • West Virginia • Bill
Committee Assignments: Senate Committee on Finance • Senate Committee on Health and Human Resources
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires the Office of the Insurance Commissioner to deliver an annual study on outpatient drug dispensing costs to legislative committees by December 31, 2026, and each year thereafter.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • Massachusetts • Bill
Committee Assignments: Joint Committee on Financial Services
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires pharmacy benefit managers and covered entities to update MAC lists at least every 3 business days and use updated MAC amounts to calculate contracted-pharmacy payments within 2 business days.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • New Jersey • Bill
Committee Assignments: Assembly Financial Institutions and Insurance Committee
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires the Division of Purchase and Property to expedite procurement of New Jersey’s next SHBP and SEHBP PBM contract by soliciting proposals without formal advertisement and selecting three service categories based on specified factors.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • New Jersey • Bill
This bill prohibits pharmacy benefits managers from acquiring any interest in or holding permits to operate pharmacy practice sites under the “New Jersey Pharmacy Practice Act.”
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • South Carolina • Bill
Committee Assignments: House Committee on Labor, Commerce and Industry
Summary
AI Overview
The document presents amendments to the South Carolina Code of Laws that focus on the insurance industry, pharmacy benefits managers, and health maintenance organizations.
One significant change is the increase in penalties for violations by these entities. Non-willful violations will incur fines up to $25,000, while willful violations can result in fines reaching $350,000.
Additionally, the amendments establish a new fee structure for pharmacy benefits managers. The initial application fee will be set at $125,000, accompanied by an annual renewal fee of $10,000.
These changes are set to take effect following the Governor's approval.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • Mississippi • Bill
Committee Assignments: House Committee on State Affairs
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill prohibits health insurers and pharmacy benefit managers from steering covered individuals to in-network pharmacies they or the PBM own and from imposing cost, reimbursement, or preferred-network penalties based on that choice.
Committee Assignments: House Committee on Health • House Committee on Consumer Protection and Commerce
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill prohibits prescription drug benefit managers, plan providers, and third-party payors from discriminating against in-state pharmacies or pharmacists regarding participation, referrals, reimbursement, or indemnification, if the pharmacist acts within license scope.
Last Action: January 29, 2026 - The bill has been marked as inactive on the legislature website and no further activity is expected. The date chosen for this action is system generated by FN and is set to 1 day after the most recent action.
Failed • 2026 Regular Session • Introduced: January 05, 2026
Committee Assignments: Senate Insurance and Financial Institutions Committee • House Public Health Committee
Summary
AI Overview
The bill establishes new prescription-drug disclosure requirements in Indiana law related to generic drugs and the “national average drug acquisition cost.” It requires covered health plans to provide the national average drug acquisition cost for a generic drug to the plan sponsor, and it requires pharmacists or pharmacies to provide that same national average cost on the written materials given to an individual at the point of sale of a generic drug.
The requirements apply within IC 27-1-24.6-6 (added by P.L.216-2025 and modified by this bill). A carve-out is provided: the plan-level requirement in subsection (b) does not apply to (1) hospitals licensed under IC 16-21-2, (2) federally qualified health centers as defined in 42 U.S.C. 1396d(l)(2)(B), or (3) health facilities licensed under IC 16-28. A pharmacist or pharmacy must still provide the national average drug acquisition cost on the point-of-sale written materials for generic drugs.
The bill’s effective date is July 1, 2026.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • Massachusetts • Bill
Committee Assignments: Joint Committee on Financial Services • Joint Committee on Health Care Financing
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires carriers and pharmacy benefit managers to reduce an insured’s cost-sharing at the point of sale by at least 80% of estimated rebates, without creating a point-of-sale credit.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • New Jersey • Bill
This bill requires pharmacy benefits managers operating in New Jersey to report specified prior authorization, step-therapy, denial, and spread-pricing revenue metrics to the Division of Consumer Affairs or Insurance Division.
Committee Assignments: Senate Committee on Committees
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill excludes copayments from “cost sharing” and requires insurers, PBMs, and administrators to calculate insured cost sharing at point of sale by passing through at least 100% of rebates received or estimated.
Committee Assignments: Senate Education and Health Committee • Senate Commerce and Labor Committee
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires the Department of Medical Assistance Services to select and contract by July 1, 2026 with a single third-party administrator as Virginia Medicaid’s statewide pharmacy benefits manager.
Committee Assignments: House Committee on Health • House Committee on Consumer Protection and Commerce
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill amends Hawaii law to remove retail-pharmacy restrictions in pharmacy benefit manager contracts, limiting only terms that would materially interfere with a beneficiary’s chosen community retail access.
Committee Assignments: Senate Committee on Finance • Senate Committee on Rules
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires pharmacy benefit managers and third-party payors to calculate covered individuals’ prescription drug cost sharing at the point of sale using rebates-included reduced prices for covered benefits contracts entered or renewed on or after December 31, 2026.
Last Action: January 16, 2026 - The bill has been marked as inactive on the legislature website and no further activity is expected. The date chosen for this action is system generated by FN and is set to 1 day after the most recent action.
Failed • 2026 Regular Session • Introduced: January 05, 2026
Committee Assignments: Senate Appropriations Committee • Senate Health and Provider Services Committee
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill bars insurers and utilization review entities from using artificial intelligence as the primary basis for adverse determinations and requires clinical peer decisionmaking for appeals.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • New Jersey • Bill
This bill requires pharmacy benefit managers, upon contract execution, renewal, or material term change, to update required pricing sources and formulas every seven calendar days and pay or deny pharmacy claims within 14 days.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • New Jersey • Bill
This bill requires pharmacy benefits managers in New Jersey to reimburse contracted pharmacies at least their drug acquisition cost and independent pharmacies at no less than their acquisition cost.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • South Carolina • Bill
Committee Assignments: House Committee on Labor, Commerce and Industry
Summary
AI Overview
The document outlines amendments to the South Carolina Code of Laws that pertain to compliance examinations for pharmacy services administrative organizations and pharmacy benefits managers. These changes are significant for the pharmacy and healthcare sectors, particularly those involved in prescription drug coverage and claims processing.
The amendments authorize the director of the Department of Insurance to conduct examinations or audits of the financial records of pharmacy services administrative organizations and pharmacy benefits managers at least once every five years. This measure aims to ensure compliance with existing laws governing these entities.
Additionally, the organizations are responsible for covering the costs associated with these examinations, including expenses incurred by the director and examiners. If they do not fulfill this financial obligation, civil action may be pursued to recover the costs.
Furthermore, any information obtained during these examinations is classified as proprietary and confidential, making it exempt from the South Carolina Freedom of Information Act. The amendments will take effect upon approval by the Governor.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • New Jersey • Bill
This bill requires pharmacy benefits managers, when interacting with covered persons, to owe the same duties as the health benefits plan or carrier and to act as fiduciaries for covered persons.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • New Jersey • Bill
The bill amends section 2 of P.L.2023, c.107 (C.17B:27F-1.1) to prohibit a health insurance carrier from obtaining a pharmacy benefits manager (PBM) license, including blocking any carrier from obtaining or renewing a PBM license if the PBM license was issued before the bill’s effective date.
The operative change is achieved by revising subsection 2f to add a prohibition on carriers “from obtaining or renewing” a PBM license, and by placing this prohibition within the existing licensing framework for PBMs established under P.L.2023, c.107.
All other provisions shown in the text reflect existing licensing, application, renewal, standards-setting, restriction, non-transferability, and enforcement authorities/regimes under P.L.2023, c.107, plus technical/transition language for PBMs certified as organized delivery systems under earlier law. The bill sets an immediate effective date.
This bill requires pharmacy benefit managers to hold all funds received for pharmacy benefit management services in trust and use them only under contract or law, including spread-pricing amounts.
This bill requires PBMs, when denying certain reimbursement methodology appeals, to identify an FDA therapeutically equivalent NDC obtainable at or below maximum allowable cost or adjust pricing to allow reverse and rebill of affected claims.
This bill requires pharmacy benefit managers to identify FDA-therapeutically equivalent drugs available to New York pharmacies and, if procurement fails, adjust maximum allowable costs and allow affected claims to be reversed and rebilled.
This bill requires pharmacy benefit managers to include in their annual July 1 reports detailed rebate-contract disclosures, including aggregated rebate flows and the portions passed to health plans versus retained by PBMs.
Committee Assignments: House Governmental Operations Committee
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires the president to procure and enter a state pharmacy benefit manager contract through an online reverse auction when the State contracts for PBM services.
Committee Assignments: House Higher Education Committee
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires nonresident establishments that ship, mail, or deliver prescription drugs or devices into New York to register with the State Education Department, subject to a limited unregistered patient-need exception.
Committee Assignments: House Higher Education Committee
Summary
AI Overview
The bill adds a new prohibition in the New York Education Law covering pharmacy ownership, operation, control, and pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) relationships.
It creates a rule that no person, firm, corporation, or association may both (a) directly or indirectly own, operate, control, or direct the operation of all or any part of a pharmacy and (b) directly or indirectly own, operate, or control all or any part of a pharmacy benefit manager. It also requires that, no later than three years after the new subdivision becomes law, any person or entity violating the prohibition must divest from the ownership, operation, or control of the relevant pharmacy.
For definitional consistency, the bill specifies that “pharmacy benefit manager” has the same meaning as in section 280-a of the Public Health Law. The act takes effect immediately.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • New Hampshire • Bill
Committee Assignments: Senate Committee on Health and Human Services • House Committee on Commerce and Consumer Affairs
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires pharmacy services administrative organizations to provide independent pharmacies PBM contracts and reimbursement information within three calendar days of execution or signing, and makes noncompliance an unfair or deceptive act.
This bill makes it unlawful for any person or entity to directly or indirectly own, operate, control, or direct an insurer, PBM, and pharmacy in overlapping combinations, and requires divestiture within three years.
