The document outlines a series of legislative changes in California that impact public safety, corrections, education, and mental health services. Key amendments include adjustments to the Board of State and Community Corrections' quorum requirements, the renaming of the Prison Industry Authority, and clarifications regarding juvenile court jurisdiction. Additionally, counties are restricted from initiating driver's license suspensions for revenue collection, which may influence local finances.

In education, local agencies are required to adopt policies addressing pupil behavioral health and ensure that a significant percentage of staff receive training in this area. Funding will support these initiatives, emphasizing evidence-based practices for recognizing and addressing mental health issues among students. Regulations for nonpublic, nonsectarian schools have been established, focusing on compliance, operational standards, and the use of seclusion and restraints in psychiatric facilities to protect patient rights.

Changes to firearm possession regulations mandate that individuals under protective orders relinquish firearms, while law enforcement agencies must develop policies on the use of force, including de-escalation techniques. The document also highlights the need for improved training and support for foster parents and caregivers, alongside initiatives to expand behavioral health resources for children and youth, and mandates workplace violence prevention plans in healthcare settings.

Significant amendments to the Penal Code address the distribution and possession of obscene materials involving minors, establishing severe penalties and clarifying enforcement procedures. The document also details the evaluation and commitment processes for defendants deemed mentally incompetent to stand trial, emphasizing timely evaluations and treatment options. Enhanced training for peace officers on crisis intervention and interactions with individuals experiencing mental health issues is also mandated.

Lastly, the document introduces changes to the Public Resources Code, Public Utilities Code, and Unemployment Insurance Code, affecting various industries. It emphasizes the rights of children in foster care, ensuring access to healthcare, education, and legal representation, while establishing a mobile response system for children in crisis. Overall, these legislative changes reflect a commitment to improving public safety, accountability, and support for vulnerable populations, particularly children in foster care and those involved in the juvenile justice system.

FULL SUMMARY

The bill requires “recovery-friendly” and person-centered terminology changes across Connecticut’s mental health and addiction statutes, replacing multiple terms related to addiction treatment and services. It also makes several substantive program and governance updates for the Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services (DMHAS), including changes to advisory-board membership/operation, state behavioral health planning structures, post-mass-shooting mental health staffing coordination, and updates to behavioral-health service and financing provisions (including Medicaid-related administration and insurance-covered service terminology).

For terminology, the bill generally substitutes “substance use” for “substance abuse,” “opioid use disorder” for “opiate/opioid addiction,” and “withdrawal management” for “detoxification,” among other related changes (including “alcohol and drug counselor” for prior counselor terminology). It also updates specific operative provisions to reflect these terms in school curricula (substance use prevention and related health/safety instruction), teacher and pupil-personnel training, child/family and early childhood home-visitation recommendations, homeless youth services components (including counseling referrals), and multiple DMHAS and Department of Public Health/Consumer Protection licensing or program provisions.

Operational and governance changes include: (1) coordination after mass shootings—DESPP must coordinate with DMHAS (in addition to DPH) when deploying grief counselors and other mental health professionals (effective upon passage); (2) DMHAS-advisory board and related facility oversight updates—revises advisory board membership requirements and appointment mechanics for DMHAS-operated facilities and exempts the Connecticut Valley Hospital advisory council and Whiting Forensic Hospital oversight board from the updated structure; (3) behavioral health planning structure changes—DMHAS statutory “subregional planning/catchment area council” references are repealed/cleaned up, aligning responsibilities with Regional Behavioral Health Action Organizations; and (4) statewide behavioral health substance use/withdrawal and opioid treatment-related program updates (including changes to emergency/triage and withdrawal management terminology and some related authorization language).

The bill also includes policy and program changes affecting how services are delivered and covered. It expands or clarifies requirements for public access to substance-use treatment availability via an electronic information portal, updates education/treatment coordination through case- and eligibility-related requirements, and modifies DMHAS-related Medicaid optional rehabilitation services administration and DMHAS behavioral health recovery program operations for eligible Medicaid recipients. Across insurance law, it updates the scope and terminology for covered substance use disorder and withdrawal management services and ensures policies cannot deny covered substance use disorder services solely due to services being provided under a court order. Statutory effective dates are primarily October 1, 2026 for the re-referenced/rewritten provisions, with the mass-shooting coordination and certain DMHAS facility advisory board provisions taking effect upon passage. An OFA fiscal note indicates no fiscal impact.

The document establishes a new Part XVII of chapter 468, Florida Statutes, titled "Music Therapy," which creates licensure requirements, defines practice standards, and sets disciplinary grounds for music therapists. It introduces the formation of the Music Therapy Advisory Committee within the Department of Health, detailing its composition, appointment process, duties, and meeting requirements, with initial appointments including non-licensed practitioners with at least three years of experience. The committee is responsible for overseeing licensure, practice standards, and rulemaking related to music therapy.

The bill sets forth practice standards for licensed professional music therapists, including requirements to review client diagnoses, collaborate with healthcare providers, and coordinate with audiologists or speech-language pathologists when addressing communication disorders. It also prohibits unlicensed individuals from practicing music therapy and mandates collaboration with the client's treatment team during service provision, effective from January 1, 2027.

Additionally, the bill creates Section 468.8506, establishing grounds for disciplinary action against licensed music therapists. These grounds include failure to maintain licensure, criminal convictions, unprofessional conduct such as negligence or abuse, violations of the part, and disciplinary actions in other jurisdictions. The Department of Health is authorized to investigate misconduct and impose sanctions such as license suspension, revocation, probation, reprimand, or fines. The department is also required to adopt implementing rules by October 1, 2026, with the act taking effect on July 1, 2026.

FULL SUMMARY

The bill establishes two new statutory mechanisms for Florida education scholarship funding and related stabilization: a categorical fund and payment/release regime for the Family Empowerment Scholarship Program (creating s. 1011.687, F.S.), and an “educational enrollment stabilization program” to provide supplemental state funding when full-time equivalent enrollment changes during the year (creating s. 1011.689, F.S.). It also contains a broad set of operational requirements governing scholarship program administration, including eligibility verification, scholarship payment account rules, testing obligations, background screening for providers, private school participation obligations, departmental and district duties, and accountability/reporting processes.

In addition to creating these new sections, the bill changes existing Florida statutes substantially. It renames the Hope Scholarship Program as the “Hope Program” (amending s. 1002.40) and makes extensive revisions to scholarship oversight and program rules in s. 1002.421 (accountability/oversight for school choice scholarship programs) and s. 1002.394 (Family Empowerment Scholarship Program). It also updates other related statutes affecting audits (e.g., Auditor General audit frequency/authority in s. 1010.305 and related provisions), fund computations (s. 1011.61 and s. 1011.62, including references to the new stabilization program and scholarship FTE treatment), and conforms cross-references in several areas (including ss. 212.099, 402.22, 1002.45, 1003.485, 1010.20, and 1010.305). The bill directs the Department of Education to provide specified implementation recommendations for scholarship programs in a report and specifies contract/procurement requirements for project components.

The bill also sets an effective date of July 1, 2026 and includes an expiration clause for the Department of Education recommendation/report section (expiration July 1, 2027).

The document establishes a comprehensive regulatory framework for music therapy in Florida by creating Part XVII of chapter 468 of the Florida Statutes, titled "Music Therapy." It introduces licensing requirements for music therapists, including specific education, examination, and certification standards, with licenses to be renewed biennially and unlicensed practice prohibited starting January 1, 2027. The framework defines key terms such as "board-certified music therapist" and "practice of music therapy" as necessary for implementing the licensing provisions.

Additionally, the document creates new statutory sections detailing practice standards, restrictions, and grounds for disciplinary actions against licensed music therapists. Violations include failure to maintain certification, providing false information, criminal convictions, unprofessional conduct, and violations by other jurisdictions. Disciplinary sanctions authorized include license suspension, revocation, denial, probation, reprimand, or fines. The Department of Health is tasked with adopting implementing rules by October 1, 2026, and the act is set to take effect on July 1, 2026.

The document establishes a new Gun Violence Prevention Pilot Program in Gainesville by creating section 394.4997 of the Florida Statutes. This program includes legislative findings, development, eligibility criteria, operational requirements, referral processes, reporting obligations, and an expiration date. It authorizes an appropriation of $500,000 from the General Revenue Fund for its implementation, with an effective date of July 1, 2026. The program specifically targets participants aged 10 to 21 who are at moderate or high risk of gun violence, including victims, offenders, or individuals returning from delinquency programs, as well as their family members. Definitions necessary for understanding the program include "IMPACT GNV" and "Gun Violence Prevention Pilot Program."

The document outlines amendments to various licensing acts in Illinois that affect the fields of clinical psychology, social work, marriage and family therapy, music therapy, occupational therapy, and professional counseling. A significant change across these acts is the introduction of provisions allowing applicants to temporarily practice under supervision while their licensure applications are pending, provided they meet specific conditions.

For clinical psychologists and social workers, the amendments specify qualifications for licensure, including educational requirements and the necessity of good moral character. Additionally, the renewal process for licenses has been streamlined, allowing for renewals within 60 days of expiration, and provisions for restoring expired or inactive licenses have been established, particularly for military service members.

In the areas of marriage and family therapy, music therapy, occupational therapy, and professional counseling, similar temporary practice provisions have been introduced, with varying effective dates. These changes are expected to enhance access to mental health services by facilitating a quicker entry into the workforce for licensed professionals.

The amendments emphasize non-discriminatory practices in licensing, ensuring that licenses cannot be denied based on race, religion, creed, national origin, political beliefs, age, sex, sexual orientation, or physical impairment. Overall, these changes aim to streamline the licensing process and improve the availability of mental health services in Illinois.

The document amends the Music Therapy Licensing and Practice Act in Illinois by making a technical change to the short title of the Act. This amendment is part of a broader regulatory framework aimed at enhancing the music therapy industry.

The changes are scheduled to take effect immediately and will impact the music therapy sector, although specific monetary implications are not detailed. Additionally, the section in question is set to be repealed on January 1, 2028.

The document outlines the establishment of the Illinois Psychiatric Residential Treatment Facilities (PRTF) program, which aims to enhance the availability of subacute psychiatric services for individuals under 21. This initiative is expected to significantly impact the mental health services sector by providing a structured framework for delivering intensive psychiatric care in non-acute settings, thereby improving access to necessary treatment for youth.

In addition to the PRTF program, the document details amendments to various acts governing healthcare and long-term care facilities in Illinois. These amendments clarify the definitions and operational requirements for healthcare facilities, including skilled nursing and intermediate care facilities, as well as child care institutions and community living residences. The changes are designed to ensure compliance with updated state regulations and enhance the quality of care provided to vulnerable populations.

The amendments also address the operational landscape for mental health facilities, particularly those certified under the PRTF Act. By establishing clearer standards and definitions, the document aims to improve oversight and accountability within the mental health services industry, which is crucial for safeguarding the well-being of individuals receiving care.

While specific monetary impacts are not detailed, the requirement for compliance with new operational standards may lead to increased costs for affected facilities. The changes are expected to influence the healthcare industry significantly, particularly in the areas of mental health and long-term care, as facilities adapt to meet the new regulatory framework.

Overall, the document emphasizes the importance of regulatory compliance and the need for enhanced oversight in various healthcare and long-term care settings, ultimately aiming to improve service delivery and outcomes for individuals in need of care.

FULL SUMMARY

The bill establishes a new Kentucky licensing framework for professional music therapists by creating a new licensing board and defining the scope of “music therapy” and the “practice of music therapy.” It creates the Kentucky Board of Licensure for Professional Music Therapists (attached to the Department of Professional Licensing for administrative purposes), specifies its 5-member composition and appointment structure, requires the board to promulgate administrative regulations (including licensure, discipline, fee-setting, ethics, continuing education, and license inactivity/return procedures), and establishes a dedicated trust and agency fund in the State Treasury to administer board operations.

The bill requires licensing for practicing music therapy or using protected professional titles/abbreviations. It defines licensing eligibility: applicants must be at least 18, demonstrate professional competence through specified education (bachelor’s degree or higher in music therapy with approved clinical training) and certification evidence (passing board certification or being transitioned into it, including being currently board-certified). It also allows licensure without examination in certain circumstances based on valid regulatory documents from other jurisdictions with substantially equivalent/exceeding requirements (as determined by the board). The bill sets licensing/renewal structure (initial licenses issued for two years; renewal after December 31, 2027 on a biennial basis with application, fees, and proof of continued board certification; a 90-day grace period; automatic suspension if renewal is not timely; restoration and eventual revocation rules; reinstatement after revocation requires reapplication and meeting current standards). It includes a retirement/resume mechanism: a licensee who retires may resume within five years by notifying the board, completing required continuing education, and paying an amount equivalent to elapsed renewal fees, resulting in full restoration.

The bill prohibits unlicensed practice and protected-title use after December 31, 2027, with specific exemptions. Licensed professionals in other regulated fields may use music incidental to their licensed profession if they do not hold themselves out as music therapists. The act also does not apply to activities of interns/trainees supervised by a licensed music therapist within an approved program and designated as an intern/student in training. Further, it clarifies that the act does not interfere with employment/job placement/school counseling and does not authorize music therapists to evaluate, examine, instruct, counsel on, or represent authorization to treat communication disorders (unless speech-language pathology authorization exists), and it similarly restricts representing authorization to treat mental health or substance use disorders (allowing representation as working with clients in those areas in coordination with the client’s primary professional).

The bill creates disciplinary and due-process procedures. The board may refuse, deny, suspend, revoke, impose probationary/supervisory conditions, issue written reprimands/admonishments, or combinations for enumerated grounds including fraud/misrepresentation, unfair/deceptive acts, negligence, mental incompetence adjudications, convictions involving sexual misconduct or dishonesty elements (per KRS 335B; includes no-contest pleas with certified records), unprofessional/unethical conduct, unsafe controlled-substance/alcohol use impairing practice, violations of the act or regulations, noncompliance with board orders/assurances, and willful/negligent divulging of professional confidences. It provides for initiation of proceedings via sworn complaints, reinstatement petitions after revocation (no sooner than two years), and a written admonishment process for non-serious violations with the right to respond or request a hearing. Before specified disciplinary actions or reprimands/admonishments, the board must hold a hearing under KRS Chapter 13B; aggrieved parties may appeal final board orders to circuit court. The bill also imposes care-coordination requirements for service delivery: before providing services, a licensed music therapist must review client or student diagnosis/treatment needs and treatment plans with relevant health care providers or education team; during services, the therapist must collaborate as applicable (including coordination with audiologists/speech-language pathologists for communication disorders and with primary mental health/substance use disorder professionals for those disorders). Finally, the bill creates civil/penal exposure: violations (or aiding violations) are subject to criminal conviction penalties of a fine from $500 to $1,000, and it sets initial board appointment transition rules (initial members are three unlicensed music therapists with at least five years’ practice, with staggered terms of 3 years for 2 members, 2 years for 2 members, and 1 year for 1 member).

FULL SUMMARY

The bill establishes, within the Massachusetts Department of Public Health, a five-member Board of Registration for Music Therapists and creates a licensing framework for “licensed professional music therapists” under Chapter 112.

It sets the board’s composition and appointment terms (Governor-appointed members with specified qualifications), requires the board to elect a chair and secretary and meet at least quarterly, and directs the board to set registration requirements, adopt ethical standards, investigate complaints, evaluate applicant qualifications, and issue licenses to those who pass required examinations. The board is also required to maintain and annually publish a list of licensed music therapists, and it is authorized—after hearing procedures—to revoke, suspend, place on probation, or reprimand licensees for specified misconduct (including fraudulently procuring a license, violations of music-therapy practice laws/rules, professional misconduct, and practicing while impaired), with reapplication allowed after one year from revocation.

The bill adds music-therapy-related provisions to Chapter 112 by (1) expanding the list of professions governed by the Chapter 112 “board of registration” structure to include music therapists and (2) adding a new Section 298. Section 298 defines key terms (including the scope of “music therapy” and what the practice excludes), specifies what the practice includes (e.g., assessment for whether treatment is indicated, development and implementation of individualized treatment plans, evaluation and documentation, planning for discontinuation, collaboration/education, and related clinical reasoning), and clarifies that music therapy does not include screening/diagnosis/assessment of physical, mental, or communication disorders. It also creates licensing operations: eligibility requirements (good moral character; bachelor’s degree or higher in music therapy or equivalent; proof of board certification exam passage or transition; and current board certification), continuing education–based renewals, potential licensure by endorsement under certain conditions, and a provisional license mechanism valid for up to six months.

The bill restricts the use of titles (“music therapist” and similar) and prohibits unlicensed practice under those titles, while preserving activities by other duly licensed/certified professionals when music is incidental to their licensed practice and certain supervised or educational-context activities. It adds practice standards before providing services (e.g., review of diagnoses/treatment plans with relevant care teams; collaboration requirements), including limitations on replacing audiology/speech-language pathology services and restrictions on evaluating/instructing/counseling regarding speech, language, communication, and swallowing disorders unless separately authorized. Finally, it imposes a penalty (fine of $500 to $1,000) for violations of specified provisions, willful false oaths, or willful fraudulent attempts to obtain registration.

FULL SUMMARY

The document establishes requirements for the submission of an annual report on the condition of Massachusetts Veterans Homes; it contains the Executive Office of Veterans Services’ November 2025 annual report covering the Massachusetts Veterans Home at Chelsea and the Massachusetts Veterans Home at Holyoke, as required under Section 12 of Chapter 115A of the Massachusetts General Laws.

It reports operational initiatives implemented since October 2023, including reporting of both Homes to the EOVS Secretary after enactment of Chapter 144 of the Acts of 2022; maintenance of DPH licensure and CMS certification; completion of the new Chelsea facility move in 2024; and Holyoke’s scheduled new facility opening in 2026. The report also describes system and process modernization efforts: implementation of an Electronic Medical Record (EMR) (Holyoke in September 2024; Chelsea in November 2024), a comprehensive unified review and consolidation of policies and procedures (approximately 200 policies per Home) to standardize compliance across CMS, DPH, and the VA, and full operation of an Ombudsperson program at each Home with direct reporting to EOVS.

For quality, the report details the Homes’ Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program, including multidisciplinary monthly teams at each Home, EOVS Quality Management oversight (including a Deputy Assistant Secretary for Quality and a Quality Manager), and reporting through dashboards and quarterly progress updates to the EOVS Secretary. It also provides performance highlights: year-to-date Key Performance Indicator (KPI) results using CMS metrics (with Chelsea and Holyoke reported as performing above national averages on several measures), a reduction in falls (reported as a 17.3% decrease per 1,000 veteran days from 2021–2025), and improved medication-error identification and response using medication dispensing cabinet reporting; resident satisfaction is reported using monthly confidential surveys, with Chelsea and Holyoke favorability and overall annual ratings stated.

For finances and governance, the report states that the Homes are funded through the Commonwealth’s annual General Appropriations Act, that reimbursements received from residents/VA (except retained revenues) revert to the general fund, and that daily care charges may be waived or reduced based on income or qualifying disabilities. It provides FY2025 appropriation and revenue figures for each Home (Chelsea: $53.1M appropriation and $15.9M revenue; Holyoke: $34.3M appropriation and $9.3M revenue). It further summarizes program uniformity (licensure/certification alignment, compliance with DPH/CMS/VA via annual unannounced surveys, and standardized resident-centered programming), capital needs and construction status (Chelsea’s new facility occupancy and planned demolition/site improvements plus domiciliary redevelopment for veterans’ preference affordable housing; Holyoke’s replacement facility construction with specified VA and Commonwealth funding and occupancy timing), and VA accreditation status (continued full VA certification; Chelsea’s March 2024 formal certification after a deficiency-free survey in December 2023, and provisional certification after December 2024 annual survey deficiencies upon corrective action plan acceptance; Holyoke’s January 2025 survey with no deficiencies and full certification).

FULL SUMMARY

The bill creates a new licensing framework in Maryland for “members of the Foreign Service” and spouses of Foreign Service members, allowing them to practice in the State using an out-of-state license for the duration of an assignment/detail to Maryland. It establishes definitions (including “license,” “licensing authority,” and “member of the Foreign Service”), excludes certain categories from the subtitle’s coverage (interstate compact-authorized practice and the practice of law), and requires the relocating individual (or spouse) to provide assignment/detail notice to the licensing authority, remain in good standing with the issuing jurisdiction and similarly scoped licenses in other jurisdictions, have actively used the license during the prior two years, and comply with Maryland licensing authority standards of practice/discipline and any required continuing education.

Under the authorization, practice is limited to the discipline and scope permitted by the out-of-state license; and the licensing authority may not require the person to obtain a Maryland-issued license unless the individual seeks to practice in a different discipline or outside the scope described in the authorization. The bill clarifies that authorized individuals may practice to the same extent and in the same capacity as Maryland licensees, including supervising in situations where supervision would otherwise apply, and subjects them to the same disciplinary authority as Maryland licensees. It also allows each licensing authority to adopt regulations to carry out the new subtitle.

The bill also makes conforming statutory changes across numerous Maryland occupational/professional licensing titles by updating references so that many licensing/registration requirements include an express exception for authorized individuals under the new Foreign Service subtitle (e.g., provisions that generally require licenses/certificates/permits before practicing, and supervision requirements that generally reference “licensed” practitioners). In these conforming changes, the substituted language generally shifts from “licensed” to “authorized to practice” for supervision and related definitions, ensuring that Foreign Service license portability status is treated equivalently to Maryland licensure across covered professions.

The new Foreign Service licensing subtitle is effective October 1, 2026.

The legislation establishes a framework for out-of-state licensed professional counselors to provide clinical counseling services via telehealth to students enrolled in Maryland's institutions of higher education. This initiative aims to enhance mental health support for students by allowing licensed professionals from other states to offer their services under specific conditions.

Counselors must have an established therapeutic relationship with a student for at least six months before providing services in Maryland. They are permitted to offer counseling for a maximum of five days in any one month or 15 days in a calendar year. Additionally, out-of-state counselors are required to notify the State Board of Professional Counselors and Therapists of their intention to provide services and must update the Board within 15 days of any changes to their information.

The legislation includes a provision that if the Counseling Compact Commission begins issuing compact privileges for licensed professional counselors in member states, this Act will be abrogated without further action from the General Assembly. The Act is set to take effect on October 1, 2025, and will remain in effect for three years, expiring on September 30, 2028, unless further action is taken.

Overall, this legislation is expected to impact the mental health counseling industry by increasing the availability of counseling resources for students, potentially leading to improved mental health outcomes in higher education settings.

FULL SUMMARY

The law authorizes the State Board of Examiners for Audiologists, Hearing Aid Dispensers, Speech–Language Pathologists, and Music Therapists to issue limited licenses to practice music therapy. It expands the statutory definition of “practice of music therapy” to include a broad set of clinical activities (referrals, multidisciplinary collaboration, assessment, developing and implementing individualized treatment plans, evaluation and progress documentation, planning for when services end, minimizing barriers to services in the least restrictive environment, and client/family/caregiver education), while expressly excluding screening, diagnosis, or assessment of physical, mental, or communication disorders.

It creates a new limited-licensure pathway in the Health Occupations subtitle by adding § 2–4A–11.1. Under this provision, the Board must issue a limited license to applicants who (except for the examination) meet the standard music therapist license requirements, demonstrate they will practice only under specified supervision during the limited-license term, submit the required application, and pay the required application fee. The limited license is intended to allow supervised practice while completing remaining licensing requirements, expires on the first anniversary of its effective date, and may be renewed once for an additional one-year term if the holder meets renewal requirements, submits a renewal application, and pays a limited license renewal fee.

The new section also limits repeat licensing: if a limited license holder does not obtain a full license within two years after the initial limited license was issued, the individual must wait at least one year before applying for another limited license.

The act takes effect October 1, 2026.

FULL SUMMARY

The law authorizes the State Board of Examiners for Audiologists, Hearing Aid Dispensers, Speech–Language Pathologists, and Music Therapists to issue limited licenses to practice music therapy, and it adds a new statutory framework for those limited licenses.