This bill requires health insurers and pharmacy benefit managers to contract for PBM services using pass-through pricing, disclosing all income sources, prohibiting spread pricing, and remitting excess quarterly to the health care plan.
This bill requires health insurers’ PBM service contracts to use pass-through pricing and prohibts spread pricing, remitting quarterly excess to health plans while requiring PBMs to disclose all relevant financial benefits.
Committee Assignments: House Committee on Health • House Committee on Finance • Senate Committee on Commerce and Consumer Protection • House Committee on Consumer Protection and Commerce
Summary
AI Overview
The bill requires the Legislative Reference Bureau to conduct a study on best practices for regulating pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) and for reducing prescription drug costs for health insurance plan beneficiaries. The study must (1) assess standards and regulations adopted by other states relating to PBMs, and (2) review best practices that reduce prescription drug costs and improve transparency within the health insurance system.
The Legislative Reference Bureau must submit a report of its findings and recommendations—including any proposed legislation—to the Legislature no later than twenty days prior to the convening of the regular session of 2026.
The Act’s stated effective date is December 31, 2050.
Committee Assignments: House Rules Committee • Senate Labor Committee • House Labor Committee
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill allows injured claimants to obtain prescribed medications outside an employer or carrier’s contracted network pharmacy if authorization or reauthorization is not provided within 72 hours under specified circumstances.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • Massachusetts • Bill
Committee Assignments: Joint Committee on Financial Services
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires pharmacy service contracts to pay pharmacies ingredient costs meeting specified MAC or Medicaid-cost criteria and a Medicaid-equivalent dispensing fee, and it mandates timely pharmacy cost appeals.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • Pennsylvania • Bill
The document outlines amendments to the Pharmacy Act in Pennsylvania, focusing on the regulation of pharmacy benefits managers (PBMs) and their ability to operate retail pharmacies. Under the new regulations, PBMs are prohibited from acquiring or holding permits for retail pharmacy operations, a measure designed to prevent conflicts of interest and ensure the independence of pharmacies.
Additionally, the board may issue limited-use permits to pharmacies that provide access to rare or limited-distribution drugs that are otherwise unavailable. This provision allows certain pharmacies to continue operating under specific conditions despite the new restrictions.
The board will assess all permits issued under this section by July 1, 2026, and will notify permit holders who may be in violation of the new regulations. Pharmacies that receive such notifications are required to inform patients and prescribing healthcare providers who have used their services in the past year.
The amendments take effect immediately for certain sections, while the remainder will be effective 60 days from the date of enactment. This legislation is expected to significantly impact the pharmacy industry, particularly in the relationship between pharmacies and PBMs, as well as the availability of medications for patients.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • Massachusetts • Bill
Committee Assignments: Joint Committee on Financial Services
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires the Health Policy Commission to obtain standardized pricing disclosures from selected prescription-drug manufacturers and, within 60 days, determine whether their prices are unreasonable or excessive.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • Massachusetts • Bill
Committee Assignments: Joint Committee on Financial Services
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires PBMs that maintain Massachusetts MAC lists to place drugs only if they meet specified equivalence, availability, and non-obsolescence conditions, and to update the lists within 7 calendar days of qualifying cost changes.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • Massachusetts • Bill
Committee Assignments: House Committee on Ways and Means • Joint Committee on Financial Services
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires carriers and PBMs to provide insureds at least 80% of estimated rebates by reducing point-of-sale cost-sharing, without creating a point-of-sale credit, and mandates annual reporting by April 1.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • Massachusetts • Bill
Committee Assignments: Joint Committee on Financial Services
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires pharmacy benefit managers to include ingredient-cost maximum-allowable-cost criteria and minimum dispensing fees in pharmacy contracts and prohibits retroactive “generic effective rate” reductions.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • Massachusetts • Bill
Committee Assignments: House Committee on Ways and Means • Joint Committee on Financial Services • Joint Committee on Health Care Financing
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires carriers and pharmacy benefit managers to reduce point-of-sale cost-sharing so insureds receive at least 80% of estimated rebates, subject to good-faith estimates, and bans point-of-sale rebate credits.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • Massachusetts • Bill
Committee Assignments: Joint Committee on Financial Services
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires PBMs and covered entities to remove drugs from a maximum allowable cost list within three business days after the drugs no longer meet the required Orange Book and therapeutic-equivalence criteria.
Committee Assignments: House Committee on Rules • Senate Committee on Rules • House Committee on Finance • Senate Committee on Labor and Commerce • Senate Committee on Finance
Summary
AI Overview
The document outlines significant amendments to Alaska's insurance regulations, focusing on various sectors, particularly life insurance, health care, and pharmacy benefits management. Key changes include the introduction of prosecution time limitations for life insurance offenses, enhanced examination authority for the director of insurance, and requirements for health care insurers to offer non-network options during enrollment. Insurers are now mandated to file annual audited financial reports and may seek exemptions if compliance causes financial hardship.
In the health care sector, amendments require insurers to provide coverage for essential health services, such as colorectal cancer screenings, without cost-sharing for individuals at average risk. Insurers are also restricted from denying coverage based solely on an individual's status as an elected official, promoting fair treatment in insurance practices. Additionally, governance changes for health maintenance organizations (HMOs) necessitate a more consumer-representative governing body and require emergency services coverage from non-HMO providers when referred by an HMO provider.
The regulations also enhance consumer protections by requiring written notice for policy cancellations and nonrenewals, while prohibiting certain claims handling practices. Insurers cannot cancel policies based solely on claims made for aid requirements, ensuring that policyholders are not penalized for seeking assistance. Furthermore, new regulations for pharmacy benefits managers emphasize transparency, prohibiting practices such as spread pricing and certain fees from pharmacies.
Amendments related to third-party administrators streamline licensing processes while imposing stricter regulations regarding registration and contractual obligations with insurers. Insurers must demonstrate compliance before issuing group life policies and obtain approval for motor vehicle service contracts prior to delivery. Overall, these regulatory changes aim to improve compliance, enhance consumer protection, and ensure the financial stability of insurers and related entities within Alaska's insurance landscape.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • North Carolina • Bill
Committee Assignments: Senate Health Care Committee • House Committee on Health • Senate Commerce and Insurance Committee • Senate Rules and Operations Committee • Senate Finance Committee • House Committee on Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House
Summary
AI Overview
The General Assembly of North Carolina has enacted comprehensive legislation aimed at enhancing transparency and fairness in the pharmaceutical services sector, particularly benefiting community and independent pharmacies. Key provisions include ensuring that insurers cannot limit a resident's choice of pharmacy, mandating equal treatment of beneficiaries regarding copayments and fees, and prohibiting monetary advantages or penalties that could influence pharmacy selection. Additionally, pharmacies must be given the opportunity to participate as contract providers under the same terms as other pharmacies.
The legislation also introduces regulations for Pharmacy Services Administrative Organizations (PSAOs), requiring them to obtain licenses, disclose ownership interests, and adhere to specific contractual obligations with independent pharmacies. These changes aim to improve the negotiation power of independent pharmacies with third-party payers and enhance operational transparency.
Pharmacy Benefits Managers (PBMs) are subject to new reporting requirements, including annual disclosures of financial metrics and restrictions on reimbursement practices that could disadvantage independent pharmacies. PBMs must act in good faith and ensure that reimbursement rates do not fall below acquisition costs for covered drugs. Furthermore, PBMs are prohibited from imposing fees related to network participation and must allow all licensed pharmacies to join retail pharmacy networks under equal terms.
Consumer protections are also strengthened, with requirements for health insurance companies to adjust cost-sharing calculations based on rebates and for pharmaceutical manufacturers to notify stakeholders of significant price increases. These changes aim to ensure that consumers benefit from rebates at the point of sale and enhance overall transparency in drug pricing.
Lastly, the legislation addresses Medicaid reimbursement rates, establishing that outpatient drug reimbursements will align with Medicaid fee-for-service methodologies and utilize the National Average Drug Acquisition Cost for claims. This comprehensive approach seeks to improve access to pharmacy services, promote fair competition, and enhance the overall integrity of the pharmaceutical supply chain in North Carolina.
Committee Assignments: House Rules Committee • House Police & Fire Committee • Senate Assignments Committee
Summary
AI Overview
The document outlines significant amendments to Illinois law, focusing on health benefits, pharmacy regulations, and the administration of correctional facilities. Key changes include enhanced health benefit requirements that mandate coverage for post-mastectomy care and various health conditions, alongside the establishment of a new fund to support municipal development projects aimed at reducing food insecurity. Additionally, the Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity (DCEO) is authorized to promote access to pharmacies, particularly in underserved areas, which may financially benefit local pharmacies serving low-income populations.
Regulations affecting pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) and health benefit plans are also highlighted, emphasizing transparency in drug pricing and reimbursement practices. PBMs are required to update pricing information regularly, allow pharmacies to appeal pricing decisions, and undergo annual audits. Furthermore, contracts with PBMs must not discriminate against 340B entities or pharmacies, ensuring equitable treatment in reimbursement and access to drugs.
The document also addresses the establishment of a critical access care pharmacy program to support pharmacies in underserved areas, with a focus on financial sustainability and compliance with healthcare regulations. This program aims to enhance access to essential pharmacy services for communities with limited resources.
In the realm of correctional facilities, the document introduces a diversion program for parole violators, provisions for gang management, and the establishment of super-maximum security institutions. It emphasizes the need for healthcare contracts to be awarded to qualified providers and mandates the provision of lactation rooms for nursing mothers within correctional facilities.
Overall, these amendments are poised to significantly impact the healthcare, pharmacy, and correctional industries in Illinois, with a focus on improving access to services, ensuring fair practices, and enhancing the management of inmate populations.
Committee Assignments: House Committee on Health • Senate Committee on Insurance and Labor
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires insurers to reimburse pharmacies for self-administered drugs under the state health plan beginning January 1, 2026, at specified average-based amounts plus minimum dispensing fees.