To implement this, the bill expands the Health Occupations subtitle by adding a defined “limited license” term and establishing that the “practice of music therapy” includes multiple clinical activities (e.g., accepting referrals, collaborating with a client’s treatment team, assessment, developing and implementing an individualized music therapy treatment plan, evaluating and documenting progress, planning for discontinuation of services, minimizing barriers to least-restrictive delivery, educating clients/families/caregivers, and applying research and problem-solving skills). It also clarifies that “practice of music therapy” does not include screening, diagnosis, or assessment of physical, mental, or communication disorders.

A new section (§ 2–4A–11.1) requires the Board to issue a limited license to an applicant who meets existing license requirements except the examination, demonstrates the applicant will practice only under specified supervision, submits the required form, and pays the application fee set by the Board. The limited license is intended to permit practice while completing licensing requirements and authorizes practice only under the supervision of a fully licensed music therapist. The limited license expires on the first anniversary of its effective date and may be renewed only once for an additional one-year term if the holder continues to meet requirements, submits a renewal application, and pays a limited license renewal fee set by the Board.

If the holder has not received a full license within 2 years after the initial limited license was issued, the person must wait at least 1 year before applying for another limited license. The act takes effect October 1, 2026.

The proposed amendments to the Corrections Code of 1953 aim to enhance mental health services for incarcerated individuals in Michigan. A key feature of these amendments is the establishment of prerelease mental health discharge plans for individuals receiving mental health services or medications prior to parole. These plans will include mental health assessments, identification of risk factors, scheduled postrelease appointments, and access to necessary medications.

Additionally, the amendments require the Department of Corrections to conduct comprehensive psychiatric examinations within a week of an individual's arrival at a reception center, with ongoing screenings for significant diagnoses every six months during incarceration. The treatment and services provided must be culturally sensitive and may encompass various therapeutic programs, counseling, and educational support.

To ensure effective implementation, the Department is also mandated to train its employees in mental health crisis response, trauma interaction, and suicide prevention techniques. These changes are expected to impact various sectors, including mental health service providers, educational institutions, and organizations specializing in trauma-informed care and mental health training for correctional staff.

The financial implications of these amendments may involve increased funding for mental health services and training programs, although specific monetary impacts have not been detailed. Overall, the amendments represent a significant step toward improving mental health care for individuals in the correctional system.

The document outlines amendments to Minnesota Statutes 2024, focusing on the integration of occupational therapy services within behavioral health and mental health treatment frameworks. Key changes include the eligibility of occupational therapy services for grants, which are now available to counties, Indian tribes, children's collaboratives, and mental health service providers. This expansion aims to enhance support for children with emotional disturbances and young adults under 21, thereby increasing the demand for licensed occupational therapists and assistants in these sectors.

Additionally, the amendments establish specific qualifications for providers, ensuring that only licensed professionals deliver occupational therapy services in behavioral health settings. The definition of treatment teams is broadened to include various mental health professionals, emphasizing a collaborative approach to care. This includes the provision of medically necessary occupational therapy services in both intensive residential treatment and crisis stabilization settings.

The amendments also address the requirements for Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) teams, detailing the roles and qualifications of various specialists, including co-occurring disorder specialists and vocational specialists. These changes are designed to improve the structure and effectiveness of community-based mental health treatment, ensuring that teams are adequately staffed and trained to meet the needs of clients.

Furthermore, the document highlights the requirements for day treatment programs and children's therapeutic services, which must be provided by accredited entities. These programs are essential for stabilizing mental health and improving socialization skills among children and adolescents. The amendments may lead to increased operational costs for providers due to the need for qualified staff and compliance with documentation standards.

Overall, the amendments aim to enhance the range of services available to children and young adults with mental health needs, ensuring that occupational therapy is recognized as a critical component of therapeutic support while also addressing the operational and staffing requirements for mental health service providers.

FULL SUMMARY

The bill requires additional victim notification and enhances protections around identifying victims and victims’ participation in plea and sentencing proceedings. It amends Minnesota Statutes 2024 to expand how prosecutors and courts must confirm victim notice for plea recommendations and plea hearings, add court inquiry duties, strengthen confidentiality for minor victims in certain sexual-performance contexts, and broaden protections for victims against employer retaliation related to stalking. It also expands victim notification regarding eligibility for automatic expungement when a plea is presented or when postconviction sentence modifications are considered.

It revises Minnesota Statutes 2024, section 609.133, subdivision 4, to require that a prosecutor’s sentence-adjustment petition include: (1) whether there are identifiable victims (including the number of identifiable victims if names are not known), (2) the existence of any current or prior protective/no-contact orders, (3) the conviction date, and (4) the court file number; the filing fee remains waived and prosecutors may receive private/confidential data from corrections for the petition. In addition, it amends section 609.3471 to make victim-identity confidentiality apply specifically to minor victims’ identities (accessible to the public only by court order) while otherwise not authorizing denial of access to other data in the records, including the defendant’s identity.

For plea proceedings, it amends section 611A.03, subdivision 1, to require a prosecuting attorney, before the court’s consideration of the factual basis for a plea, to make a reasonable and good-faith effort to inform the victim of: the plea agreement recommendation and its likely jail/prison term if accepted; the right to be present at sentencing and at the hearing where the plea is presented, and to object to the agreement/disposition (and to ensure objections communicated to the prosecutor are conveyed to the court if the victim is absent); and the eligibility of the offense for automatic expungement under section 609A.015. It also adds a new section 611A.03, subdivision 4, requiring the court—at the plea hearing—to ask the prosecutor whether the victim has been notified of the plea agreement recommendation and the plea hearing and whether the victim wishes to express objections orally, in writing, or through the prosecutor.

Finally, it amends the victim-impact statement and postconviction notice framework. It updates section 611A.038 to require that, at sentencing/disposition hearings, the court asks the prosecutor whether the victim has been notified of the hearing (and, if the victim is in court, whether the victim wishes to submit an impact statement orally, in writing, or through the prosecutor/designee). It amends section 611A.039, subdivision 1, to clarify notice duties for sentence modifications and to require that, when the court is considering modifying a sentence for certain offenses, the prosecutor make reasonable good-faith efforts to notify the victim; required notice contents include the review date/time, location, contact information, and a statement that the victim may provide input about the sentence modification.

FULL SUMMARY

The bill creates a new Minnesota licensure framework for music therapists by establishing Minn. Stat. ch. 148H (sections 148H.01–148H.16). It defines the scope of “music-based interventions” and “practice of music therapy,” establishes a Music Therapy Advisory Council, and sets when licensure becomes mandatory, which titles are protected, and which persons are exempt. Key requirements include initial, temporary, and reciprocal licensure pathways; continuing education (100 CMTE hours every five-year cycle, including 3 ethics hours); biennial license renewal with continuing education and board-certification proof; and operational standards for client assessment, treatment planning, evaluation, documentation review/collaboration, and coordination when clients have communication or educational needs.

Operationally, starting January 1, 2027, individuals must be licensed as music therapists to practice music therapy, and protected title use (e.g., “licensed music therapist,” “music therapist,” “licensed professional music therapist,” “LPMT,” and similar terms) is prohibited unless licensed under ch. 148H. Use of “board-certified music therapist” is also restricted to individuals licensed under ch. 148H who hold valid certification from the Certification Board for Music Therapists. The chapter provides explicit exemptions for certain professionals using music incidentally, federal government music therapists (limited to official duties), music therapy integral to an accredited student program, supervised practice by a licensed professional music therapist where the person is not represented as a music therapist, and individuals trained/certified as “music healing” professionals within their specific certification scope (and not representing as a music therapist).

The bill establishes licensure qualifications and processes: general licensure requires age 18+, completion of academic/fieldwork for a bachelor’s (or higher) in music therapy from an approved/accredited program, and successful board certification (or transition into board certification). General application procedures require, among other items, proof of current board certification, attestation, a waiver authorizing professional-record access, required fees, fingerprint-based background check per Minn. Stat. 144.0572, and any other requested information; applicants must complete a new background check if more than one year elapses since the last application. Temporary licensure authorizes practice while an individual completes qualifying board-certification examination requirements within the temporary licensure period; temporary licenses expire after 12 months or upon commissioner decision and are explicitly not renewable. Reciprocity requires evidence of licensure in good standing in another jurisdiction with equivalent or higher qualifications, verification letters from each jurisdiction where the applicant practiced in the last five years, and a fingerprint-based background check.

For discipline and enforcement, the commissioner may investigate on complaints and can deny, suspend, revoke, condition, refuse to issue or renew, or impose civil penalties up to $10,000 per violation. Disciplinary grounds include submitting false/misleading information, failing to respond to written requests within 30 days, incompetent/negligent practice below community standard of care, violation of ch. 148H, unprofessional/unethical conduct, failure to refer for medical evaluation when appropriate, sexual misconduct, violations of court/board orders, and other specified “just cause” grounds. Licensees must cease practicing and using protected titles upon notice of denial of renewal or disciplinary action ending the right to practice. Fees are established via 148H.16 with a commissioner cap for licensing and renewal-related fees, nonrefundable fees, pro-ration of initial licensure fee for first-time licensees based on time to expiration/renewal, and penalty fees for practicing or using protected titles without a current license after expiration (and for unauthorized practice before licensure is issued). The bill also amends Minn. Stat. 144.0572, subd. 1 to include “music therapist” in the statute’s criminal-history background check provisions for initial licensure/relinsure and for renewal for those licensed before specified dates; this background check structure is tied to reporting new crimes to the commissioner.

The documents’ effective dates include: the ch. 148H scope section effective July 1, 2026; certain definitions/sections effective July 1, 2026; licensure becoming mandatory and title protections effective January 1, 2027 (with various other administrative/council provisions effective July 1, 2026 and some background-check-related language beginning earlier per the amended statute).

FULL SUMMARY

The bill expands Minnesota’s behavioral health service framework to include occupational therapy services and qualifications within multiple existing mental health and Medical Assistance service categories, and it adds related grant eligibility for children’s mental health programming.

Key statutory additions/changes include: (1) Minnesota Statutes 245I.02 adds definitions for “occupational therapist or occupational therapy assistant” and “occupational therapy services,” including the scope of occupational therapy services in behavioral health settings (screening, evaluation, intervention, and consultation related to client performance components, daily living skills, feeding/swallowing skills, play/leisure, educational participation, work participation, community mobility, and health/wellness). (2) Minnesota Statutes 245I.04 adds occupational therapist/assistant qualifications, requiring licensure and supervised work experience hours in behavioral health settings (480 hours for occupational therapists; 320 hours for occupational therapy assistants). (3) Minnesota Statutes 245I.04 adds an occupational therapy scope-of-practice rule limiting occupational therapists to their scope under 148.6404 and requiring occupational therapy assistants to work within 148.6404 under supervision of an occupational therapist.

The bill also makes occupational therapy available as part of specific service delivery requirements across several programs: it adds occupational therapy services to the eligible grant services and to children’s mental health grant programming under 245.4889. It then allows (and in some settings makes it part of the “required capacity/directly provide” list) occupational therapy services in intensive residential treatment (245I.23, subdivision 4) and residential crisis stabilization (245I.23, subdivision 5) by providing facilities the option/capacity to directly provide medically necessary occupational therapy. For adult day treatment (256B.0671), it authorizes adult day treatment providers to make skilled occupational therapy services available to clients by qualified occupational therapists/assistants. For psychiatric residential treatment facilities (256B.0941), it adds occupational therapists/assistants to service teams by requiring/allowing consultation with school staff and adding a specific optional capacity for psychiatric residential treatment facility providers to offer occupational therapy services.

In children’s therapeutic services and supports (256B.0943), the bill adds occupational therapy services as a covered service component and makes occupational therapy services part of eligible service components for medical assistance (subject to client need and inclusion in the individual treatment plan). It also adds occupational therapists/assistants as qualified individual providers for children’s therapeutic services and supports (including rules that skills training and documentation requirements recognize occupational therapists/assistants as providers in relevant components). For intensive nonresidential rehabilitative mental health services for youth (256B.0947), the bill updates definitions to include occupational therapists/assistants and adds that intensive nonresidential services may also include medically necessary occupational therapy services; it also adds occupational therapists/assistants as optional members of the specialized youth treatment team (core team possible member list). The bill includes a conforming addition of occupational therapy services to service components and eligibility requirements, and it generally ties coverage/authorization to being medically necessary and identified in the client’s individual treatment plan, with provider qualification requirements anchored in the new 245I.04 occupational therapy provisions.

FULL SUMMARY

The bill creates a new Minnesota licensing framework for music therapists by adding Minnesota Statutes, chapter 148G (Sections 148G.01 to 148G.16), which applies to individuals seeking licensure, those licensed, those who use protected titles, and those representing themselves as music therapists.

Key substantive requirements include protected-title restrictions and an unauthorized-practice prohibition. Effective January 1, 2026, individuals must be licensed under chapter 148G to practice music therapy. Use of specified titles (e.g., “licensed music therapist,” “music therapist,” “LPMT,” and similar) is prohibited unless licensed; use of “board-certified music therapist” or similar is prohibited unless licensed under chapter 148G and holding valid board certification. Chapter 148G also sets out licensure qualifications: general licensure requires being at least 18, completion of an approved/accredited music therapy bachelor’s-or-higher program, and passing board certification (or transition into board certification), subject to denial-of-licensure limits. Temporary licensure is available for applicants who meet defined eligibility (education/fieldwork with exam-sitting evidence, or equivalent out-of-state credential/certification evidence) and lasts 12 months; temporary licenses expire and are not renewable. Licensure renewal is required every two years and is conditioned on completing continuing education and maintaining board certification.

The bill establishes governance and professional standards. It creates a Music Therapy Advisory Council (appointed by the commissioner) with specified membership composition requirements, term limits, and duties including advising the commissioner on licensure standards and enforcement, reviewing competency-investigation summaries and applications, and making recommendations. It also defines “music-based interventions” and “practice of music therapy” (including treatment-plan development, but explicitly excluding diagnosis/screening/assessment of physical, mental, or communication disorders). Licensed music therapists must conduct music therapy assessments, develop individualized treatment plans with goals/objectives and specified approaches/interventions, evaluate client progress and modify plans, collaborate/educate clients and caregivers, and minimize barriers to services in the least restrictive environment. Additional requirements address referrals, communication and collaboration with treatment teams, and—where communication disorders are involved—collaboration with an audiologist or speech-language pathologist, plus restrictions on replacing those providers and limits on evaluating/examining/instructing/counseling regarding speech/language/swallowing disorders unless authorized to practice speech-language pathology.

Enforcement provisions grant the commissioner authority to investigate complaints and impose sanctions. Grounds for denial, discipline, or license action include submitting false information, failing to respond within 30 days, incompetent/negligent practice below the community standard of care, violating chapter provisions, aiding/abetting violations, impairment due to alcohol/drugs or other impairment, convictions related to music therapy practice, non-cooperation with investigations, misleading advertising, dishonest/unethical/unprofessional conduct, willful/careless disregard for client welfare, unauthorized provision of non-music-therapy interventions, prohibited referral/commission arrangements and incentive-payment arrangements that promote overutilization, abusive or fraudulent billing practices (including specified federal/state healthcare law violations), and sexual conduct or conduct that may be interpreted as sexual. Disciplinary actions range from refusal to grant/renew through revocation/suspension, lesser actions (e.g., reprimand or restrictions), civil penalties up to $10,000 per separate violation (structured to remove economic advantage, discourage violations, and reimburse investigation/proceeding costs), and any other statutory action. The bill amends an existing background-check statute (Minn. Stat. § 144.0572, subd. 1) by inserting “music therapist” into the existing criminal-history check requirements for initial licensure and renewal.

Chapter 148G also establishes continuing education requirements (100 CMTE hours per five-year cycle, three hours related to ethics) and proof of completion submitted with license renewal, specifies reinstatement rules for lapsed licenses (restoration within four years with requirements and a late fee; after four years, reapply as a new applicant), and requires notice to the commissioner of name/address/employment changes within 30 days. Fees are established under 148G.16 with caps for licensing, renewal, verification, duplication, and late fees; fees are nonrefundable, and fees collected are deposited in a state government special revenue fund. Penalty fees are created for unauthorized practice or protected-title use without a current license. Timing: the bill makes various sections effective July 1, 2025 and requires the unauthorized-practice and protected-title licensing requirement effective January 1, 2026; the background-check statute amendment in § 144.0572 is effective as specified for that statute’s operative “beginning” dates.

FULL SUMMARY

The bill establishes the North Carolina Board of Integrative Therapies within a newly created “Integrative Therapies Act” (new Article 44 in Chapter 90). It creates licensure requirements for two integrative therapies professions—art therapy and music therapy—by defining terms, setting board and advisory committee structure, authorizing rulemaking, investigations, disciplinary authority, fee setting, and enforcement mechanisms. It also creates specific licensure standards, renewal requirements, prohibited conduct tied to nonlicensed practice, and limitations on the scope of practice (especially for communication disorders in music therapy), plus reciprocity and collaboration requirements for licensed music therapists.

The Board is created with members appointed to three-year terms (two appointed by the General Assembly—each for initial art or music art—plus appointees by the Governor, including physicians and a public member). The bill creates advisory committees for each profession (an Art Therapy Advisory Committee and a Music Therapy Advisory Committee), each with three staggered members and authority to administer qualification/fitness review, recommend issuance/renewal/denial/suspension/revocation and discipline, and provide administrative support such as maintaining licensee lists and issuing wallet-sized identification cards. The Board’s powers include issuing, renewing, denying, suspending, or revoking integrative therapies licenses; conducting investigations and administrative/disciplinary hearings; adopting rules; and enforcing the Act through injunctions.

For art therapy licensure, applicants must be at least 18, of good moral character, hold national certification from the certifying entity (Art Therapy Credentials Board or successor), and pay required fees; licenses must be renewed annually. Licensed art therapists may be compensated only when providing services under a valid license, and public advertising must identify that services will be performed by a licensed individual; the title “North Carolina Licensed Art Therapist” is restricted to licensees and requires carrying the identification card when providing services. The bill allows reciprocity for comparable out-of-state licensees.

For music therapy licensure, applicants must be at least 18, of good moral character, provide proof of qualifying national certification (including exam passage by the Certification Board for Music Therapists or successor, or transition credentials with MT-BC), and pay required fees; licenses must be renewed annually. Compensation for music therapy is permitted only when services are performed by a licensed music therapist. Title restrictions apply to the use of “music therapist” and similar titles, while the bill provides exemptions (e.g., other licensed professionals using music incidentally within their licensed scope, credentialed persons practicing their own profession without representing as a music therapist, and music therapy as an integral part of an accredited student program). The bill limits supervision-based practice where certification is pending to a maximum of 180 days from the start of practice, and it adds a collaboration requirement before and during services (including coordinating with relevant care providers and, for communication-related needs, discussing the plan with an audiologist or speech-language pathologist). It further prohibits licensed music therapists from replacing audiology/speech-language pathology services, from evaluating/examining/instructing/counseling on speech-language disorders unless authorized to practice speech-language pathology, and from representing to the public that they are authorized to treat communication disorders.

The bill sets enforcement for violations with graduated penalties: first violation is a written warning; second violation is a civil penalty up to $200; third and subsequent violations are civil penalties up to $200 per violation and a Class 1 misdemeanor. It authorizes the Board to seek injunctions without bond. Fees for licenses and renewal are capped at specified amounts ($300 issuance, $200 application/exam, $350 annual renewal, and $200 late renewal). Initial Board and committee appointments have defined timing/term-start rules: initial Board appointments must be made by specific dates and begin January 1, 2027 for initial terms, and music therapy/art therapy enforcement provisions become effective when the Board certifies it has begun accepting license applications—180 days after certification, effective for acts committed on or after that date; most remaining provisions take effect when the act becomes law.

The document outlines significant amendments to regulations governing behavioral health and wellness practitioners in Nevada, aimed at establishing a comprehensive licensure and regulatory framework. These changes are designed to enhance the quality of services, ensure proper training, and expand access to mental health care, particularly through Medicaid coverage for licensed practitioners.

Key provisions include the establishment of licensure requirements overseen by the Board of Psychological Examiners, which will necessitate specific qualifications and background checks for applicants. The amendments also clarify the responsibilities of mental health professionals, emphasizing their duty to report threats and child abuse, as well as the importance of informed consent when using recordings for training purposes.

Additionally, the regulations address the practice of dietetics and wellness services, mandating that unlicensed individuals disclose their status and obtain client consent. The amendments reinforce standards of practice within the psychology profession, including requirements for continuing education and the handling of disciplinary actions against practitioners.

The document further emphasizes the confidentiality of communications between patients and behavioral health practitioners, ensuring that such communications are protected under privilege laws. It establishes mandatory reporting requirements for health care and social services professionals who suspect abuse or neglect of older or vulnerable persons, promoting swift investigations to protect affected individuals.

Overall, these amendments aim to strengthen the behavioral health system in Nevada, improve the reporting and handling of abuse cases, and enhance educational opportunities for health care providers, ultimately benefiting the healthcare and education sectors.

The legislative proposal aims to revise the governance and operational structures of various boards, commissions, and councils within the Office of Nevada Boards, Commissions, and Councils Standards. It seeks to consolidate and streamline the operations of professional and occupational licensing boards, enhancing efficiency and accountability. Key changes include the establishment of term limits for board members, standardization of compensation, and the appointment of executive directors by the Director of the Department of Business and Industry.

Significant eliminations of regulatory boards are proposed, with their responsibilities transferred to newly created entities, potentially reducing regulatory oversight in industries such as healthcare and design. Certain practices, like music therapy and homeopathic services, may be allowed to operate without a license. The bill mandates periodic reviews of all boards and commissions to assess their effectiveness, emphasizing stakeholder engagement and requiring entities to justify their continued existence.

Amendments also focus on enhancing family engagement and workforce development within educational commissions, aiming to improve educational outcomes and support services. The restructuring includes provisions for necessary administrative support and compensation for commission members. Additionally, new advisory committees and councils are being formed across various sectors, including education, healthcare, and environmental management, to address specific community needs and improve safety.

In the healthcare sector, new boards will be established for various professions, ensuring public representation and addressing the needs of military personnel regarding license expiration. The creation of the Beneficiary Advisory Council and Medicaid Advisory Committee aims to enhance Medicaid policy and services for welfare recipients. Changes in environmental governance include the establishment of the State Environmental Commission and the Emergency Medical Services Subcommittee.

Finally, amendments will enhance oversight and standards in behavioral health, barbering, medical laboratory services, and radiation therapy. A new Nevada Behavioral Wellness Alliance Board will oversee practices in the behavioral health sector, while the State Barbers’ Health and Sanitation Board will ensure health standards in barbering. Additionally, advisory subcommittees for medical laboratory services and radiation therapy will be formed to improve oversight and representation in these fields. Overall, the proposal represents a comprehensive effort to streamline operations, consolidate regulatory bodies, and enhance governance across multiple sectors in Nevada.

The document outlines proposed amendments to New York laws regarding the licensing and practice of music therapy, establishing a new article in the education law that formalizes the profession. These changes aim to enhance the quality of therapeutic services by ensuring that music therapists meet specific educational and experiential standards. The amendments will impact the healthcare and wellness industries, particularly those involved in mental health services, by introducing licensing requirements that may increase operational costs for practitioners.

Key components of the proposed regulations include the establishment of licensing requirements for both professional and clinical music therapists, with specific educational qualifications and supervised training hours mandated for each level. Additionally, the regulations specify that licensed music therapists must complete continuing education requirements to maintain their licenses, thereby promoting ongoing professional development and accountability within the field.

The amendments also address the roles of various licensed professionals in providing mental health services, clarifying the boundaries of practice for music therapists. This includes stipulations that licensed music therapists cannot prescribe medications or perform invasive procedures, necessitating collaboration with other healthcare providers when treating clients with serious mental illnesses.

Furthermore, the document discusses the licensing requirements for professional service limited liability companies and registered limited liability partnerships, emphasizing the necessity for members to hold valid licenses in their respective fields. This regulatory framework aims to ensure compliance with state laws governing professional services across various industries, including medical, dental, and creative arts therapy.

Overall, the proposed changes are expected to significantly impact the music therapy industry and related fields, promoting higher standards of practice and ensuring that practitioners are adequately qualified to provide therapeutic services.