Committee Assignments: House Finance Committee • Senate Finance Committee
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires political subdivisions to adopt cybersecurity programs aligned with recognized best practices and to notify officials of covered cybersecurity incidents within specified days.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • California • Bill
The document outlines significant amendments to health care regulations in California, focusing on enhancing access and equity for marginalized communities, particularly transgender, gender nonconforming, and intersex individuals. Key changes include the establishment of the Transgender, Gender Nonconforming, and Intersex (TGI) Wellness and Equity Fund, which will provide ongoing financial support for health care programs, and an increase in financial eligibility standards for accessing medications to 600% of the federal poverty level by 2025. Additionally, large group disability insurance policies will be required to cover infertility diagnosis and treatment without discrimination based on gender identity or sexual orientation.
Modifications to the Medi-Cal program include changes to eligibility determinations, with new resource disregards and the removal of prior authorization for hospice services by 2027. The amendments aim to streamline access to health care services for vulnerable populations, including those with disabilities and low-income individuals. New benefits will be introduced, such as nonmedical transportation and rapid whole genome sequencing for young children, expanding the range of services available to Medi-Cal beneficiaries.
The document also addresses reimbursement policies for Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) and Rural Health Clinics (RHCs), allowing for adjustments to reimbursement rates based on changes in the scope of services provided. Telehealth services will be expanded, requiring these centers to offer both video and audio-only interactions, thereby enhancing access to healthcare services. Furthermore, changes to Medi-Cal managed care enrollment requirements will streamline processes and ensure that non-dual-eligible beneficiaries receive necessary healthcare services.
In addition, the document emphasizes the need for improved access to behavioral health services, particularly for children and youth, and imposes new responsibilities on local agencies regarding Medi-Cal eligibility. Enhanced patient privacy protections and timely reporting of breaches related to medical information are also highlighted, alongside the requirement for pharmacy benefit managers to obtain licenses and provide data on drug pricing starting in 2027.
Overall, these amendments aim to improve health care access, enhance patient care standards, and ensure compliance within the health care system, with a focus on promoting equity and improving access to essential health care services for all Californians.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • California • Bill
The document outlines significant amendments to California's health laws, focusing on enhancing healthcare access, equity, and quality for various populations, including marginalized groups such as transgender, gender nonconforming, and intersex individuals, as well as low-income and disabled persons. Key changes include the establishment of the TGI Wellness and Equity Fund to support organizations serving TGI communities, and the requirement for large group disability insurance policies to cover infertility diagnosis and treatment, ensuring equitable access regardless of gender identity or sexual orientation.
Modifications to the Medi-Cal program aim to expand benefits and services for recipients, including the introduction of nonmedical transportation, coverage for rapid whole genome sequencing for infants, and the provision of home test kits for STDs. Additionally, violence prevention services and community health worker services will be covered, enhancing access to healthcare for vulnerable populations. Changes to reimbursement policies for Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) and Rural Health Clinics (RHCs) will also improve financial operations and service delivery models.
The amendments further address the regulation of pharmacy benefit managers, requiring them to register and comply with new operational standards, including financial reporting and the establishment of a Pharmacy Benefit Manager Fund. Skilled nursing facilities will be mandated to ensure preparedness for power outages, reflecting a focus on operational resilience within the healthcare system.
Changes to Medi-Cal eligibility criteria include the removal of resource considerations for non-MAGI cases and the introduction of a disregard for certain nonexempt property. The bill also mandates that Medi-Cal managed care plans cover COVID-19-related services without cost-sharing and eliminates prior authorization requirements for hospice services. These adjustments aim to streamline eligibility determinations and enhance the efficiency of the Medi-Cal program.
Overall, these amendments reflect a comprehensive effort to improve healthcare access, promote equity, and ensure that vulnerable populations receive necessary support and services in California. The changes are expected to impact healthcare providers, community organizations, and insurance companies, necessitating adjustments in operations and service delivery to align with the new regulations.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • Massachusetts • Bill
Committee Assignments: Senate Committee on Ways and Means
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill allocates supplemental FY 2025 appropriations to Massachusetts programs and revises MassHealth and related payment rules, creating an Inspector General Recovery Fund and imposing Section 2A operational conditions.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • Massachusetts • Bill
Committee Assignments: Senate Committee on Ways and Means • Joint Committee on Health Care Financing
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires the Office of Health Resource Planning to conduct a focused assessment of pharmacy and pharmacological service supply, identify pharmacy deserts using specified access thresholds, and submit findings by September 1, 2026.
The document outlines significant amendments to Minnesota Statutes that impact healthcare, environmental services, and child welfare. Key changes include increased licensing and registration fees for health maintenance organizations and new requirements for well disclosure certificates, which mandate property sellers to disclose known well locations. Healthcare providers will face enhanced reporting obligations related to drug pricing and telehealth services, while stricter regulations for occupational therapy and midwifery practices emphasize education and ethical standards.
In the healthcare sector, a county-administered program aims to integrate healthcare and social services in rural communities, improving access to care. Changes to reimbursement structures for various healthcare providers, including adjustments for telehealth and nonemergency medical transportation, are also highlighted. Additionally, the document addresses child welfare reforms that focus on improving support systems for children in foster care and enhancing engagement with noncustodial parents, including detailed transition plans for youth aging out of the system.
The amendments also introduce significant changes to child care and mental health services. Enhanced security measures for licensed child care centers, such as mandatory video surveillance, and regular eligibility assessments for families receiving child care assistance are key highlights. In the mental health sector, initiatives like the Mental Health Collaboration Hub Pilot Project and targeted funding for crisis intervention services aim to improve care pathways for individuals facing mental health challenges.
Further appropriations for health and human services include substantial funding for General Assistance, Emergency General Assistance, and Minnesota Supplemental Aid Grants, with a focus on mental health services, substance use treatment, and public health initiatives. Additional funding is allocated for early childhood education, literacy programs, scholarships, and youth intervention initiatives, as well as emergency medical services to enhance training and operational capabilities.
Overall, these amendments and funding allocations reflect a comprehensive effort to enhance regulatory frameworks, improve service delivery, and address disparities across multiple sectors in Minnesota, with a strong emphasis on accountability, transparency, and the well-being of vulnerable populations.
Committee Assignments: House Engrossed Bills Committee • Joint Committee on Health Coverage, Insurance and Financial Services
Summary
AI Overview
The State of Maine has enacted a new law that prohibits carriers and pharmacy benefits managers from utilizing spread pricing in their operations. This practice involves charging more than the actual ingredient cost of a prescription drug plus the dispensing fee, minus any pharmacy benefits management fee. The law primarily impacts the pharmacy benefits management industry and health insurance carriers operating within the state.
The legislation aims to ensure that the fees charged by pharmacy benefits managers align more closely with the actual value of the services provided. This change is expected to lead to potential cost savings for consumers and health plans.
The prohibition on spread pricing will apply to contracts entered into or renewed starting January 1, 2026. Additionally, carriers and pharmacy benefits managers will be required to submit annual compliance certifications beginning December 31, 2026, with subsequent certifications due each year thereafter.
It is important to note that the law does not apply to the MaineCare program. Furthermore, the section of the law regarding spread pricing is set to be repealed on January 1, 2031.
The document outlines significant regulatory changes affecting pharmacy benefits managers (PBMs), pharmacies, and prescription drug pricing in Iowa. Key provisions include the requirement for PBMs to adopt pass-through pricing, ensuring that payments to them for prescription drugs match what they pay pharmacies. Additionally, non-discrimination provisions prohibit PBMs and health carriers from treating pharmacies unfairly regarding participation and reimbursement, provided they adhere to state laws.
Consumer protections are enhanced, allowing individuals to choose their preferred pharmacy without facing higher costs for retail services compared to mail-order options. PBMs must also inform pharmacies of any participation restrictions at least 60 days in advance. Furthermore, PBMs are mandated to reimburse retail pharmacies at least the national average drug acquisition cost or the wholesale acquisition cost, along with a professional dispensing fee.
Transparency is a focal point of the new regulations, as PBMs are required to submit quarterly reports on reimbursement rates and publish these on their public websites for two years. An appeals process for pharmacies is also established, ensuring timely responses from PBMs regarding any appeals.
In a related initiative, by January 1, 2026, the commissioner of insurance will review pharmacy services administrative organizations and the wholesale distribution of prescription drugs. This review will culminate in a report to the general assembly, analyzing the supply chain, market dynamics, and the relationships between various stakeholders while maintaining the confidentiality of sensitive information.
These changes aim to enhance transparency, reduce costs for consumers, and ensure fair treatment of pharmacies, significantly impacting the pharmacy industry in Iowa.
The document outlines a series of amendments to Minnesota Statutes that aim to enhance public health, safety, and accountability across various sectors, particularly healthcare, environmental services, and child welfare. Key changes include increased licensing fees for health maintenance organizations and medical services, reflecting rising administrative costs. New fee structures for ionizing radiation services and home care providers are introduced to improve compliance and safety standards.
In the healthcare sector, the amendments emphasize transparency and accountability, particularly in pharmaceutical regulations, requiring drug manufacturers and pharmacies to report pricing and financial disclosures. New guidelines for telehealth services and nonemergency medical transportation are established to improve access to care. Additionally, changes to reimbursement rates for various healthcare services, including mental health and dental services, aim to enhance funding and access.
The amendments also focus on child welfare, introducing extended eligibility for foster care and detailed transition plans for youth aging out of the system. New training requirements for licensed child foster care providers are established to improve care for infants and young children, while courts are mandated to prioritize the best interests of children in custody proceedings. The importance of notifying relatives about foster care placements and developing concurrent permanency planning strategies is emphasized.
Furthermore, the amendments introduce new regulations for child care assistance, including adjustments to authorizations based on activity schedules and a revised parent fee schedule. Enhanced safety measures in child care settings are implemented through stricter background study requirements and compliance monitoring for providers receiving public funding. Significant funding allocations are made for health and human services programs, including mental health initiatives and child care assistance.
Overall, these regulatory changes and funding allocations reflect a comprehensive effort to improve the quality of services provided to children and families, enhance safety and oversight in child care, and support public health initiatives across Minnesota, ensuring that vulnerable populations receive the necessary resources and support.
Committee Assignments: Select Committee on Committees • Committee on Banking, Commerce and Insurance • Select Committee on Enrollment and Review
Summary
AI Overview
The recent regulations significantly reshape the landscape for pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs), specialty pharmacies, and retail pharmacies, focusing on enhancing transparency and fairness in the pharmacy benefit management industry. Key provisions prohibit PBMs from engaging in practices such as spread pricing, which involves charging different prices for drugs than what is paid to pharmacies. Additionally, PBMs cannot restrict covered persons from choosing their network pharmacist or pharmacy, nor can they transfer prescriptions without the covered person's request.
Specialty pharmacies are required to hold accreditation from recognized organizations to participate in PBM networks and must comply with federal shipping regulations. PBMs are mandated to treat affiliated and unaffiliated specialty pharmacies equally, ensuring that terms and conditions are consistent. Furthermore, PBMs cannot impose excessive data reporting requirements on specialty pharmacies and must establish appeal processes for healthcare providers regarding the use of specialty pharmacies.
Retail pharmacies are granted rights to decline drug provision if the payment is below acquisition cost and must inform covered persons about alternative options. They can also offer delivery services without penalties from PBMs, provided they disclose any associated fees. The regulations also allow health benefit plans and PBMs to auto-enroll covered persons in mail-order services for maintenance medications after a specified period, while ensuring that consumers are informed about lower-cost options.
The overarching aim of these regulations is to improve the quality of care and protect covered persons from undue financial burdens while fostering a more equitable relationship between pharmacies and PBMs. The changes are expected to have a significant impact on the pharmacy and healthcare industries, particularly in terms of pricing practices and consumer choice in prescription drug services.
This bill prohibits, beginning January 1, 2027, any unlicensed person from knowingly soliciting a plan sponsor to act as a pharmacy benefit manager or from providing pharmacy benefit manager services.
Committee Assignments: Senate Committee on Business and Insurance • House Committee on Health and Human Services Oversight • House Committee on Public Health
Summary
AI Overview
The document outlines significant amendments to the regulations governing pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) in Oklahoma, focusing on enhancing transparency and compliance within the pharmacy benefits management sector. These changes primarily impact PBMs, pharmacies, health insurers, and healthcare providers, aiming to create a fairer operational landscape.
Key provisions require PBMs to disclose aggregate prescription drug discounts, manufacturer rebates, and audit recoupments to insurers and clients. Additionally, PBMs must report quarterly to the Attorney General on various financial metrics, including total rebates received and distributed, as well as payments made to pharmacies. The Attorney General and other stakeholders are granted audit rights to access PBM contracts and utilization data, ensuring accountability in the industry.
The regulations also emphasize the importance of protecting patient information, mandating that PBMs provide protected health information (PHI) to the Attorney General while adhering to privacy laws. Non-compliance with these regulations can lead to civil penalties and other enforcement actions by the Attorney General.
Furthermore, the document specifies that if a PBM fails to comply with final orders issued by the Attorney General, it may face significant consequences, including daily fines for non-payment and potential suspension of its operating license. The Attorney General is empowered to collect fines and restitution, with funds directed to support affected pharmacists and patients.
Overall, these amendments aim to improve the operational practices of PBMs in Oklahoma, fostering a more transparent and equitable environment for all stakeholders involved in pharmacy benefits management.
Committee Assignments: House Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety Oversight • Senate Committee on Business and Insurance • House Committee on Civil Judiciary
Summary
AI Overview
The document outlines amendments to the Unfair Claims Settlement Practices Act in Oklahoma, focusing on insurer practices related to claim settlements. One significant change is the reduction of the allowable time for filing claims for roof damage caused by wind or hail to a maximum of twenty-four months after the date of loss, with claims permitted after the first anniversary of the loss.
These amendments primarily impact the insurance industry, particularly property and health insurance sectors. Insurers are now required to adopt reasonable standards for prompt investigations and must provide clear disclosures to claimants regarding their policies.
Additionally, insurers may experience increased operational costs due to the necessity of maintaining detailed records of complaints and the potential for higher claims payouts resulting from the new filing timelines and settlement practices.
The changes are designed to enhance consumer protection and ensure fair treatment of claimants throughout the insurance process. The amendments will take effect on November 1, 2025.
Committee Assignments: Senate Committee on Business and Insurance • House Committee on Health and Human Services Oversight • House Committee on Public Health
Summary
AI Overview
The document outlines significant amendments to regulations governing pharmacy audits and the responsibilities of pharmacy benefits managers (PBMs) in their interactions with pharmacies. Key provisions include requirements for audit notifications, which mandate that pharmacies receive written notice at least 14 calendar days in advance, and a limit on the number of prescriptions that can be audited each year. Additionally, pharmacies are allowed to address discrepancies found during audits and can reverse and resubmit claims within a specified timeframe.
The amendments also establish clear guidelines regarding recoupment provisions, stating that funds cannot be recouped for clerical errors unless there is evidence of intent to commit fraud. Pharmacies are entitled to submit amended claims electronically to correct such errors, and if paper records are requested during an audit, the auditing entity must reimburse pharmacies for copying costs.
Furthermore, PBMs are required to provide detailed contact information in claim responses and must transmit network reimbursement identification information. The regulations prohibit effective rate contracting, ensuring that payment agreements between pharmacies and PBMs do not establish reimbursement based on effective rates.
These changes aim to enhance transparency and fairness in pharmacy audits, reduce financial burdens on pharmacies, and improve operational efficiency within the pharmacy and healthcare industries. Overall, the amendments are designed to foster a more equitable relationship between pharmacies and PBMs, ultimately benefiting the healthcare system as a whole.
Committee Assignments: Senate Committee on Business and Insurance • House Committee on Health and Human Services Oversight • House Committee on Public Health
Summary
AI Overview
The document outlines significant amendments to regulations affecting pharmacy benefits managers (PBMs) and pharmacies, focusing on audit procedures, reimbursement practices, and protections for pharmacies. Key changes include requirements for PBMs to provide written notice before conducting audits, limitations on the scope and frequency of audits, and clarifications regarding clerical errors that will not be deemed fraudulent unless intent is proven.
Additionally, the amendments establish financial protections for pharmacies, prohibiting PBMs from imposing fines or penalties without valid recoupment and ensuring that any recouped funds are refunded to patients when applicable. The regulations also mandate that audits conducted by third-party companies must follow specific processes, including timely reporting of findings and restrictions on recoupment until the appeals process is complete.
Further provisions address the reimbursement rates for pharmacies, requiring PBMs to adhere to specific pricing metrics and ensuring fair drug placement on Maximum Allowable Cost (MAC) lists. PBMs are also prohibited from requiring additional accreditations beyond state and federal mandates, simplifying the process for pharmacies to participate in the network.
In the event of a disaster declaration, audit activities are suspended for affected pharmacies, with specific exemptions for fraud-related audits. The document emphasizes the need for transparency in the appeals process for reimbursement amounts and outlines the responsibilities of PBMs in updating pricing and providing contact information for MAC appeals.
Overall, these amendments aim to create a more equitable environment for pharmacies, enhancing their financial stability and protecting them from unfair audit practices while ensuring compliance with established standards.
Committee Assignments: Senate Committee on Labor and Commerce • Senate Committee on Health and Social Services • House Committee on Rules • House Committee on Health and Social Services • Senate Committee on Rules
Summary
AI Overview
The document outlines significant amendments to Alaska's insurance regulations, particularly focusing on the licensing and oversight of pharmacy benefits managers (PBMs) and third-party administrators (TPAs). Key changes include the establishment of examination authority for the director of insurance, allowing for thorough scrutiny of the operations and transactions of these entities. Entities undergoing examination will be responsible for covering associated costs, although waivers may be granted in cases of financial hardship.
Licensing requirements have been clarified, with specific exemptions for certain applicants, including those with limited licenses and individuals previously licensed in good standing. TPAs must adhere to strict licensing protocols, including demonstrating trustworthiness and relevant experience, while also being required to notify the director of significant operational changes. Insurers are prohibited from engaging with unlicensed TPAs, reinforcing the need for compliance within the industry.
The amendments also address the contractual relationship between insurers and TPAs, mandating transparency in financial transactions and record-keeping. TPAs are required to provide detailed accounts of transactions and maintain fiduciary responsibilities regarding collected funds. Additionally, contracts must outline underwriting details and claims administration processes, ensuring clarity and accountability in these relationships.
For PBMs, the regulations emphasize the necessity of licensing and compliance with operational standards. PBMs must notify the director of any changes to their licensing information and are required to renew their licenses biennially. Consumer protections have been strengthened, prohibiting practices that interfere with pharmacy choice and ensuring transparency in claims processing.
Overall, these regulatory changes aim to enhance oversight and accountability within the insurance and healthcare sectors, particularly concerning the operations of TPAs and PBMs, thereby promoting a more transparent and compliant industry environment.
Committee Assignments: Senate Committee on Commerce and Labor
Summary
AI Overview
This legislative segment establishes regulations for pharmacy benefits managers (PBMs) in Tennessee, focusing on claims processing and payment standards. PBMs are required to process and pay clean claims within 30 days for paper claims and 14 days for electronic claims, providing either the full covered amount or notification of reasons for partial or non-payment, including necessary documentation. If PBMs fail to meet these deadlines, they are subject to a 1% interest penalty per month on the unpaid amount.