The document outlines a legislative proposal in New York aimed at establishing regulations for the practice of music therapy, which includes licensing requirements and the formation of a state board for music therapy. The proposal emphasizes the clinical and evidence-based use of music interventions to achieve individualized goals for clients across various age groups. It directly impacts the music therapy industry and mental health services, with specific provisions for licensing and practice detailed in sections 8450 to 8459.

Licensed Professional Music Therapists must possess a baccalaureate degree in music therapy, complete 1,200 hours of supervised clinical training, and pass a national certification examination. In contrast, Licensed Clinical Music Therapists are required to hold a master’s degree or higher in music therapy or a related field, complete 1,500 hours of post-master's supervised experience, and also pass a national certification examination. Initial licensing fees are set at $175, with a triennial registration fee of $170.

The proposal includes mandatory continuing education requirements for licensed music therapists, who must complete a minimum of thirty-six hours of acceptable learning activities every three years. Additionally, licensed music therapists are required to collaborate with healthcare providers and treatment teams, particularly when working with clients with communication disorders.

The document also addresses regulations for professional service limited liability companies (PSLLCs) and partnerships in various professional fields, including music therapy. It specifies that partners in these services must be licensed under the appropriate articles of the education law, ensuring compliance and maintaining standards within the respective industries.

Overall, the regulations aim to standardize the practice of music therapy in New York, ensuring that practitioners meet specific educational and experiential criteria, thereby potentially enhancing the quality of services provided in this field.

The document outlines proposed amendments to New York's education law concerning recreational therapy. It introduces a new article that defines recreational therapy, establishes licensure requirements for recreational therapists, and mandates continuing education for these professionals. A state board for recreation therapy will be created to oversee these regulations, which will impact healthcare facilities, rehabilitation centers, and recreational therapy services.

Key components of the amendments include the establishment of a professional licensing process, provisions for limited permits, and exemptions for certain individuals. Licensed recreational therapists will be required to fulfill continuing competency requirements, which involve completing a minimum of 30 hours of learning activities every three years.

Additionally, the document specifies fees associated with obtaining and maintaining licensure, including costs for examinations, re-examinations, and triennial registration. Limited permits will also incur fees for issuance and renewal.

Recreation therapists must document their continuing competency activities and submit this documentation upon request. A mandatory continuing competency fee will be imposed, which must be paid at the beginning of each triennial registration period.

Overall, these regulations aim to ensure that practitioners in the field of recreational therapy meet established educational and professional standards, thereby promoting effective and safe practices.

FULL SUMMARY

The bill renames Ohio’s chemical dependency professionals licensing structure by replacing the former “Chemical Dependency Professionals Board” with a “Behavioral Health Professionals Board,” and it creates a new licensing/certification framework under revised Chapter 4758. It also expands board-regulated practice beyond substance-use counseling to include peer supporter roles and “qualified mental health assistant/specialist/practitioner” service categories, with detailed definitions, licensing/certification categories, supervision rules, permissible activities, and board governance.

Key licensure/credential changes include: (1) establishing/using Chapter 4758.011 to reinterpret any references to the “chemical dependency professionals board” as the “behavioral health professionals board” (Sec. 4758.011); (2) creating new certification standards and practice limits for peer supporters (including peer recovery, youth, and family peer supporters), a peer support supervisor endorsement, and qualified mental health assistant/specialist/practitioner certificates (e.g., Sс. 4758.38, 4758.39, 4758.40–4758.57, and related peer/supervisor provisions); (3) adding explicit restrictions on unauthorized practice using protected titles and on providing peer support or qualified mental health services for pay unless properly certified/endorsed (Sec. 4758.02); and (4) specifying continuing education requirements for renewed credentials (Sec. 4758.51) and credential expiration/restoration timeframes (Sec. 4758.26 and 4758.27).

In addition to credentialing and scope-of-practice rules, the bill provides board governance and operational requirements for the new behavioral health board: board membership composition and appointment structure (Sec. 4758.10–4758.12), meeting and quorum rules (Sec. 4758.13), rulemaking and ethical/codes-of-conduct framework (Sec. 4758.20, 4758.23), disciplinary authority and investigation/enforcement procedures including confidentiality requirements for complaint/investigation materials (Sec. 4758.30–4758.32 and related sections), and administrative processing of applications (Sec. 4758.35–4758.36). It also adds a supervision structure for peer supporters (Sec. 4758.651) and qualified mental health roles (Sec. 4758.661), including who may supervise and what practice is permitted at each certification level.

Transition and cross-agency implementation provisions include: (1) collaboration with the Department of Medicaid to evaluate Medicaid-provided qualified mental health services and, at the Board’s discretion, issue corresponding certifications (Section 4); (2) a process allowing certain individuals who held Department of Behavioral Health accepted peer certificates under Medicaid rules to apply to continue peer support (Section 5) and permitting the Board to allow continued practice until Board-specified rule effective dates (within specified limits); (3) governance transition rules allowing the Governor to delay filling certain Board positions tied to newly certified peer supporters and qualified mental health roles, and quorum/membership adjustments to accommodate delays (Section 6); and (4) a temporary working group to recommend/review the Board’s initial rules for qualified mental health duties (Section 7). The bill also repeals the prior “chemical dependency professionals board” chapter provisions including existing Section 4758.52 and repeals numerous other listed Chapter 4758 sections and revises telehealth and continuing-education/fee-related provisions in other chapters, as reflected in the extensive section list of amendments and repeals.

FULL SUMMARY

The bill updates Oklahoma’s medical licensure framework administered by the State Board of Medical Licensure and Supervision. It amends the definition and practice scope of “practice of medicine and surgery,” including clarifications related to diagnostic/treatment services delivered through electronic communications and jurisdictional/submission-to-jurisdiction language. It also adds/clarifies that physicians are not required to obtain Maintenance of Certification (MOC) as a condition of licensure, and defines MOC.

For allopathic physician applicants, the bill amends required application attestations/documentation and other eligibility standards in the full licensure pathway, including changes to the content list provided to the Board. For international medical graduates (foreign applicants and IMGs), the bill revises eligibility structure by clarifying when foreign/IMG applicants must meet full-and-unrestricted licensure requirements, adding/adjusting degree/equivalency evidence criteria, requiring English-language competency evidence via ECFMG, expanding Board authority to require progressive graduate training of up to 24 months, and tightening credential verification (including requiring original source verification of ECFMG Certification or MCCQUE Certification). It also refines the limited-licensure pathway for international medical school graduates by setting out eligibility findings, supervision and facility practice limitations, annual renewal of limited licenses, and Board authority to grant full and unrestricted licensure after a defined period conditioned on good standing and specific USMLE score documentation.

The bill creates new licensure categories: (1) a new “special training license” for postgraduate training (codified at 59 O.S. § 493.4a) with practice limitations, Board-established restrictions, and annual renewal tied to Board approval/evaluation; (2) a “physician emeritus” licensure status option for holders who retire, with no fee for obtaining/maintaining emeritus status. It amends emergency physician licensure suspension procedures by requiring immediate full hearing before the Board under applicable administrative procedures after an emergency temporary suspension. It further establishes new authority for background checks by creating an explicit national criminal history background check requirement for initial athletic trainer licensure (new 59 O.S. § 530.1), and separately authorizes national criminal history checks for initial occupational therapist licensure (new 59 O.S. § 888.7A).

For athletic trainers, the bill modifies the Athletic Trainers Advisory Committee composition and clarifies committee functions (advising and assisting with examinations, excluding disciplinary matters). It amends athletic trainer licensure eligibility and application/renewal-related provisions, adjusts misdemeanor penalty language for violations, and updates fee and renewal mechanics so that athletic trainer licenses renew annually by August 31 (including a beginning date set in the statute). It also amends aspects of respiratory care licensure and practice (including endorsement criteria and adding telemedicine as a location for respiratory care practice subject to physician orders and supervision) and updates medical malpractice claim reporting to licensing boards by insurers/parties (retaining timelines, privileged reporting, and remedial/disciplinary authority; plus annual reporting to legislative leadership with names/addresses omitted). Finally, it repeals the prior version of the IMG foreign applicant statute at 59 O.S. § 493.2 and sets the act’s effective date as November 1, 2026.

The 83rd Oregon Legislative Assembly has enacted provisions to regulate the practice of art therapy, establishing a framework for licensing art therapists within the health and mental health industries. The Health Licensing Office will issue licenses for provisional licensed art therapists, licensed art therapists, and licensed certified art therapists, ensuring that practitioners meet specific educational and ethical standards.

To obtain a license, applicants must be at least 18 years old, possess a master’s degree from an approved program, and demonstrate supervised practice. Provisional licensed art therapists can transition to full licensure after completing two years of supervised mental health practice. Licensed practitioners are required to adhere to rules set by the Health Licensing Office, which include compliance with ethical standards and professional conduct.

Additionally, the 2025 Act modifies the Oregon medical assistance program to include reimbursement for behavioral health services provided by licensed art therapists. This change is expected to enhance access to art therapy services within the behavioral health industry.

The implementation of these changes is set to occur in stages, with specific sections of the Act becoming operative on designated dates. The inclusion of art therapists in the reimbursement framework may have financial implications for both service providers and the state’s medical assistance budget, although specific monetary impacts are not detailed. Overall, these developments aim to professionalize art therapy and expand its availability to those in need of behavioral health services.

The bill establishes the “Music Therapy Practice Act,” creating definitions for “music therapist” (a person certified by the Certification Board for Music Therapists or a successor) and “music therapy” (clinical, evidence-based use of music interventions through a therapeutic relationship to achieve personalized goals across multiple domains and populations).

It prohibits any individual who is not a certified music therapist from (1) holding oneself out as a music therapist or as being certified to practice music therapy, and (2) using the initials “MT-BC” or any other words/letters/abbreviations/insignia that indicate or imply music-therapist status. A limited exception allows use of music in the person’s profession or occupation as long as the person does not engage in the prohibited conduct.

The bill sets criminal and civil/consumer consequences for violations: knowing, reckless, or intentional violations of the prohibitions are classified as a misdemeanor of the third degree, and any violation is also deemed an unfair or deceptive act or practice under Pennsylvania’s Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law.

The act takes effect 60 days after enactment.

The document outlines significant amendments to the regulations governing music therapy practice in Pennsylvania. A new licensing framework has been established for professional music therapists, requiring applicants to meet specific educational and clinical training standards, pass a certification examination, and maintain active certification. This framework aims to ensure that only qualified individuals can practice music therapy, thereby enhancing the profession's credibility and standards.

A State Board of Social Workers, Marriage and Family Therapists, Professional Counselors, and Professional Music Therapists has been created to oversee the licensing process and ensure compliance with the new regulations. This board will consist of 15 members, including licensed professionals from each relevant field, and will set operating procedures for the profession.

The amendments are expected to have a significant impact on the healthcare and mental health industries, particularly in therapeutic services. By recognizing music therapy as a distinct profession, there may be an increased demand for licensed music therapists in various settings, such as hospitals, schools, and private practices.

Additionally, the regulations stipulate that licensed professional music therapists must collaborate with healthcare providers and treatment teams in their practice. They are also restricted from using certain titles unless they are licensed under the new act, which aims to protect the integrity of the profession.

Overall, these changes are designed to enhance the regulation and professional standards of music therapy in Pennsylvania, ensuring public safety and welfare in therapeutic services while potentially affecting operational practices and compliance costs for professionals in related fields.

FULL SUMMARY

The bill expands and modernizes Pennsylvania’s Social Workers, Marriage and Family Therapists and Professional Counselors Act to regulate “professional art therapy” and establish a licensure pathway for art therapists alongside existing social work, marriage and family therapy, and professional counseling licensing structures. It adds definitions and practice/credential concepts for art therapy, including “art therapy,” “art therapy services,” “practice of professional art therapy,” “professional art therapy assessment,” and supervision-related terms, and it updates the Act’s legislative intent and the regulated population to include licensed professional counseling and licensed professional art therapy.

Key changes to licensure include adding a new professional art therapist licensure qualification section (Section 7(h) additions) with detailed eligibility requirements covering age, good moral character (including individualized assessment for criminal convictions), specified graduate education in art therapy (or closely related board-approved programs), supervised clinical experience hour thresholds, post-graduate supervised experience, completion of supervised internship hours, and competency testing via the Art Therapy Credentials Board Examination (or substantially equivalent exam approved by the board). The bill also adds authorization for licensed professional art therapists to engage in independent practice (Section 7(h.1)), creates a specific two-year renewal requirement for the professional art therapist license with continuing education content requirements (including ethics, child abuse recognition/reporting, and suicide prevention) and allows time extensions for completing remaining continuing education under conditions and board audit; it further adds issuance/renewal mechanics for a “licensed associate art therapist” track (including supervision requirements and limitations on autonomous practice).

Administrative and regulatory updates include enlarging the State Board membership and explicitly including professional counselors and professional art therapists within board composition and functions; it amends board powers to adopt/ revise rules that can include standards for professional art therapy and licensed associate art therapists; and it adds an exemption from licensure examination for professional art therapists meeting specific practice-history, education, and credential requirements (Section 9(d) addition). The bill also adds endorsement-by- reciprocity pathways for professional art therapist licensing without examination under specified criteria in Section 10.1(d), updates reinstatement and unlawful-practice provisions to include professional art therapy and professional counselor licenses, and requires restriction on use of the titles “licensed professional art therapist,” “licensed associate art therapist,” and related titles—prohibiting independent practice and title use without an appropriate license in good standing, subject to enumerated exceptions (including certain Commonwealth employment, holders of valid credentials from another licensing regime, supervised trainees, and students enrolled in accredited programs who identify only as “art therapy student” or “art therapy intern”).

Implementation timing is staged: the amendments/additions to Sections 4, 16.7, 17(b), and 20(a) take effect 24 months after enactment, while the remaining provisions take effect 60 days after enactment; within 60 days of the effective date of the applicable nomination provision, the Governor must nominate two professional members to serve as the licensed professional art therapist members of the board, and the board must promulgate final regulations within 18 months to carry out the act.

The document outlines significant amendments to the licensure requirements for social workers, marriage and family therapists, professional counselors, and music therapists in Pennsylvania. A key focus of these amendments is the introduction of regulations for the practice of music therapy, which includes establishing licensing requirements for professional music therapists to ensure that only qualified individuals provide these services.

To obtain a license as a professional music therapist, applicants must demonstrate good moral character, complete education and clinical training as defined by the American Music Therapy Association, and pass a certification examination. Additionally, individuals with felony convictions related to controlled substances may be eligible for licensure after a specified period, provided they meet certain rehabilitation criteria.

The amendments also stipulate that licensed music therapists must collaborate with healthcare providers and educational teams before delivering services, ensuring that they do not replace the roles of audiologists or speech-language pathologists. Furthermore, the board will maintain a public record of licensed professionals, enhancing transparency within the profession.

Overall, these changes aim to elevate the standards of practice within the mental health and music therapy fields, ensuring that practitioners are adequately trained and certified, which is expected to improve the quality of care provided to clients.

The document details amendments to the Tennessee Code Annotated concerning the professional music therapy advisory committee within the board of examiners in psychology. It specifically removes subdivision (34) from Section 4-29-246(a) and introduces a new subdivision in Section 4-29-248 that establishes the professional music therapy advisory committee.

These changes are significant for the fields of music therapy and psychology, as they may affect professionals and businesses that provide music therapy services. The act is designed to enhance the regulatory framework surrounding music therapy practices.

The amendments are set to take effect upon becoming law, with the public welfare necessitating their implementation. The bill was passed on February 24, 2025, and received gubernatorial approval in March 2025, although the exact date of approval is not specified.

No specific financial implications are mentioned in the document.

The document commemorates “Tennessee Music Therapy Week” by declaring that the State will celebrate the week of March 2, 2025 as “Tennessee Music Therapy Week.” It sets out findings about the purpose and benefits of music therapy, defines music therapy in clinical terms, describes the role and credentials of music therapists, and references Tennessee’s existing music therapy infrastructure and education options.

It also notes Tennessee’s prior statutory action related to music therapy—specifically that a May 28, 2024 law created a music therapy certificate under the Board of Examiners in Psychology and established a Professional Music Therapy Advisory Committee to support quality care for Tennessee residents.

The resolution directs that an appropriate copy be prepared for presentation, with a procedural instruction that certain identifying language (House or Senate designation) be omitted from the copy presented and substituted with language appearing after the State seal upon proper request.

The bill amends Tennessee’s provisions governing the professional music therapy advisory committee associated with the Board of Examiners in Psychology.

It removes subdivision (34) from Tennessee Code Annotated § 4-29-246(a), thereby changing the list of advisory committees referenced in that subsection. It also amends Tennessee Code Annotated § 4-29-248 by inserting a new subdivision explicitly including the “Professional music therapy advisory committee of the board of examiners in psychology, created by § 63-11-601.”

The act becomes effective upon becoming a law, with a public welfare clause as provided in the bill text.

The document establishes a licensing and regulatory framework for music therapists in Texas, aimed at enhancing professional standards and accountability within the health and wellness industry. The Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation will oversee the licensing process, requiring music therapists to hold a relevant degree, complete clinical training, and pass a certification examination. Additionally, they must adhere to professional standards set by the certifying entity.

Music therapists are required to collaborate with other licensed professionals, such as physicians and speech-language pathologists, when providing services to clients with specific needs, particularly those related to communication disorders. However, they are prohibited from evaluating or treating speech, language, communication, or swallowing disorders unless they hold a license in speech-language pathology. Misrepresentation of qualifications to the public is also not allowed.

The document outlines the establishment of an advisory board to support the regulatory framework, with members appointed by the Texas Commission of Licensing and Regulation. This board will play a crucial role in guiding the implementation of the new licensing requirements and ensuring compliance with professional standards.

Overall, these changes are expected to significantly impact the music therapy industry in Texas by creating a structured regulatory environment that influences operational practices and compliance for music therapists. The framework aims to promote higher standards of care and professionalism in the delivery of music therapy services.

FULL SUMMARY

The bill makes an occupational licensing policy change by removing state licensing/certification requirements for multiple occupations. It specifically repeals the occupational licensing framework in Utah Code Title 58, Chapter 64, covering licensure for (1) commercial interior designers, (2) deception detection, and (3) music therapy (the bill’s “Repeals” list shows the full chapter sections repealed, including general licensure requirements, qualifications, license terms/renewal, exemptions, disciplinary grounds, and related provisions including “deception detection instruments”).

It also makes targeted conforming changes to other Utah Code provisions that reference occupations being removed from licensing. First, Utah Code § 58-1-301.5 (Division access to Bureau of Criminal Identification records) is amended by removing the cross-reference to the repealed § 58-64-302 from the list of criminal-background-check-triggering licensure/certification sections.

Second, Utah Code § 63G-6a-103 (Definitions) is amended to remove references to “commercial interior designer” from the definition of “Design professional,” and the definition subsection relating to “Service” is conformed by removing/replacing certain bracketed wording (technical and conforming changes consistent with eliminating the commercial interior designer licensing category).

The bill repeals multiple specified sections in Chapter 58-64 and repealer sections list all operative parts of those chapters. The bill takes effect May 6, 2026.

FULL SUMMARY

The bill makes statewide fiscal and budget governance changes for the 2025–2027 biennium by revising appropriations amounts and appropriation conditions across numerous state agencies and dedicated accounts, adding and tightening earmarks, eligibility and rule conditions, limits on transfers, and program implementation requirements. It directs multiple agencies’ spending toward specific purposes through detailed budget provisos (including performance audits, court-related funding conditions and reporting, public defense and civil legal aid earmarks, and election administration security and technology spending limits), while also imposing additional oversight, data collection, and recurring reporting obligations. The bill further strengthens spending control by expanding or clarifying rules on when agencies may transfer or modify appropriations among programs and specified-purpose amounts, including requiring Office of Financial Management approvals and related notice/accounting duties. It also establishes or revises codified fiscal administration rules governing certain accounts and fiscal mechanisms (including changes involving building fees/accounting and certain transfer and wage-related provisions), and it provides for specific “sundry claims” payments and other account transfers, including bond-related appropriation adjustments.

The bill creates, revises, or re-specifies the operation of multiple state accounts by setting receipts deposit rules, defining permissible expenditures, and in several cases authorizing additional treasurer transfers during 2025–2027. Among the account-related changes, it limits domestic violence co-responder account spending to domestic violence co-responder grants and other domestic violence programs or services for fiscal years ending June 30, 2026 and June 30, 2027, and revises the waste reduction, recycling, and litter control account by suspending specified subsections during 2025–2027, allowing legislative appropriation for general administrative purposes at the Department of Ecology, permitting transfers of money from the account to the general fund during the biennium, and retaining core allocation and oversight structures. It also revises the derelict vessel removal account by clarifying eligible reimbursement purposes and rates, maintaining priority criteria for hazardous or navigation-blocking vessels, and allowing general-fund transfers from the account during 2025–2027. Additional account changes include revising the water quality permitting account so fees are designed to recover specified permit-related costs (without exceeding them), permitting that account’s use for general operating expenditures during 2025–2027, and requiring a biennial progress report; updating assisted living Medicaid payment system components and delaying a scheduled rate rebase until the following biennium; adjusting education technology and information technology revolving fund expenditure authority to allow expenditures without a separate appropriation while retaining allotment procedures and transferring excess fund balance during 2025–2027; and adding biennium-specific school construction deposits that require additional fixed amounts be deposited first into the education legacy trust account before the remainder goes to the common school construction fund.

The bill also changes fee-related policy in the health professions licensing system by reaffirming that professional, occupational, and business licensing program costs are to be borne by licensees, authorizing the Secretary to set fee schedules by rule, prohibiting certain peer support specialist certification/examination/renewal fees, limiting peer support specialist certification-related fees between July 1, 2025 and July 1, 2030, and restricting certain substance use disorder professional certification/renewal fees between July 1, 2024 and July 1, 2029 unless a specific appropriation is provided. It includes governance provisions for statewide enterprise and technology investment processes, including requirements related to IT investment pool gate approvals and project planning/quality expectations for large technology initiatives. Finally, it adds a severability clause and provides an immediate effectiveness statement taking effect immediately to preserve public peace, health, or safety or to support state government and existing public institutions.

FULL SUMMARY

The bill changes Washington’s music therapy licensing law by expanding the temporary exemptions from the general prohibition on practicing music therapy (or using the “music therapist” title/designation) without a license.

It amends RCW 18.233.050 (and references a 2023 session law section) to allow, under supervision of a licensed music therapist, an applicant for a music therapy license to provide music therapy for up to six months from the start of practice when the applicant’s license application meets the requirements in RCW 18.233.030, except that examination results required under RCW 18.233.030 have not yet been verified by the department. The amendment also adds a new explicit exemption (previously not listed) for music therapy practice as an integral part of a program of study for students enrolled in a music therapy education program.

The bill retains the existing scope limitation: unless authorized to practice speech-language pathology, music therapists may not evaluate, examine, instruct, or counsel on speech/language/communication/swallowing disorders or conditions, and professional music therapists may not represent that they are authorized to treat a communication disorder (while allowing representation that they may work with clients who have a communication disorder and address communication skills). It also keeps the existing recommendations/requirements that licensees review relevant client information before providing services and review student needs with the appropriate team for educational services.

The act takes effect January 1, 2028 (new Section 2).

FULL SUMMARY

The bill makes targeted fiscal and policy changes for the 2025–2027 biennium across multiple state agencies and programs by revising appropriation amounts, adding and revising spending conditions and limitations, directing specific uses of General Fund and dedicated-account funds, and establishing new one-time grants, reporting duties, and administrative requirements. It revises appropriations for legislative and judicial agencies by adjusting General Fund and dedicated-account amounts and by adding conditions covering reporting, audit scopes, funding limitations, and project- or case-tied payments; it also expands performance-audit and oversight review mandates with required reports by specified deadlines covering topics such as juvenile rehabilitation staffing and safety measures, ignition interlock compliance, and other statewide auditing and accountability activities. The bill directs funding to courts and public defense and civil legal aid for defined purposes—including juvenile justice processing, truancy and at-risk youth services, appellate or backlog representation, and specified State v. Blake resentencing/vacatur and refund processing—subject to eligibility constraints and proportional distribution rules if funds are insufficient. It places additional controls on Governor’s Office, elections, archives, and public disclosure funding, including limits on how public disclosure transparency funds may be used and annual investment/project reporting requirements.