The legislation grants oversight authority to the commissioner, who can enforce compliance through various measures, including issuing cease and desist orders, conducting examinations, and imposing penalties based on the percentage of claims properly processed and paid annually. Penalties range from $10,000 to $200,000, with provisions for administrative hearings and injunctive relief.
Additionally, the act amends existing statutes to require that findings from an appeal regarding reimbursement rates and actual costs for specific drugs, medical products, or devices be applied to all remaining refills of the same prescription if the reimbursement aligns with the appeal. The legislation emphasizes that headings are for reference only and requests their inclusion in official publications.
The act becomes effective upon enactment, contingent on the public welfare, and aims to improve transparency and accountability in pharmacy benefits management, impacting healthcare providers, pharmacies, and medical suppliers, particularly concerning reimbursement practices for prescription drugs and medical devices.
Committee Assignments: House Committee on Health and Social Services • House Committee on Labor and Commerce
Summary
AI Overview
The document outlines significant amendments to regulations governing pharmacy benefits managers (PBMs) and third-party administrators (TPAs) in Alaska, focusing on licensing, examination authority, and compliance requirements. The director of insurance is empowered to examine the operations of PBMs and TPAs, with the entities responsible for covering examination costs unless financial hardship is demonstrated. Additionally, specific licensing requirements are established for both PBMs and TPAs, ensuring that they operate under defined statutory provisions.
Key changes include exemptions from licensing for certain applicants, the expiration and renewal processes for licenses, and the necessity for third-party administrators to maintain compliance with licensing standards. Individuals not required to be licensed must file annual certifications to confirm their exempt status. The amendments emphasize accountability and transparency, mandating that applicants disclose ownership structures and provide comprehensive organizational documents.
Further provisions require written contracts between insurers and TPAs to outline responsibilities and financial management practices, including fiduciary duties regarding collected funds. TPAs must also adhere to reporting requirements, submitting information to the director on a quarterly basis. For PBMs, licensing procedures include the designation of a compliance officer and the submission of financial statements to demonstrate solvency.
Overall, these regulatory changes aim to enhance oversight and accountability within the insurance and healthcare sectors, impacting how PBMs and TPAs conduct their business. The effective date for these changes is set for January 1, 2026.
Committee Assignments: House Insurance Subcommittee • House Committee on Insurance • House Committee on Government Operations • House Committee on Calendar and Rules
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires pharmacy benefits managers to pay or complete required prompt-pay actions on clean claims within 30 days for paper and 14 days for electronic submissions.
The bill establishes the Iowa Competitive Pharmacy Benefits Managers Marketplace Act by adding a new section 8A.319. This section requires the Department of Administrative Services to procure a technology platform and related services to conduct pharmacy benefits manager reverse auctions for self-funded public sector health plans. The procurement must be completed before November 1, 2025, with contracts awarded starting January 1, 2026, and subsequent contracts awarded no later than three months prior to current contract expiration. Self-funded public sector health plans are permitted to conduct future auctions three years after the initial contract. The act sets specific procedures for conducting auctions, evaluating bids, and ensuring cost savings, including provisions for market checks and the possibility of vacating auction outcomes if the lowest bid exceeds projected cost trends. Definitions needed for key terms include "pharmacy benefits manager," "pharmacy benefits manager reverse auction," "self-funded public sector health plan," and "market check." The changes are effective upon enactment.
This legislation introduces comprehensive regulations aimed at pharmacy benefits managers (PBMs), pharmacies, and prescription drug pricing in Iowa. It emphasizes transparency and fairness in the interactions between PBMs and pharmacies, ensuring that reimbursement practices are equitable and accessible.
Key provisions include a prohibition on PBMs imposing additional educational or certification requirements on pharmacies beyond state regulations. Furthermore, PBMs cannot designate prescription drugs as specialty drugs to limit access or mandate the exclusive use of mail-order pharmacies. Third-party payors are required to notify pharmacies of any participation restrictions well in advance and must offer uniform reimbursement terms to all eligible pharmacies.
The legislation mandates that cost-sharing for prescriptions be calculated at the point of sale, incorporating all rebates received by health carriers or PBMs, with patient payments counting towards their deductibles. PBMs are also required to reimburse pharmacies at least the national average drug acquisition cost or the Iowa average acquisition cost, along with a professional dispensing fee based on the Iowa Medicaid enterprise provider fee schedule.
Additionally, contracts between PBMs and third-party payors must adopt a pass-through pricing model, ensuring that any differences in pricing are fully passed through to pharmacies. An appeals process must be established for pharmacies to contest reimbursement rates for specific prescriptions, enhancing the overall fairness of the reimbursement system.
Overall, these changes are set to significantly impact the pharmacy and healthcare industries, particularly in how pharmacies are reimbursed for their services, promoting consumer choice and improving the transparency of drug pricing.
Committee Assignments: House Committee on Health Care • Senate Committee on Finance
Summary
AI Overview
The State of Vermont has enacted comprehensive changes to its health insurance regulations, significantly impacting insurers, healthcare providers, and consumers. Key provisions include enhanced consumer protections, such as prohibiting unfair discrimination in premium rates and benefits, ensuring compliance with federal laws, and mandating clear communication regarding claims processing. Insurers are required to file premium rates with the Green Mountain Care Board for review, and group health insurance policies must provide equal benefits to part-time employees while eliminating exclusions for preexisting conditions.
The regulations also focus on equitable coverage for Medicare supplement policies, ensuring that dependent children receive necessary health benefits until the age of 26. Essential services, including gender-affirming care, mental health treatment, and prescription drug coverage, are mandated without imposing greater cost-sharing than for other health conditions. Transparency is emphasized, with provisions for public access to information regarding rate filings and an external review process for coverage decisions.
Significant amendments include enhanced coverage for cancer screenings, telemedicine services, and the recognition of diverse healthcare providers. Health insurance plans must cover various cancer treatments and reimburse telemedicine services at rates comparable to in-person consultations. Additionally, licensed athletic trainers and vision care professionals are ensured equitable reimbursement, promoting fair access to care.
The regulations introduce stricter filing and reporting requirements for health insurers, reinforcing non-discrimination policies and enhancing regulatory oversight. Changes to out-of-pocket limits for prescription drugs in bronze-level plans aim to support individuals with high prescription drug needs, ensuring they are automatically reenrolled in compliant plans.
Overall, these comprehensive changes aim to create a more equitable and transparent health insurance landscape in Vermont, enhancing access to necessary healthcare services while promoting consumer protection and compliance with state and federal regulations.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • North Carolina • Bill
Committee Assignments: House Regulatory Reform Committee • House Committee on Health • House Committee on Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House • Senate Rules and Operations Committee
Summary
AI Overview
The General Assembly of North Carolina has enacted new regulations aimed at pharmacy benefits managers (PBMs) to enhance transparency and fairness in the pharmaceutical services sector. Key provisions prohibit PBMs from charging insurers a price for prescription drugs that exceeds what they pay pharmacies, ensuring that reimbursement rates are equitable. Additionally, PBMs are barred from imposing fees on pharmacies related to network participation and cannot retroactively deny claims for pharmacist services without meeting specific conditions.
The legislation also introduces reporting requirements for PBMs, mandating quarterly disclosures of financial data, including wholesale acquisition costs and concessions received from manufacturers. These measures are designed to provide greater insight into the financial practices of PBMs and their impact on drug pricing.
Consumer protections are strengthened, allowing patients to choose their pharmacies without facing higher copayments or penalties from insurers. This aims to foster competition among pharmacies and stabilize their income by ensuring that reimbursement rates are not adversely affected by a beneficiary's pharmacy choice.
Furthermore, the regulations address the auditing practices of PBMs, limiting the frequency and scope of audits conducted on retail pharmacies. Pharmacies will receive advance notice of audits and must be informed of the basis for any additional claims being reviewed, promoting a more transparent auditing process.
Overall, these changes are expected to significantly impact the pharmacy industry, healthcare providers, and pharmaceutical manufacturers in North Carolina, ultimately enhancing consumer choice and fairness in drug pricing and reimbursement practices.
Committee Assignments: House Committee on Judiciary • House Committee on Calendar and Rules
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires juvenile courts in qualifying Tennessee counties to use and directly supervise an approved detention facility, or arrange with a licensed institution or Department of Children’s Services to provide detention or temporary care.
Committee Assignments: Joint Committee on Health Coverage, Insurance and Financial Services
Summary
AI Overview
The legislative document introduces significant changes to the responsibilities of pharmaceutical manufacturers, health insurance carriers, and pharmacy benefits managers concerning prescription drug benefits. These changes are designed to enhance the financial experience of patients by ensuring they receive direct compensation from pharmaceutical manufacturers at the point of sale, thereby reducing their out-of-pocket costs for medications.
If the compensation is not provided directly to the covered persons, it must be retained by the carriers and used to offset premiums in future plan years. This approach aims to create a more transparent and beneficial system for patients regarding the financial aspects of their prescription drugs.
Additionally, the legislation requires carriers and pharmacy benefits managers to submit annual compliance reports to the superintendent of insurance, ensuring adherence to the new regulations. The information shared with the superintendent is considered confidential, safeguarding the privacy of the involved parties.
Overall, the changes are intended to ensure that patients directly benefit from rebates and compensation associated with their prescription medications, promoting a more equitable healthcare system.
Committee Assignments: House Rules Committee • House Health Care Availability & Accessibility Committee • House Pharmacy Benefit Manager Subcommittee
Summary
AI Overview
The document outlines significant amendments to regulations affecting pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) and their operations within the healthcare sector. Key provisions include prohibitions on spread pricing, steering covered individuals, and the unreasonable designation of specialty drugs, all aimed at improving access to medications. PBMs are required to remit 100% of rebates and fees to health benefit plan sponsors, consumers, or employers, and must ensure that reimbursements to pharmacies meet or exceed the national average drug acquisition cost plus a professional dispensing fee.