The bill implements major budget execution and technology governance controls by revising the Office of Financial Management—Information Technology Investment Pool appropriations and imposing detailed conditions on how covered projects receive funds from the information technology investment revolving account, including reliance on incorporated LEAP omnibus project lists, WaTech gate certification, agency gate-specific technology budgeting, project charters and stage-based allocations with retained holds, dashboard and transparency posting rules, restrictions on early approvals, strengthened governance and oversight requirements, and procedures for suspension or termination with legislative fiscal committee reporting. It identifies the covered information technology projects (resident portal; HRMS cloud migration; d365 ERP; secure access Washington) and allocates responsibility for administrative implementation costs to the investment revolving account or the project’s own funds. The bill also updates bond-related appropriations for debt and bond sale expenses, creates new “sundry claims” appropriations for FY 2026 for specified reimbursed criminal defendant claims and wrongful conviction compensation, revises foundational public health services appropriations to maintain core public health IT infrastructure and staffing, and adjusts appropriations and expenditure-account direction for the Indian Health Improvement Reinvestment Account.

For workforce, health, and specialized program funding, the bill revises or restructures multiple transfers and restricted appropriations tied to named statutory accounts, adds new restricted appropriations (including accounts for wildfire response and forest restoration/community resilience, new higher-education operating fees and operating accounts, Yakima criminal justice costs distributions, a wild horse racing commission operating account, and an Andy Hill cancer research endowment match transfer with limits on the duration of matching grants), and updates “state revenues for distribution” and “transfers” to adjust FY 2026–FY 2027 distribution and transfer amounts while keeping within available statutory distribution limits for the specified purposes. It updates retirement contribution appropriations and timing requirements for multiple retirement systems, updates compensation and insurance benefit provisions by adjusting employer funding rate caps and reaffirming retiree subsidy limits, specifies embedded school district health care authority funding, and adds or confirms coverage assumptions while limiting certain benefit expansions unless separately appropriated. The bill revises the Initiative 732 state employee COLA parameters and establishes a wildland firefighters enrollment study with a required legislative report.

Finally, the bill creates governance and study mechanisms, including a new public bank work group within the Department of Financial Institutions with required implementation and interim reports, and it establishes a Joint Legislative-Executive Committee on Budget Transparency and Fiscal Sustainability with defined membership, co-chair governance, workstreams and interview/report deliverables, technical-assistance authority (funded only through the committee’s described process), meeting and travel rules, and shared expense payment responsibilities. It also modifies education finance and governance provisions by directing transfers from higher-education building accounts to an institutions of higher education operating fees account during the 2025–2027 biennium, updates several public-account and fee-related statutes to reflect fiscal-policy changes (including specified transfer authority and fee governance rules), and changes a retirement-system actuarial rate-setting mechanic by setting the referenced benefit improvement amortization period to zero during the rate window from July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2029, with severability and immediate effect provisions included for the act.

The proposed legislation introduces comprehensive changes to the regulation of music therapy in Wisconsin, establishing a new licensing framework and oversight mechanisms. It replaces the existing music therapist registration credential with a music therapist license, requiring individuals to hold a bachelor's degree or higher in music therapy and current board certification from the Certification Board for Music Therapists.

A Music Therapy Examining Board will be created within the Department of Safety and Professional Services, consisting of three members: two licensed music therapists and one public member. This board will oversee the licensing process, ensuring that only qualified individuals can practice music therapy and that they adhere to established practice standards.

The legislation defines the scope of music therapy practice, emphasizing collaboration with other healthcare professionals while explicitly excluding the diagnosis of disorders. It also outlines the licensure process, including requirements for renewal and maintenance of licenses, ensuring that music therapists remain current in their qualifications.

Additionally, the changes aim to enhance professional standards within the music therapy field, impacting related sectors such as mental health and substance abuse prevention. The new regulations are expected to establish a formal framework for the practice of music therapy, promoting accountability and quality in therapeutic services.

The proposed legislation introduces comprehensive changes to the regulation of music therapy in Wisconsin, establishing a new licensing framework and creating a Music Therapy Examining Board. This board will consist of three members, including two licensed music therapists and one public member, appointed for staggered terms. The legislation repeals the existing music therapist registration credential and requires individuals to obtain a music therapist license, which necessitates proof of board certification and a relevant degree.

The new regulations define the practice of music therapy and prohibit individuals from using music therapist titles without a valid license. Music therapists will be required to collaborate with other healthcare providers and educational teams, ensuring that their services do not overlap with those of audiologists or speech-language pathologists. The legislation also eliminates the option for music therapists to obtain a separate psychotherapy license, as psychotherapy is not included in the defined scope of practice.

These changes are expected to significantly impact the music therapy industry, including practitioners and educational institutions offering music therapy programs. The establishment of formal licensure and practice standards aims to enhance the professionalism and accountability of music therapists, ultimately benefiting clients and the broader healthcare sector.

FULL SUMMARY

The document is a package of rulemaking hearing rules for the Tennessee Board of Occupational Therapy (Chapter 1150-02, General Rules Governing the Practice of Occupational Therapy). It changes multiple existing provisions across the chapter and also adds two new rules: a new “Occupational Therapy Licensure Compact” rule (1150-02-.22) and a related compact enforcement/explanation section. It also updates definitions and substantive requirements governing licensure/reciprocity procedures, fees, supervision, continued competence, a new certification path for dry needling to the upper limb (via a new subparagraph and new rule text), and corrections to incorporated external guideline references.

Key substantive changes begin in Rule 1150-02-.01 (Definitions), where definitions are revised/substituted for terms including “Advertising,” “Applicant,” “Board’s administrative office,” “Board Designee,” “Continued Competence,” “Direct contact,” “Dry Needling,” “Electrical Stimulation Certification,” “Experiential Component (EC),” and “Supervision,” among others; the rule also updates the enumerated meaning of telehealth/telemedicine/provider-based telemedicine. In Rule 1150-02-.02 (Scope of Practice), the Board adopts the AOTA “Occupational Therapy Code of Ethics” effective December 2020 and the NBCOT “Candidate/Certificant Code of Conduct” effective July 2022, except where they conflict with Tennessee law/rules; additionally, the rule defines/uses specified ethical documents and expands/updates the incorporated “universal precautions” approach. In Rule 1150-02-.03 (Necessity of Licensure), multiple paragraphs are revised to (i) clarify unlawful practice/holding out, (ii) specify licensure restrictions for teaching/instruction in accredited programs (including ACOTE-accredited/candidacy programs), and (iii) update statutory citation authority. In Rule 1150-02-.04 (Qualifications for Licensure), the rule adds a new certification eligibility pathway for “Dry Needling of the Upper Limb Certification,” adds a new paragraph for “Internationally trained applicants” requiring compliance with T.C.A. § 63-13-214, and updates a separate competency requirement related to electrical stimulation.

Licensure procedures and fees are revised. In Rule 1150-02-.05 (Procedures for Licensure), a new reciprocity/proof pathway is added allowing the Board to issue a license when an applicant holds current licensure/certification in another state/DC/territory and possesses education/experience meeting or exceeding Tennessee requirements. Also revised are physical agent modality certification documentation requirements and the “Physical agent modality certification” paragraph structure. Rule 1150-02-.06 (Fees) changes the fee schedule for occupational therapists and occupational therapy assistants: the application fee is reduced (OT $125 to OTA $100 appears in the substituted schedule), renewal (biennial) fee is reduced (OT $135 to $115 for OTA in the substituted schedule), while other listed fees (e.g., late renewal fee and duplicate-related amounts as shown) are maintained at specified values; the rule authority is also updated. In Rules 1150-02-.07, .08, .09, and .10, rule authority citations are updated and certain operational standards are adjusted; notably, Rule 1150-02-.10 (Supervision) revises supervision requirements for documentation, reporting expectations, and supervision of students, including a minimum eight (8) hours of direct supervision per week for OTD experiential component scenarios where clinical practice/OT-education is included, and modifications to permitted supervision conditions and records.

Continued competence and dry needling are substantially reworked. In Rule 1150-02-.12 (Continued Competence), the cycle is changed from a “two (2) year” framing to a “twenty-four (24) month” framing, with updated credit rules and timing references. The rule requires 24 continued competence credits within the 24 months preceding the licensure renewal month (with specific limits on carryover and subject exclusions, and credit categories including direct OT service delivery credits and ethics/legal credits). Documentation and proof requirements are updated: each licensee must submit proof through the Board’s approved CE tracking system; retain documentation for five (5) years; and provide evidence within 45 days of a Board request. Reinstatement/reactivation of expired/retired/inactive licenses is updated with an explicit two (2) year documentation period preceding reinstatement/reactivation year, and the Board discretion to require additional education/supervised clinical practice/exams is retained. A new/updated certification pathway is implemented in connection with dry needling: Rule 1150-02-.04 adds the dry needling upper limb certification eligibility requirement, and Rule 1150-02-.21 (Dry Needling to the Upper Limb) revises the practitioner eligibility statement, training requirements, and limits delegation (dry needling may only be performed by a licensed OT and may not be delegated to an OTA or support personnel). Rule 1150-02-.21 also specifies required pre-service education hours (50 hours broadly covering foundational areas, plus 24 hours with upper-limb-specific instruction broken into six required content areas), limits new-license practice to at least one (1) year from initial licensure unless equivalent pre-licensure coursework demonstrates compliance, and requires patient information disclosure covering definition/description and risks/benefits/side effects.

Finally, governance and administrative provisions are adjusted with updated authority and specific procedural clarifications. Rule 1150-02-.14 (Limited Permit) is updated to require that applicants take the examination within 90 days of receiving the limited permit, with immediate cessation of practice and expiration of the limited permit upon exam failure, and it clarifies limited permit limitations (one permit; non-renewable). Rule 1150-02-.19 (Board Meetings, Officers, Consultants, Records and Declaratory Orders) revises meeting and officer/designee authority details and updates declaratory order adoption language. Rule 1150-02-.20 (Consumer Right-To-Know Requirements) updates malpractice and criminal conviction reporting thresholds/requirements. Rule 1150-02-.21 and .22 are where the document meaningfully adds modern specialized practice access: .21 governs dry needling competency/training and .22 adds the Occupational Therapy Licensure Compact framework (remote-state patient encounter law governs within compact privilege; conflicting member-state laws are superseded to the extent of the conflict).

The rules state no public comments were received. The effective date shown for the filing is June 21, 2026. A fee timing general statement in the filing indicates new fee or fee increases typically take effect July 1 following expiration of a 90-day period after filing unless emergency/permanent emergency conditions apply (and unless the Board did not collect sufficient fees for two preceding fiscal years).

FULL SUMMARY

The proposed regulation establishes additional documentation requirements for applicants seeking “equivalent credit” toward Nevada’s music therapy licensure requirements under NRS 622.087. An applicant must submit (1) a transcript or other documentation showing the courses completed as part of the training program and (2) a copy of the certificate issued upon completion of that training program, as part of the license application.

It also revises procedures in NAC 640D.200 and NAC 640D.210 for handling complaints that a person is practicing music therapy without a license. Upon receiving such a complaint, the Executive Officer must first investigate the complaint rather than immediately sending a certified letter directing a cease-and-desist and requiring a license application within 10 days. A person being investigated must cooperate fully, including participating in requested interviews, allowing onsite inspections of locations where the alleged unlicensed practice is occurring, and providing requested documentation (including evidence that the person is not engaged in unlicensed music therapy if applicable).

If, after the investigation, the Executive Officer determines the person is practicing without a license, the Executive Officer must direct the person to cease and desist and must notify the person that a license application must be submitted to the Executive Officer within 10 days. The matter is then referred to the Office of the Attorney General and the district attorney of the county of the alleged violation for investigation and possible prosecution if the person either (a) fails to submit the required application within that 10-day window or (b) fails to cooperate fully with the investigation. A person who submits the required application may not engage in music therapy services until the Board issues a license, and if the application is denied, the person may not reapply for 2 years.

In addition, the regulation revises how complaints are forwarded for investigation by the Certification Board for Music Therapists (or its successor organization). The Executive Officer must forward each complaint to the Certification Board (or successor) except that, to the extent money is available, the Executive Officer may first examine the complaint to determine whether good cause exists to conduct an investigation; if good cause is found, the Executive Officer either forwards the complaint to request a written report or commences an investigation (depending on available funds). If the Executive Officer conducts an investigation and finds credible evidence supporting the complaint, the Executive Officer may forward the complaint, collected information, and investigation findings to the Certification Board (or successor). The failure of a licensee to cooperate with an investigation remains grounds for disciplinary action.

FULL SUMMARY

The document contains a preproposal statement of inquiry by Washington State Department of Health regarding the possible creation of a new licensing rule chapter for music therapists under Title 246 WAC. It indicates the department is considering establishing licensing regulations and associated fees, potentially also addressing any needs for an advisory committee.

The statement identifies statutory authority (RCW 18.233.060, RCW 18.233.070, RCW 43.70.250, and chapter 18.233 RCW) and explains that SHB 1247 (chapter 175, Laws of 2023), codified as chapter 18.233 RCW, directs the department to adopt rules implementing a music therapist licensure program that must be in place by January 1, 2025. It specifies that the future rules are expected to include (1) education, training, and examination requirements for initial licensure; (2) continuing education requirements; (3) fees for licensing, examination, and renewal; and (4) other qualifications determined by the secretary.

The document describes the rule development process as collaborative and provides contact details for participation before publication of a proposed rule (including an identified individual, mailing address, phone/fax/TTY, and an email address). It also states that the department will use existing GovDelivery lists and known contact information to inform interested parties and provides subscription directions, including guidance to locate the “Music Therapists” topic under the “Health Professions” category.

The document contains an agency regulatory agenda entry stating that the Department of Financial and Professional Regulation will develop rules to implement the Music Therapy Licensing and Practice Act. It explains that PA 102-882 (signed May 13, 2022) authorizes the Department to license and regulate the profession of music therapists, and that the division is currently drafting implementing rules.

No rule text is promulgated and no specific regulatory requirements are imposed in this document. The agenda entry provides a rulemaking schedule status: no meetings or hearings have been scheduled, and the Department anticipates issuing the first notice in March 2023.

It identifies the statutory authority for the anticipated rulemaking as the Music Therapy Licensing and Practice Act (225 ILCS 56). It also notes that newly licensed music therapists would be affected. No related rulemakings or other pertinent information are listed.

The proposed rules under the Music Therapy Licensing and Practice Act aim to establish music therapists as a newly-licensed profession in Illinois. These rules introduce comprehensive procedures for licensure, including requirements for initial applications, license renewals, continuing education, and recordkeeping. The act outlines the necessary qualifications for applicants, such as holding a baccalaureate degree in music therapy or an equivalent program, and mandates the completion of the Music Therapy Board Certification Examination.

The act emphasizes the importance of standardized educational requirements, requiring programs to be regionally accredited and to cover essential music therapy principles and clinical foundations. Additionally, licensed music therapists will be required to complete 40 hours of continuing education every two years, with specific training on Alzheimer's disease and other dementias for those working with adult populations, starting in 2026.

The rules also detail the process for restoring licenses that have been revoked or suspended, including the evaluation of rehabilitation efforts and compliance with previous conditions. Various fees associated with licensing actions, such as applications and renewals, are established to support the regulatory framework.

Overall, the implementation of these rules is expected to enhance the quality of care provided by licensed music therapists in Illinois, while also potentially increasing economic activity within the health care sector. The act aims to create a structured and professional environment for music therapy practice, ensuring that practitioners meet established educational and ethical standards.

The proposed regulation for music therapy practice in Virginia aims to establish licensure requirements for music therapists, following a legislative mandate from the 2020 Acts of Assembly. This regulation will require individuals to obtain a Music Therapist-Board Certification (MT-BC) credential, which involves completing an accredited music therapy program and passing a national examination. The fee structure for licensure includes an initial application fee of $100 and annual renewal fees ranging from $30 to $55, along with various other fees for reinstatement and documentation.

The regulation is expected to encourage educational institutions to expand their music therapy programs, as currently only two universities in Virginia offer accredited training. It may also create a competitive job market for licensed music therapists, potentially increasing their compensation and job opportunities. However, individuals who practiced music therapy without a license prior to 2020 may face challenges in continuing their practice unless they obtain the new license or qualify for specific exceptions.

The proposed regulations emphasize the protection of public health, safety, and welfare by establishing standards of practice for licensed music therapists. Key provisions include maintaining client confidentiality, ensuring informed consent, and avoiding dual relationships that could impair professional judgment. Additionally, licensed music therapists will be required to complete continuing education requirements for license renewal.

The economic impact analysis indicates that the regulation may adversely affect small businesses in the music therapy sector, as compliance with the new standards may lead to increased costs for practitioners. Overall, the changes are set to take effect on November 17, 2024, and are expected to significantly impact the music therapy industry by establishing stricter ethical and professional standards.

The document outlines the establishment of regulations for the practice of music therapy in Virginia, which will require music therapists to obtain licensure. This regulatory framework aims to enhance the standards of practice within the healthcare and therapeutic services industry, specifically for those providing music therapy services.

Applicants for licensure must complete a detailed application process, which includes submitting verification of any existing mental health or health professional licenses and a report from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services National Practitioner Data Bank. All fees associated with the application and renewal process are nonrefundable, which may have financial implications for applicants.

Licensed music therapists are required to renew their licenses annually by June 30, which involves submitting a renewal form and paying the renewal fee. Additionally, they must complete a minimum of 20 hours of continuing education each year, including specific training in ethics and standards of practice, which could increase operational costs for music therapy practices.

The regulations also stipulate that individuals whose licenses have been suspended or revoked must go through a reinstatement process, which includes submitting a new application and paying a reinstatement fee. These changes are set to take effect on December 1, 2025, and are expected to impact the music therapy industry in Virginia by necessitating compliance with new standards.

FULL SUMMARY

The regulation revises Nevada teacher licensure pathways by changing how provisional licenses are issued, supervised training requirements are satisfied, and specific licensure categories are structured. It requires a provisional license issued under NAC 391.057 to be valid for up to three years, nonrenewable, and convertible to an initial license after at least two full school years if the licensee earns evaluation ratings of “highly effective” or “effective” in each year and completes required academic coursework; if the licensee withdraws from or is no longer enrolled in an alternative route program, the qualified provider must notify the Office of Educator Licensure within 15 days and the provisional license becomes immediately invalid upon receipt of that notification, with a reinstatement option available before the expiration date if the applicant is accepted into another alternative route and pays the required fee. It also renames the “Teacher Licensure Office” as the “Office of Educator Licensure” across the amended provisions and similarly requires alternative-route providers to notify the Office of Educator Licensure within 15 days when a program participant withdraws, triggering automatic invalidation of conditional endorsements.

For alternative route licensure, the regulation keeps the pathway to an initial license tied to completing provider-required education and training (including supervised, school-based experience), passing (or qualifying for an exemption from) the basic reading, writing, and mathematics competency test, and paying the required fee. It adds eligibility for members of the Armed Forces of the United States, spouses of such members, veterans, and spouses of veterans to obtain a license on a basis equivalent to completion of Nevada’s alternative route if they completed an alternative route program in another state, and it adjusts early childhood pathway requirements by replacing prior practicum expectations with a one-semester-course practicum requirement tied to an early childhood license coursework provision under NAC 391.056, allowing classroom experience in the first year of teaching early childhood to satisfy the practicum requirement. The regulation further changes the requirements for an early childhood teaching license by replacing earlier licensure options and course-hour thresholds with new course and experience specifications: it requires additional early childhood education coursework totaling specified semester hours, adds defined categories for supervised student teaching from birth through grade 2 (or, instead of student teaching, one year of verifiable early childhood teaching experience in a licensed program), and replaces prior course lists with updated requirements emphasizing specified subjects such as language and literacy, mathematics, science, social studies, classroom management, culturally and linguistically responsive pedagogy, play theory and creativity, and assessment and evaluation; it also adds or clarifies early childhood course content in areas previously listed differently. It revises the elementary license preparation requirements by increasing total credit in elementary professional education to 41 semester hours, revising the distribution of student teaching, methods coursework, and professional education course content, and replacing earlier subject emphases with updated requirements that include social, emotional and academic development, multicultural education and culturally relevant pedagogy, multi-tiered systems of supports, strategies for working with children with disabilities, and child development and learning.

In addition, the regulation removes recreational physical education as a recognized comprehensive major or minor for purposes of obtaining a secondary license. It revises administrator conditional endorsement practice by retaining the requirement for acceptance into an approved alternative route program, confirming experience and licensing prerequisites, and keeping the three-year nonrenewable validity structure, reinstatement conditions, and the 15-day provider notice requirement that triggers automatic invalidation when a participant withdraws or stops enrollment. It also revises music therapist endorsement renewal by continuing to require renewal through the Office of Educator Licensure with submission of a copy of an unexpired state music therapy license and the applicable fee.

Finally, the regulation eliminates special qualifications licensure provisions by repealing NAC 391.015 and NAC 391.0583, which previously established the location of licensure administrative services and a special qualifications license structure requiring specific endorsements, employer training and mentoring duties for certain school placements, and additional post-issuance coursework for license holders. It sets an effective timing rule for this regulation’s substantive changes for at least the early childhood and related provisions by making them effective upon filing by the Secretary of State or on August 1, 2026, whichever is later, and it provides the same later effective date language for the modified early childhood licensure section.

FULL SUMMARY

The regulation establishes and revises the requirements for a Department of Education endorsement to serve as a music therapist in a public school, and changes the endorsement’s expiration/renewal framework.

It specifically amends NAC 391.276 to: (1) require, for issuance of the music-therapist endorsement, both a valid music-therapy license issued by the Health Care Purchasing and Compliance Division of the Nevada Health Authority (under NRS 640D.110) and a bachelor’s degree or higher in music therapy; and (2) remove the prior rule that the endorsement expires on the same date as the holder’s music-therapy license. Instead, the amended provision states that the endorsement “may be renewed” by submitting to the Office of Educator Licensure: a copy of a valid, unexpired music-therapy license and the fee prescribed by NAC 391.070 or 391.073, as applicable.

The amendment also retains an exemption for applicants for a special license with this endorsement from the requirements of NAC 391.036 and 391.065, but conditions the exemption on the applicant not applying at the same time for issuance or renewal of another license or endorsement that would subject the applicant to those requirements.

In practical terms, the document’s changes shift the endorsement from being tied to the license’s expiration date to being renewed through a separate renewal process based on maintaining an unexpired license and paying the applicable fee, while also clarifying the issuing licensing authority referenced in the licensing requirement.

FULL SUMMARY

This proposed regulation revises Nevada Administrative Code (NAC) 391.276 to change (1) the qualifications and documents required to obtain an endorsement to serve as a music therapist, and (2) the endorsement’s expiration/renewal framework.

It amends NAC 391.276(1) by requiring that an applicant hold (a) a valid music therapy license issued by the Health Care Purchasing and Compliance Division of the Nevada Health Authority (pursuant to NRS 640D.110, as amended by 2025 Senate Bill 494) and (b) a bachelor’s degree or higher in music therapy. The amendment removes the prior general “valid” licensing wording as a standalone requirement and instead specifies the licensing authority and adds/retains the degree requirement as an explicit second criterion.

It amends NAC 391.276(2) by removing the endorsement’s automatic expiration tied to the expiration date of the underlying music therapy license. Instead, it provides that an endorsement “may” be renewed by submitting to the Office of Educator Licensing of the Department: (a) a copy of a valid, unexpired license to practice music therapy issued by the Health Care Purchasing and Compliance Division, and (b) the fee prescribed by NAC 391.070 or 391.073, as applicable. The effect described in the document’s digest is that the endorsement no longer shares the same expiration date as the music therapy license.

It retains NAC 391.276(3), which exempts an applicant for issuance or renewal of a special license with a music-therapist endorsement from the requirements of NAC 391.036 and 391.065 if the applicant is not also applying for issuance or renewal of another license or endorsement that triggers those requirements.