Additionally, the regulations mandate that PBMs provide network providers with clear contact information for processing appeals and must disclose the reasons for any denial or approval of appeals. Plan sponsors are granted the right to conduct annual audits of PBMs to ensure compliance with contract terms, including full disclosure of rebate amounts from pharmaceutical manufacturers. Furthermore, contracts with 340B entities cannot impose less favorable terms compared to non-340B entities, ensuring equitable access to prescription drugs.
The document also emphasizes the importance of transparency in reporting, requiring PBMs to submit annual reports detailing drug coverage, spending, and compensation to brokers or consultants. These reports must be written in plain language and filed with the appropriate department, contributing to enhanced accountability within the pharmacy benefit management sector.
Overall, these amendments aim to foster transparency and fairness in the pricing and reimbursement processes related to prescription drugs, significantly impacting the healthcare industry, particularly pharmacies, health insurance providers, and PBMs. The changes are designed to improve access to medications for covered individuals while ensuring that operational standards are met across various sectors.
Committee Assignments: House Committee on Insurance
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires Georgia’s state employees’ health insurance “board” to publish annually, beginning July 1, 2026, a public website report quantifying prescription drug rebates and other price concessions reducing premiums.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • North Carolina • Bill
Committee Assignments: House Committee on Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House
Summary
AI Overview
The document outlines a legislative act designed to promote transparency in prescription drug pricing in North Carolina. It affects various stakeholders, including pharmaceutical manufacturers, health insurance companies, pharmacy benefits managers, health care service plan providers, and state agencies involved in drug purchasing or prescribing.
Key provisions require manufacturers to notify interested parties of significant price increases and new products, along with disclosing financial information related to these changes. This initiative aims to provide consumers and businesses with clearer insights into drug pricing dynamics.
The act is set to take effect on October 1, 2025, at which point manufacturers will be obligated to begin their notifications. Additionally, the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services will develop a plan for data collection on prescription drug pricing, with findings to be reported to the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Health and Human Services by February 1, 2026.
An online portal will be established to ensure public access to the required notifications and reports, further enhancing transparency in the prescription drug market. Overall, the act seeks to improve the understanding of drug pricing, potentially influencing costs for consumers and the operations of involved businesses.
Committee Assignments: Senate State and Local Government Committee
Summary
AI Overview
The document outlines amendments to Minnesota Statutes 2024 concerning the procurement and management of pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) and the associated technology platform. A key change mandates the commissioner of management and budget to procure a contract for PBM services, utilizing a reverse auction process for selection, which will also apply to future procurements.
Additionally, the amendments require a competitive bidding process for selecting a technology platform vendor to be completed at least three months prior to the reverse auction. This platform must facilitate automated claims adjudication, assess PBM qualifications, and ensure robust data security.
Data protection measures are emphasized, with agreements with technology vendors needing to include privacy protections that prevent unauthorized access, prohibit data sales, and restrict data dissemination.
The changes are expected to significantly impact the healthcare and pharmaceutical industries, particularly those involved in pharmacy benefit management and related technology services. Furthermore, the commissioner has the authority to structure contracts that may include fees per prescription paid by PBMs to the technology platform vendor, potentially affecting the cost structure of prescription drug management.
Overall, these amendments aim to improve the efficiency, transparency, and security of pharmacy benefit management in Minnesota.
Committee Assignments: Senate Health and Human Services Committee • Senate Commerce and Consumer Protection Committee
Summary
AI Overview
The new legislation requires pharmacy benefit managers and health carriers to utilize compensation received from drug manufacturers to lower out-of-pocket costs for covered persons at the point of sale. This obligation is in effect unless the cost-sharing amount for a drug is already less than the reduced price after applying the compensation. In such instances, the retained compensation must be allocated to offset future premiums or costs for the covered persons.
The legislation significantly impacts the pharmacy benefit management and health insurance industries, as it mandates a shift in how financial benefits, including rebates and discounts, are handled.
Pharmacy benefit managers and health carriers must file a compliance report with the commissioner starting March 1, 2026, and continue to do so annually.
An exception is made for covered persons whose cost-sharing obligation is $25 or less for generic drugs and $55 or less for brand name drugs.
The effective date for these provisions is January 1, 2026.
This bill prohibits health plan issuers that cover pharmacy services from requiring, as a participation condition, accreditation or certification standards inconsistent with the Ohio Board of Pharmacy.
Committee Assignments: House Committee on State Government Finance and Policy
Summary
AI Overview
The document outlines amendments to Minnesota Statutes 2024 concerning the procurement and management of pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) and the associated technology platform. The contract for pharmacy benefit management services is set to take effect on January 1, 2023, with future procurements potentially allowing for the separation or integration of services into overall medical benefits, which would exempt them from certain provisions.
A key aspect of the amendments is the requirement for the commissioner of management and budget to conduct a reverse auction for selecting PBMs. This process aims to enhance transparency and cost-effectiveness by ensuring competitive bidding for contracts. Additionally, a technology platform must be procured to support this reverse auction, featuring capabilities for evaluating PBM qualifications, automating claim adjudication, and collecting reimbursement data, while adhering to specific performance and security standards.
Data protection is emphasized, with agreements with technology platform vendors mandated to include privacy protections that prevent unauthorized access, the sale of data, and dissemination without legal authorization. The changes primarily impact the healthcare and pharmaceutical industries, particularly those involved in pharmacy benefit management and healthcare data management technology services.
Furthermore, the commissioner is required to perform annual market checks on PBM services to assess pricing metrics and their effects on prescription drug costs and state savings. Overall, these amendments aim to improve the efficiency, transparency, and security of pharmacy benefit management in Minnesota, with a strong focus on data privacy and competitive pricing.
Committee Assignments: Senate Committee on Labor and Commerce
Summary
AI Overview
The legislation introduces amendments to municipal and state group health insurance plans, including self-insured plans and pharmacy benefits management. It mandates compliance with specific regulations for municipalities offering group health care insurance, impacting health insurance providers, pharmacy benefits managers, and governmental units. Municipalities will need to adapt their health insurance offerings to meet these new requirements, which may involve administrative costs and changes in insurance premiums.
Eligible individuals receiving benefits under certain Alaska statutes will have access to auditory, visual, dental, and long-term care insurance for themselves and their dependents, with the cost of premiums borne by the individuals. Group health insurance policies for employees of participating governmental units will also be subject to the same regulatory framework.
The Department of Administration is authorized to provide self-insurance for certain benefits and must procure necessary excess loss insurance for state employees and individuals receiving benefits under the specified statutes. The changes outlined in the legislation will take effect on January 1, 2026.
Overall, the amendments aim to standardize and regulate health care insurance plans for municipal employees and individuals receiving benefits, impacting various stakeholders in the health insurance and public administration sectors. The specific monetary impacts of these changes are not detailed in the text.
The document outlines significant amendments to the Illinois Insurance Code that will affect health plans and pharmacy benefit managers in the state. These changes are designed to enhance transparency in prescription pricing and improve access to essential healthcare information for patients and providers.
Health plans and pharmacy benefit managers will be required to provide specific data upon request from covered individuals, their healthcare providers, or authorized third parties. This data includes patient-specific eligibility information, prescription cost and benefit details, information on lower-cost treatment alternatives, and utilization management requirements.
To ensure accessibility, the required data must be current within one business day of any change and provided in real-time. It should be easily accessible, particularly through electronic health records systems, and requests for data must comply with established industry standards.
Additionally, health plans and pharmacy benefit managers are prohibited from obstructing prescribers from sharing information about alternative treatment options, including cash prices and lower-cost alternatives. These amendments aim to empower patients and providers with the necessary information to make informed healthcare decisions.
Committee Assignments: House Rules Committee • House Health Care Availability & Accessibility Committee
Summary
AI Overview
The document outlines significant regulatory changes affecting the pharmacy benefit management industry, health insurers, and pharmacies in Illinois, particularly regarding the pricing and reimbursement of prescription drugs. A key provision mandates that cost-sharing for covered individuals will be calculated at the point of sale based on a price reduced by at least 80% of all rebates received, enhancing transparency in drug pricing.
Health insurers and their agents are prohibited from disclosing the actual amounts of rebates received, ensuring confidentiality in this area. Additionally, pharmacists are granted the authority to substitute biological products with either the reference product or an FDA-approved biosimilar, broadening the options available to patients.
The regulations also emphasize the need for pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) to regularly update pricing information and allow for audits by plan sponsors to ensure compliance with rebate disclosures. Pharmacies are given the right to appeal reimbursement amounts that fall below what was paid to suppliers, promoting fairness in reimbursement practices.
Furthermore, protections are established for 340B entities, preventing discrimination in reimbursement methodologies and ensuring that cost-sharing calculations reflect received rebates. These changes are expected to influence the operations of health insurers, the pricing strategies of pharmaceutical companies, and the practices of pharmacists, particularly in relation to vulnerable populations served by 340B entities.
Overall, the regulations aim to enhance accountability, transparency, and fairness in the pharmaceutical and health insurance industries, ultimately benefiting patients and healthcare providers alike.
Committee Assignments: House Committee on Health Finance and Policy
Summary
AI Overview
The new legislation requires pharmacy benefit managers and health carriers to use compensation received from drug manufacturers to lower out-of-pocket costs for prescription drugs at the point of sale for covered individuals. This obligation applies unless the individual's cost-sharing is already less than the reduced price after applying the compensation.
Any compensation that is not utilized to reduce immediate costs must be allocated to offset future premiums or expenses for covered individuals. The legislation aims to enhance affordability and transparency in prescription drug pricing.
Pharmacy benefit management and health insurance industries will be significantly impacted by these requirements. Compliance reports must be submitted to the commissioner starting in 2026, ensuring ongoing accountability in the application of these provisions.
Committee Assignments: Senate Committee on Commerce and Labor
Summary
AI Overview
The bill amends Tennessee Code Annotated, Section 56-7-3103(a)(1) by changing the required duration in the referenced insurance/prescription pharmacy benefit from “two (2) weeks” to “three (3) weeks.”
Committee Assignments: House Committee on Health Finance and Policy
Summary
AI Overview
The document outlines a legislative act aimed at improving access to pharmaceutical services in rural and underserved areas of Minnesota. It mandates the establishment of a directed pharmacy dispensing payment of $4.50 per filled prescription for eligible outpatient retail pharmacies.
To qualify for this payment, pharmacies must be licensed and meet specific criteria related to their location and ownership. The initiative is designed to support pharmacies that serve medically underserved populations or are located in medically underserved areas.
Managed care and county-based purchasing plans, along with pharmacy benefit managers, are required to pay the directed pharmacy dispensing payment to eligible pharmacies. The funding for this initiative will be adjusted based on available state and federal resources.
The changes are set to take effect on July 1, 2025, or upon federal approval, whichever occurs later. Appropriations from the general fund for fiscal years 2026 and 2027 are allocated to support these payments.
The document outlines significant regulatory changes affecting pharmacy benefits managers (PBMs), pharmacies, and prescription drugs in Iowa. Key provisions include a prohibition on discrimination by PBMs against pharmacies or pharmacists, ensuring that all parties can participate fairly without additional barriers. Furthermore, PBMs are restricted from limiting consumer choice regarding pharmacies and cannot impose financial penalties that would influence a patient's selection of pharmacy.
Reimbursement standards are established, requiring PBMs to reimburse pharmacies at least the national average drug acquisition cost or the Iowa average acquisition cost, along with a professional dispensing fee. Additionally, PBMs are prohibited from imposing different cost-sharing or fees based on the pharmacy used, ensuring that cost-sharing reflects all rebates received.
The regulations also mandate a structured appeals process for pharmacies to contest reimbursement rates, enhancing transparency and fairness in negotiations. All contracts related to prescription drug benefits executed or renewed after a specified date must adopt a pass-through pricing model, promoting clearer pricing practices.
These changes are expected to significantly impact the pharmacy and healthcare industries, particularly in how pharmacies negotiate with PBMs and how consumers access prescription medications. The overall aim is to improve access to prescription drugs while ensuring fair reimbursement practices and enhancing transparency in the pharmacy benefits system.
Committee Assignments: Senate Health and Human Services Committee
Summary
AI Overview
The document outlines a legislative act aimed at improving access to pharmaceutical services in rural and underserved areas of Minnesota. It mandates the establishment of a directed pharmacy dispensing payment of $4.50 per filled prescription for eligible outpatient retail pharmacies.
To qualify for this payment, pharmacies must be licensed and located in medically underserved areas or primarily serve medically underserved populations. They are required to submit a form to the commissioner of human services to attest to their eligibility.
Managed care and county-based purchasing plans, along with pharmacy benefit managers, are obligated to pay the directed pharmacy dispensing payment to eligible pharmacies. The initiative is supported by appropriations from the general fund for fiscal years 2026 and 2027.
The changes are set to take effect on July 1, 2025, or upon federal approval, whichever is later.
Committee Assignments: Senate Commerce and Consumer Protection Committee
Summary
AI Overview
The new legislation requires health carriers to ensure that enrollees receive any rebates and discounts related to prescription drugs at the point of sale. Health carriers must calculate an enrollee's cost-sharing based on the price reduced by the total amount of rebates received or expected, which may lead to lower out-of-pocket costs for consumers.
This legislation primarily impacts health insurance providers and pharmacy benefit managers, necessitating adjustments in their pricing and rebate management practices to comply with the new requirements.
Additionally, the bill emphasizes the confidentiality of rebate information, classifying it as a trade secret and prohibiting its disclosure in various forms. Health carriers are also mandated to extend these confidentiality protections to any vendors or third parties involved in health care or administrative services.
While specific monetary impacts are not detailed, the requirement for rebates to be passed on to enrollees could significantly benefit consumers. The effective date for these changes has not been specified.
Committee Assignments: Senate Committee on Commerce
Summary
AI Overview
The proposed changes to regulations concerning pharmacy benefits managers (PBMs), pharmacies, and prescription drugs in Iowa aim to enhance access to pharmacy services and reduce costs for consumers. One significant change is the prohibition of requiring individuals to purchase pharmacy services exclusively through mail order pharmacies, except for specialty drugs. This measure is designed to improve access to medications.
Additionally, PBMs are now required to pass 100% of all rebates received to health carriers or employer plan sponsors, which is intended to lower premiums for consumers. Furthermore, pharmacies with five or fewer locations will receive a professional dispensing fee of $3 per prescription, as will pharmacies with six or more locations located in a pharmacy desert.
Another key change is the prohibition of spread pricing in contracts related to prescription drug benefits. This practice, where PBMs charge third-party payors more for drugs than what they reimburse pharmacies, will be banned in contracts executed, amended, adjusted, or renewed on or after July 1, 2025.
These regulatory changes are expected to promote fairer pricing practices within the pharmacy and healthcare industries, ultimately benefiting consumers by improving access to medications and reducing costs.
The document outlines amendments to the Illinois Insurance Code that will impact cost sharing for prescription drugs in health insurance policies, effective January 1, 2026. Both group and individual accident and health insurance policies covering prescription drugs must calculate a covered individual's defined cost sharing at the point of sale based on a price reduced by at least 100% of all rebates received for the prescription drug.
Insurers are required to apply any rebate amounts that exceed the defined cost sharing to reduce health plan premiums. Additionally, they are permitted to decrease a covered individual's defined cost sharing by more than the stated amount at the point of sale.
These changes will primarily affect health insurance providers and pharmaceutical companies, as they may lead to significant alterations in pricing structures and rebate management. While specific monetary impacts are not detailed, the requirement for rebates to be applied at the point of sale could result in lower out-of-pocket costs for consumers.
Committee Assignments: House Committee on Insurance
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill establishes that a pharmacy benefits manager shall owe specified duties of care, good faith, and transparency to any insured, health plan, or provider receiving PBM services, enforced through a private civil action.
Committee Assignments: Senate Committee on Business and Insurance
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires pharmacy benefits managers to maintain NCPDP-compliant electronic claim inquiry systems and provide timely data to pharmacies and the Attorney General under network-access oversight.
Committee Assignments: Senate Committee on Health and Human Services
Summary
AI Overview
The proposed changes to regulations governing pharmacy benefits managers (PBMs), pharmacies, and prescription drugs in Iowa aim to enhance transparency and fairness in the pharmacy benefit management system. Key provisions include prohibiting PBMs from discriminating against pharmacies or pharmacists regarding participation and reimbursement, as long as they operate within their licensed scope and comply with applicable laws.
The regulations ensure that consumers have the freedom to choose their pharmacy without facing financial penalties or higher copayments based on their selection. Additionally, PBMs are required to reimburse pharmacies at least the national average drug acquisition cost or the Iowa average acquisition cost for prescription drugs, along with a professional dispensing fee as outlined in the Iowa Medicaid enterprise provider fee schedule.
To further protect pharmacies, the bill mandates a structured appeals process for contesting reimbursement rates, requiring PBMs to respond to appeals within seven business days. It also prohibits PBMs from unreasonably designating drugs as specialty drugs, requiring patients to use mail order pharmacies exclusively, or imposing different cost-sharing based on pharmacy choice.
Contracts related to prescription drug benefits must utilize a pass-through pricing model, excluding spread pricing unless the difference is fully passed through. These regulations are set to take effect for PBMs managing prescription drug benefits in Iowa starting July 1, 2025, with specific contract requirements applicable to benefits beginning January 1, 2026.
Overall, these changes are designed to protect consumer choice, ensure fair reimbursement practices, and promote equitable access to pharmacy services, significantly impacting the healthcare and pharmaceutical industries.
The bill amends Tennessee law governing insurance benefits for pharmacy by changing a time period requirement. Specifically, it amends Tennessee Code Annotated § 56-7-3103(a)(1) to substitute “three (3) weeks” for the prior “two (2) weeks.” The amendment shortens or extends (depending on prior context) the applicable pharmacy-related insurance benefit duration referenced in that subsection.
The bill provides an effective date of January 1, 2026, citing the public welfare as the basis for the effective date.
Committee Assignments: Senate Committee on Health and Human Services
Summary
AI Overview
The document outlines a legislative proposal aimed at enhancing the procurement process for pharmacy benefits management (PBM) services in Iowa through the implementation of reverse auctions for self-funded public sector health plans. This initiative is expected to primarily impact the pharmacy benefits management industry, including PBMs, technology vendors, and public sector health plans, while also potentially influencing self-funded private sector health plans in the future.
A key feature of the proposal is the introduction of a "no-pay option," which requires the winning PBM to cover the costs associated with the technology platform used for the auctions through a per-prescription fee. This fee structure is designed to prevent additional costs to the state related to the reverse auction process and ongoing claim validations, thereby promoting cost savings for the state and participating health plans.
The proposal also includes the establishment of an automated pharmacy claims adjudication engine by the Department of Administrative Services (DAS) to conduct real-time reviews of PBM drug claims, ensuring compliance with service contracts. This system aims to maintain fiscal discipline by capping state payments for PBM services to the terms specified in the contracts.
Furthermore, the legislation allows for a joint purchasing pool that self-funded private sector health plans with significant participation by Iowa employees can join after the first reverse auction. This collaborative approach is intended to enhance competition and transparency in the procurement of PBM services while allowing participating plans to retain full autonomy.
Lastly, the DAS retains the authority to vacate the outcome of a PBM reverse auction if the lowest bid does not align with the projected cost trends of the current PBM contract, ensuring that the procurement process remains effective and beneficial for the state and its employees.
Committee Assignments: Senate Committee on Health and Human Services
Summary
AI Overview
The document outlines a legislative proposal aimed at enhancing transparency and affordability in health care services in Iowa. Key provisions require health care providers to establish and disclose discounted cash prices for specific services, which must be accessible to both insured and uninsured individuals. Providers are mandated to update these prices within ten days of any changes and review them annually, ensuring that individuals are informed of their right to pay via cash price prior to receiving services.
Health benefit plans are required to disclose the average allowed amount for each covered health care service. If a covered person pays a discounted cash price below this average, they will receive credit toward their in-network cost-sharing as if the service was provided by an in-network provider. Additionally, if a covered person pays a cash price for a generic drug that is lower than the average allowed amount for a name-brand drug, the health benefit plan must apply that payment toward the covered person's cost-sharing.
The proposal also introduces a savings incentive program that rewards individuals for using discounted cash prices below the average allowed amount, with savings split equally between the individual and their health benefit plan. Furthermore, individuals will have access to a program analyzing the cost-effectiveness of a savings incentive and deductible credit for state employees and retirees, with a report due to the General Assembly by September 1, 2026.
To improve pricing transparency, health carriers must provide out-of-pocket pricing for drugs on their formulary to pharmacists at the time of prescription filling. Providers are also required to give individuals an itemized list of services provided, confirming that no claim will be made against the individual's health carrier if they paid out-of-pocket.
Lastly, if a health carrier denies a claim, they must notify the commissioner and provide evidence to support the denial, while individuals retain the right to appeal such denials. Overall, these changes aim to empower consumers with information and incentives to make cost-effective health care decisions.
Committee Assignments: Senate Committee on Business and Insurance
Summary
AI Overview
The document outlines significant regulatory changes affecting Pharmacy Benefits Managers (PBMs) and their interactions with pharmacies and health insurers in Oklahoma. The new regulations aim to enhance transparency and compliance within the pharmacy benefits management sector, focusing on the financial dynamics between PBMs, health plans, and pharmacies. Key provisions include restrictions on fees that PBMs can impose on pharmacies and requirements for PBMs to disclose detailed information about prescription drug discounts and rebates.
Additionally, the regulations mandate that health insurers calculate enrollees' cost sharing for prescription drugs at the point of sale, ensuring that it reflects a substantial portion of the rebates received. The establishment of Pharmacy and Therapeutics (P&T) committees is also emphasized, with these committees responsible for evaluating drugs and managing formularies in a transparent manner.
The changes are expected to provide greater protection for pharmacies, particularly independent ones, by ensuring equitable reimbursement practices and reducing the potential for unfair treatment by PBMs. Overall, these regulations are poised to significantly impact the pharmacy and healthcare industries, promoting a more transparent and equitable environment for all stakeholders involved.
Committee Assignments: Senate Commerce and Consumer Protection Committee
Summary
AI Overview
The legislation requires health plan companies in Minnesota that offer prescription coverage to pay a minimum dispensing fee for pharmacy services when dispensing prescribed medications. This fee must be at least equal to the amount specified in a particular section of the law.
However, the new requirements do not extend to managed care plans or county-based purchasing plans that serve enrollees in public health care programs.
The specific financial implications of the dispensing fee are not outlined in the text, and no effective date for the changes has been provided.
The primary industries affected by this legislation include health insurance providers and pharmacies.
Committee Assignments: House Committee on Health Care
Summary
AI Overview
The proposed bill aims to prohibit pharmacy benefit managers from owning or operating pharmacies in Vermont. This change is anticipated to have significant implications for the pharmacy and healthcare industries within the state.
By restricting the ownership of pharmacies by pharmacy benefit managers, the bill seeks to alter the current business dynamics between these entities and local pharmacies.
While the specific financial impacts of this legislation are not detailed, the overall effect on the healthcare landscape in Vermont could be substantial.
No timeline for the implementation of these changes has been provided.
The document outlines significant changes to pharmacy benefits managers (PBMs), pharmacies, and prescription drug benefits in Iowa. One key provision mandates that any amount paid for a prescription drug must be applied to the health benefit plan's deductible for covered persons.
Additionally, covered persons are granted the right to fill prescriptions at any pharmacy within the state, as long as the pharmacy agrees to the same terms outlined in the covered person’s health benefit plan. PBMs are also prohibited from imposing different cost-sharing or additional fees based on the choice of pharmacy used by the covered person.
Furthermore, PBMs cannot require covered persons to obtain pharmacy services exclusively through a mail order pharmacy provider. These changes are set to impact how prescription drug benefits are managed and accessed in Iowa, potentially influencing cost structures and service delivery within the pharmacy and health insurance industries. Specific monetary impacts of these changes are not detailed in the document.
bill
Legislation • 🇺🇸 United States • North Carolina • Bill
Committee Assignments: House Committee on Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House
Summary
AI Overview
The document presents a legislative proposal designed to tackle the escalating healthcare costs in North Carolina, which place a significant burden on individuals, families, employers, and taxpayers. A primary focus of the bill is its impact on small businesses, as government-mandated health insurance requirements are expected to lead to higher premiums, thereby straining these employers financially.
To address the financial implications, the legislation stipulates that any new health benefit mandates must be balanced by the repeal of an equal number of existing mandates. Furthermore, new mandates must be accompanied by recurring funding appropriations to cover their costs, which could result in increased financial obligations for the state and potentially higher expenses for employers and taxpayers.
The overarching goal of the bill is to enhance transparency regarding the costs associated with health insurance mandates while aiming to alleviate some of the financial pressures faced by North Carolina's employers and taxpayers.
This bill requires insurers and pharmacy benefits managers to calculate each prescription drug’s defined cost sharing at point of sale using a price reduced by an amount equal to at least 85% of related rebates.
Committee Assignments: Senate Committee on Insurance and Labor
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill establishes that a pharmacy benefits manager owes a statutory duty of care to insureds, health plans, and providers, requiring Commissioner regulations on class-based transparency and conflicts priority.
Committee Assignments: House Committee on Health Care
Summary
AI Overview
The document proposes comprehensive changes to health insurance regulations in Vermont, aiming to enhance clarity, consistency, and consumer protections. Key provisions include the repeal and reorganization of existing statutes, addressing various aspects of health insurance policies such as exemptions from legal processes, age limits, and termination of coverage. Significant consumer protections are introduced, including the prohibition of preexisting condition exclusions, annual and lifetime limits on essential health benefits, and the requirement for no cost-sharing for certain preventive services.
The regulations emphasize transparency in rate setting, mandating health insurers to file plain language summaries of proposed rate increases, which will be overseen by the Green Mountain Care Board to ensure community input and justification for rate changes. Additionally, guidelines for group health insurance policies are established, ensuring that they meet specific eligibility criteria and coverage requirements, while promoting inclusivity by mandating equal benefits for part-time employees.
Further provisions focus on maintaining coverage during transitions, requiring employers to notify employees of their rights to continue major medical and dental insurance benefits following qualifying events. Insurers must also provide clear communication regarding premium payments and coverage termination, and they are required to cover essential services, including mental health treatment and gender-affirming care.
The document also addresses specific healthcare needs, mandating coverage for sexual assault examinations, cancer screenings, and telemedicine services. Health insurance plans must cover necessary medications, limit out-of-pocket costs for insulin, and ensure equitable access to vision care by providing equal reimbursement for services rendered by optometrists and ophthalmologists.
Overall, these proposed updates aim to improve access to essential health services, promote stability in health insurance markets, and enhance consumer protections for individuals and families in Vermont, reflecting a commitment to addressing diverse healthcare needs while ensuring comprehensive and equitable coverage.
Committee Assignments: House Committee on Insurance
Summary
AI Overview
AT A GLANCE
This bill requires health insurers to reduce enrollee prescription drug cost sharing by passing through at least 80% of third-party rebates through point-of-sale pricing calculations for covered drugs.
Committee Assignments: House Committee on Health Care
Summary
AI Overview
The proposed legislation in Vermont aims to enhance oversight of health care entity transactions and clinical decision-making. It requires health care entities to notify the Green Mountain Care Board and the Attorney General before engaging in specific transactions, allowing for a review process that can result in approval, conditional approval, or disapproval. The legislation specifically addresses corporate practices in medicine, prohibiting corporations from practicing medicine or interfering with health care providers' professional judgment.
Key impacted industries include health care providers, facilities, private equity groups, and management services organizations. The legislation emphasizes the importance of transparency and public involvement in health care transactions while ensuring the protection of sensitive information. It mandates that the Green Mountain Care Board post information about material change transactions publicly and conduct preliminary and comprehensive reviews based on specific criteria.
The regulations also focus on ownership and management practices within medical practices, ensuring that licensee owners demonstrate meaningful ownership and prohibiting dual ownership with management services organizations. Noncompetition agreements are declared void, and health care entities must maintain control over their clinical operations to protect patient care quality.
Additionally, the legislation requires health care entities to report ownership and control information to the Green Mountain Care Board, promoting transparency in the sector. The Board is tasked with publishing a report every two years detailing ownership trends and changes within health care entities, further enhancing accountability in the industry.
Overall, the legislation seeks to protect public interest in health care transactions, ensuring equitable access to services while maintaining oversight of financial implications and corporate practices in the health care sector.
Committee Assignments: Senate Health and Human Services Committee
Summary
AI Overview
The document outlines amendments to Minnesota Statutes concerning human services, with a particular focus on prescription drug coverage. Key changes include the introduction of dispensing fee requirements for health plan companies and county-based purchasing plans that offer prescription drug coverage under the medical assistance program.
The amendments empower the commissioner to adjust prescription drug coverage in prepaid managed care contracts to achieve state savings through enhanced collection of prescription drug rebates. Managed care plans are encouraged to implement strategies for managing drug costs, including the use of preferred drug lists and prior authorization.
A notable financial impact of these amendments is the requirement for prepaid health plans and county-based purchasing plans to pay a dispensing fee for pharmacy services that meets or exceeds the fee specified in existing statutes.
These changes are scheduled to take effect on January 1, 2026, or upon federal approval, whichever occurs later. The commissioner of human services will notify the revisor of statutes once federal approval is secured.